TexasMaam
Posts: 1467
Joined: 6/22/2005 Status: offline
|
Oh My My My what a tempest in a Teapot! General Response: *'you* in this paragraph infers 'you, the reader'.....As for 'submit2one', I never posted anything disingenuine or offensive under that nic. My only 'motive' in lurking about as a sub is to engage One Specific Male in communication; it is a test, and I could care less what anyone's opinion of My tests with my One Specific Male are. If I occasionally read a post that interests Me, I post a very sincere and honest response regardless of the nic I am under. I did so, as submit2one, and Najaks response to my sincere and straightforward post generated the rest. I have a news flash for you: I'll continue to change my ID from time to time, even pose as a sub because I can do it so very well, testing my One Specific Male, not 'you'. That doesn't mean I'll be corresponding with anyone else, nor will I engage any Doms or others who don't know Me in any deceptive communication at all, but I will post a sincere response to an occasional thread that interests me no matter what my nic might be at the time. If you'll notice I have no profile posted as submit2one, so as not to encourage anyone to waste any time trying to engage me here. Do I want 'you' to 'approve and accept' Me as someone who uses more than one nic? Do I want 'your' 'respect' for that? *rolls eyes* Oh Puleeze! You guessed it, I really couldn't care less. It's not my intention to deceive anyone other than my One Specific Male and that's our business, not yours, whoever you might be. I'll post what I want, when I want, and the post it will be neither deceptive, nefarious, false nor mean spirited; it will always be straight from the hip. It might even be of interest to someone other than 'you', dear reader, with all due respect. As for you kc692 - I think you're just The Greatest. *huggs* We need to meet and enjoy a glass of wine together sometime and I mean that. LAM: Sorry Old Boy, I have not been "disrespectful to many" at CM 'over the years' on these boards, since I just joined CM as TexasMaam earlier this year. I have been on the web for quite a few years, but not under the nic TexasMaam, so it's possible you have Me confused with someone else. While I have gotten fed up with a few negative, belligerent, chronic blog provacateurs here at CM and have occasionally let them know it, (I wonder who one of those might be, hmmm?), most of the time My posts have been in good fun and tongue in cheek which is easily misinterpreted here on the boards. You have been one to misinterpret My intentions more than most and have continually slammed Me but then you're generally negative, abusive, sarcastic and sadistic (gee how about that?) without much grace or aplomb so your personality assessments only make me laugh these days. Oh, and LAM, the only reason I 'outed' the submit2one ID is because my One Specific Male had already gotten suspicious of My bogus identity making it useless anyway. It's an ongoing dialoge between my One Specific Male and myself and really had absolutely nothing to do with you, as difficult as that may be for your Narcissistic Brain to conceive. My One Specific Male doesn't mind My antics, so neither should you because it doesn't affect you. As for being 'unpopular' here at CM, if my email inbox is any indication, it sure doesn't seem as though your opinion is held by all. candystripper: see above re LAM and while your flying to his 'defense' is commendable it's quite unnecessary. I enjoy your posts overall ; I'm only sorry you mistook My jibe at LAM for some kind of 'stunt I was trying to pull' when I was merely snapping back... I'm sick to death of his slamming Me just because he feels so compelled to do so whenever I post. It's interesting that he is compelled to slam Me no matter what nic I'm under. But then, he seems to slam just about everyone. I suppose it's time for me to block the SOB (Sadistic Old Boy) and have done with. Truce. Wishing all a good day, I'm certainly going to enjoy Mine! Texas Maam
_____________________________
~ My opinions are not necessarily those of the management... ~
|