ShreveportMaster
Posts: 899
Joined: 10/6/2004 From: Dallas, Tx Status: offline
|
I'm personally for it. I think that it needs to be applied carefully, usually in situations where there can be no possibility of reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the dirtball in question. And I agree with Popeye, it needs to be done publicly. Bringing back public hangings is a splendid idea, not only will this serve as a vivid warning, but it's also ecologically responsible, One can re-use the rope. And as has been pointed out, Capital Punishment is about punishment, not deterrence, though it can serve that effect as well. And as to it not working, well, I'll agree if you can show Me evidence of even one executed murderer, rapist,etc who ever committed another crime of any type.... What? you can't? Well then, obviously it does in fact work perfectly. I think we'd have a lot fewer violent crimes if it was common knowledge that if you do X, and you get caught, even once, you're gonna dance on air on live TV. Guaranteed, no way out, do not pass go, do not collect 200 appeals. Yes, I realize this is the Old West mentality, but they had proportionately a hell of a lot less crime than we do nowadays, thanks in part to folks like the Hon. Issac Parker (affactionately known as the Hanging judge) My philosophy is give'em a fair trial, then hang'em. I wish you well, Shreve
_____________________________
"And to sooth the Bosk, there was found a Singing Cowboy. To soothe the Cowboy, a kajira is needed." Riders of Gor Book 37, Pg 298 ;-)
|