RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request

RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

akisha -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 2:59:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SusanofO akisha is right: They killed two other girls (I'd forgotten about that part). - Susan That's what they were originally charge with was the other two girls murders. The actual murder of the little sister came out during the discouvery process. Every one originally thought the sister had died in an unfortunate accident from vomitting while very intoxicated and asphyxiated by accident. Sad thing was she was their first victum. They started out with girls that would willingly play " sex slave" for them, but then that just was not enough "fun" for them and figured they needed to edge it up a bit and take girls by force. My opinion, but I fully believe Hamolka was a 100% willing participant and definately helped plan and carry out their sick little games. She should have got life the same as Bernardo. I honestly think she'll offend again in some form.

SusanofO -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 3:02:45 PM)
My memory was foggy about many of the details. But I did remember thinking that there are some things that are just "beyond the pale" and no way could I ever even fathom doing something like this - "under someone's spell" or not. Of course I think justheather is right. I think that M/s turned into their convenient excuse for making it seem less evil than it was. Didn't work for them very well, though. - Susan

WillHeel -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 3:22:58 PM)
LOL Lucky you're ruffling feathers. Some people enjoy taking a high and mighty road. You're right of course ... "different strokes for different folks"

lighthearted -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:23:47 PM)
ummm, has anyone else noticed we haven't heard from the OP despite 5 pages of replies?

AquaticSub -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:28:06 PM)
Yeah. That happens sometimes. I'd really like to know what she is going to do.

lighthearted -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:30:45 PM)
me too...as well as a few other people here, I would hazard to guess.

slavegirljoy -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:34:29 PM)
News Flash!!!! There a perverts everywhere and there are people who are looking for someone who they see as vulnerable so that they can get what they want from them and not care less about the other person or people they are using. i'm not saying this man is necessarily a pervert but, it doesn't sound like he has yours or your sister's best interests at heart. Would you really ever want to spend your time with someone who wants you to trade your sister (even in a picture) to him for the "privilege" of spending more time with him? Sounds to me like he is just trying to see if you are willing to make that trade and, if you are, you can probably bet that he will be wanting to make more trades with you that will demand far more than just a picture. i wouldn't have anything to do with someone like that. BE VERY CAREFUL! slave joy Owned property of Master David quote: ORIGINAL: LittleDaisyGirl My Sir, that is, the dom I have been training with and hoping for a consideration collar from, has made it pretty clear that he thinks of my younger sister and I together and thinks it's hot. Recently he offered to spend more time with me if I would give him a picture of my sister, which I had previously said no to because it seems unfair to my sister to fuel someone's fantasy with her picture. Of course, I said no. I can't believe he offered that trade. I don't know what to do.

michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:36:07 PM)
although i can never get used to the term "wanker" (i prefer something alittle harsher, like "jerk-off") i would say that you it would be better to move on and find someone that is not into such things.

crouchingtigress -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:43:48 PM)
[image]http://www.collarchat.com/micons/m23.gif[/image]

michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:51:16 PM)
who, me?

crouchingtigress -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:53:52 PM)
no micheal, it was to the Ops horndog master

michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:54:39 PM)
ah, ok...was confused there for a moment.

krikket -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 4:54:50 PM)
I once had request to "involve" my son in "our" activities...leaving immediately worked for me too. What i found unbelievable, however, was that about a month later he called asking me if i had reconsidered since i was still obviously unattached. i just laughed and hung up the phone...lol quote: ORIGINAL: MasterNdorei i have had requests that ranged from my sister, to my (adult) daughter. i could not get away from them fast enough... leaving worked for me... Master's dorei

diamonddreamlove -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 5:50:26 PM)
Start looking cause it does not sound like he cares what you think or want, and he certainly is not respecting consentuality. Would not want this Dom to be taking control of my body, mind, and heart.

orfunboi -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 5:52:32 PM)
I would dump him...plain and simple...buh bye

mnottertail -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 6:06:16 PM)
For all the forementioned reasons is why I don't usually swill my personal brand of mind vomit amongst the psychobabbelists, but................ I will say this (my personal opinions on the right or wrong notwithstanding)..........at least the proposition is out front and personal, this is a whole different brand of poopy diaper than coming home and seeing a nail go into a two by four. Wood cleaving and the hammering sounds and all...................perhaps it is in the realm of fansasy and nobody here is sharing the horrific and nasty shit in your brains when you are alone and spanking your brand of monkey........... Perhaps it is in the realm of fantasy, perhaps in the realm of the ninth ring of hell and it gets a couple points for that, as out front-- 'cause I would be browned off if my neighbor acted on his fantasy of shingling my house without a little discussion at the outset. At least you know what stands where.................. Anybody get that? Ron

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 6:09:35 PM)
1) Age play is not at all the same as incest and should not be confused with eachother. While can certainly be into both, it tends to be rare. 2) IMO incest fantasies are a lot more common than people think or want to accept- but I don't think they are "very common" when it comes to the great wide world of kinky fantasies to have. 3) Yes, I think the boundaries that exist for sex with a non-biological partner are exactly the same as with a biological partner. 4) The sending of the picture itself is not a problem- I showed my partners pictures of my 5 and 7 yo nephews long before they met in person because my nephews are the most gorgeous creatures on this green and blue earth and deserve to be seen by as many people as possible as I can show them to. I don't think anyone would tell me I'm a bad or immoral person for showing kinky people pictures of my relatives without their permission. The real issue is his trolling and attempt at seduction when the circumstances are obviously not lending themselves towards such.

AquaticSub -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 6:14:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross 4) The sending of the picture itself is not a problem- I showed my partners pictures of my 5 and 7 yo nephews long before they met in person because my nephews are the most gorgeous creatures on this green and blue earth and deserve to be seen by as many people as possible as I can show them to. I don't think anyone would tell me I'm a bad or immoral person for showing kinky people pictures of my relatives without their permission. The real issue is his trolling and attempt at seduction when the circumstances are obviously not lending themselves towards such. There is a great deal of difference in the intent though. To show a person a picture of a relative because you love them and think they are beautiful is very different then a dominant trading attention for a picture so that he can wank to it. I don't care if my dominant hands out my pictures to anyone he likes. But if he starts handing them out knowing they will be used for sex purpose, including self-graticification, he better let me know because that's something I need to consent to. Not everyone in this world needs to see me naked. I've dealt with odd men (to put it lightly) and you don't add to fuel to anyone's sexual desire for someone with their consent.

psykocloud32 -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 6:48:15 PM)
I have had the same requests from a Dom I was seeing a year ago. He was into picture taking and saw a pic of my grown daughter once and ask me to ask her if she would just pose for some pics. I said No to him. My daughter knows a little of my lifestyle but I will not involve her at all. psyko

LTRsubNW -> RE: Sir's Unbelievable Request (12/19/2006 6:51:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: psykocloud32 I have had the same requests from a Dom I was seeing a year ago. He was into picture taking and saw a pic of my grown daughter once and ask me to ask her if she would just pose for some pics. I said No to him. My daughter knows a little of my lifestyle but I will not involve her at all. psyko Yeeeeeeg !!!!!

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125