Morrigel
Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006 Status: offline
|
Just an aside--I prefer to use the word "predator" rather than "abuser" in situations like this and many others. To me, defining someone as a "predator" is less about the type of damage they do--i.e., he/she is only a predator if they rape and kill--but more about the level of real emotional involvement they have with the victim, and the amount of personal suffering is involved. To me, an "abuser" is someone who, although they can be incredibly harmful and insidious, has a great emotional investment with his/her victim. Often, "abusers", when they DO lose their control/domination over the victim, will react with passionate fury, grief, and insane manipulation. They can become psychotic stalkers, among other things, refusing to let go of the power they had over the victim. They drag their heels over divorces, they try to undermine future relationships, they burn the house down on the way out the door--anything to continue to exercise power somehow, to keep doing some kind of ongoing harm in the victim's life, to keep causing pain and damage. Sometimes they will even do things detrimental to themselves in order to do this. To them, the victim is special--and harming the victim fulfills an emotional need. A predator, by contrast, has no emotional investment in anyone but himself/herself. They coldly calculate, lie and deceive, hit and run, and then vanish very easily. They may enjoy their power and they may get a thrill from doing others harm--sometimes great harm--but it is rarely personal and they rarely view their victims as special, or even as individuals really. The victim is just another mark, regardless of what sort of harm they are targeted for--rape, death, a con job, etc.. There isn't a wolf in the world who has a personal vendetta against one particular deer. He just picks the one that moves the slowest. --M
|