|
NorthernGent -> RE: 911 - Al-Qaeda or Hoax? (11/3/2006 1:31:32 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy
quote:
ORIGINAL: aviinterra
I usually do not post on message boards, but this thread has me interested. I am not sure who did it, or why, but there seems to be an easier way to get to the source than looking at pixalized video or pictures of the buildings. How about the money source? Someone here mentioned that the U.S. govt trained Osama, and that is true, they indirectly used him and his men to create problems for the Soviets in the Afghan-Soviet conflict. The U.S. pumped money into the ISI ( Pakistani Intelligence office ), which further disbursed it to Osama. This is all well documented. Would it not make sense to check if they simply used Osama again to their own benefit if indeed this awful tragedy was caused by the U.S. govt?The highest intelligence Pakistani official was in the U.S. for a week long visit at the time the attacks occured. I have little doubt that there were people on the planes, that the hijackers were real and as reported in the official story. Looking at all the evidence, it seems that maybe al-Qaeda was simply "helped" financially, as well as politically ( confusion in Norad, Atta's visitations of Republican boat parties, the purposeful deletion of information before 9/11 about men who would become the hijackers within the CIA, perhaps passing along WTC plans, etc.). I doubt Bush was in charge of all of this, he is simply the figure on top for now, whose reins are pulled by the man without a face none of us knows. But...I must say, the buildings did come down in a very odd fashion, especially WTC 7. There is some good video that you all can download here: http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html
I have not watched all of them, but I have seen evidence #P200015, which shows the wreckage just after the collapse from a helicopter, as well as close ups of the towers as they are burning. You can see the damage to the buildings exterior in the close ups, as well as weird flashes going on in one of the towers just before it falls. Warning: some scenes are not pleasant. Also, for your consideration, a theory I have heard: the flight that crashed over Penn. was supposed to hit WTC 7, and that the whole building was preprogrammed to fall as it did. But that flight encountered problems with the passangers and fell down too early. I don't know what to make of that, just heard it on the net.
Hello A/all,
I made the point on this thread, or possibly another one, that while I have real difficulty with phantom planes, nobody being killed in the buildings, doctored video on news shows, and a horde of black jacketted Secret Service men planting thousands of kilos thermate explosives (without being seen, of course) on structural columns throughout the World Trade Center to bring it down, I would not be overly surprised to find that Monkeyboy called Osama Bin Laden, told him to fly planes into the buildings, and fedexed OBL a package of box cutters.
Sinergy
For my money, the most realistic scenario is that the Government learned of the plot (not orchestrated by the US Government) and were left with two choices:
1) Nip it in the bud.
2) Allow it to happen and thus give them the opportunity to go into Iraq and secure all sorts of contracts for multi-nationals. They probably justified it by saying "sooner or later one plot will get through so we're only bringing forward the inevtiable". Thus, the fighter jets did not do their job.
Personally, I would be surprised if it was orchestrated by the US Government but I would not be surprised if they let it happen. Let's face it, the army that went into Iraq in 2003 did not take any experts in civil administration or reconstruction which tells the story that the Government was/is there for gain (at the expense of US soldiers, and if US soldiers are expendable in Iraq then what makes people think that 3,000 US civilians are not expendable in the eyes of the Government?).
|
|
|
|
