Lady Alaria
Posts: 160
Joined: 10/16/2006 Status: offline
|
Hmm, I find myself wondering, would it just be surface thoughts or would it include all context? If just the former, I think it would put a serious strain on any relationship. And might seriously twist a D/s one. Not entirely certain, I've never gone as deeply into D/s or M/s as most of the folk who post here, but it seems to me that a large part of the power exchange is about _not_ knowing. I think a lot of it is only interesting if you don't know. And having all the insecurities of a top constantly available to a sub might do strange things, might make trust difficult, and would certainly make subspace more difficult to achieve. "Ah, I can let go now, S/He is now in complete control" would be a bit difficult if the dom/me was broadcasting a momentary insecurity. We have them, they generally go away, it's not really an issue, but if I had one, and they heard, and responded, and I heard it might increase mine...and.... -snowball rolling downhill special effect inserted here-. Not to mention the fact that we'd have to constantly be second guessing our thoughts. what if they were misunderstood? Imagine a thought that was misunderstood being responded to with a kneejerk mental reaction and the possibility of -that- getting out of hand. Mental screaming match, and very hard to control. Relationships are about learning to communicate lovingly. We'd have to relearn all the rules. Might do, in time, but the curve would probably be pretty steep. As to the latter, well...that's where you step into hive-mind land. If we can understand everyone's thoughts(or even one person's thoughts), there are no misunderstandings at all, anymore, ever again. If you really understood where someone else was coming from all the time it would become impossible to disagree with them about anything, really. You'd start having parallel thoughts, and working in tandem on the same idea. Playing devils advocate and trading places on ideas. Eventually, especially with 2 people only, the link would tighten up to the point where the 2 minds would function effectively as one(possibly quite like the 2 halves of the human brain). Where there where once 2 minds, now there would be one. The ultimate joining. A seperateness of conciousness might still exist, but it would probably not be noticable to the participants. Sometimes I wonder if this, in actuality _is_ the nature of the interaction between the 2 halves of the brain. 2 disctinct entities, seperate conciousnesses, that have agreed to fully share one another's thoughts and so act as such a single unit that each has forgotten that it is not, in fact, alone..... This may be a part of the source for the search for our other half... And yeah, I've thought about this question before. -edit, typos, style, and a bit added-
< Message edited by Lady Alaria -- 10/17/2006 12:19:18 PM >
|