Morrigel
Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: meatcleaver However, their ideal partners, men in their age group who earned enough to satisfy them, looked for women a generation younger than who were less demanding and....well, younger! Tastier, more nubile, better looking etc. And as soon as women learn to do the same, we will not have to hear any more bullshit about it, I'm sure. There are plenty of younger, more submissive men in the world who would love to live in the home of a successful older woman, do the household chores, and dedicate their lives to pleasing her. As soon as the stigma of female dominance and male submission is banished from this ridiculously bigoted and sexually repressive society, all these women will figure out that what they are really looking for is the same thing that their male counterparts are looking for--a submissive. They need an attractive partner who has a positive, pleasant attitude and is sexually appealing, who is attentive and loving, who understands the importance and value of the work the dominant partner does and takes whatever actions are necessary to support it and make life easier/better for all concerned. What they DON'T need is an intractable jackass who brings nothing to the table but his inferior income, his inability to understand what the phrase "division of labor" means, and his patriarchal society's sense of entitlement. "Why should I have to take care of the kids? Why should I have to do the dishes? Why should I clean the house?" Well, because you work at home, hon. Women have worked at home for thousands of years--and it has always been WORK. Usually much harder work than anyone does at an office. Regardless, I'm sure all these executive women will be a lot happier as soon as they stop looking for "equals" and start looking to get their needs met. There are plenty of male submissives--younger, the same age, older--who would have no problem with an arrangement like this, and who would hold up their end of it very well indeed. --M
|