NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl quote:
ORIGINAL: MistressStchWich "It's more like: women who treat men like crap tend to do it AFTER they've found a man who's fallen for them. Beforehand, they're little angels..." Lordandmaster I find that your comment has been absolutley true of every male I have ever known as a friend, sibling, or partner. Always Mr. Wonderful, the perfect guy- very attentive and solicitous of her time and attention at first, for say about 6 months to a year; then they began to treat her like crap- the male romance version of bait and switch; but Women usually do it from the get go and are not ordinarilly very subtle or sneaky about it. I would definitely agree that women are usually more upfront. I have to disagree with the idea of people getting what they deserve in terms of relationships (someone said that). If that were the case, losers and con artists would end up with each other instead of with the good honest people they use and deceive. What really confuses me is the fact that men like to save damsels in distress, yet they say they are turned off by needy women. How is a woman who is homeless or in constant need of rescuing less "needy" than a woman who has her shit together and just wants to chat for a few minutes 2-3 times a week and maybe see the guy once a week? Can any men explain that one? I disagree about women being more upfront. Women when courting are much more likely to pay attention to their appearance. They are much more likely to be agreeable. And are generally much more attentive. How this is different from a man I can't tell. A guy/girl that goes for a needy person more than likely I'd gander has low self-esteem issues, and feels that they have a much better chance of keeping someone that needs them as opposed to a person that is free to leave without consequence. I don't see this as a male issue, as plenty of women get into relationships with men they support, or are otherwise excessively needy. More importantly the person going for the needy individual probably fulfills there desires to help/control others and therefore be in a higher position in the relationship. If you save someone, you are automatically on a higher level than the person saved. If I help a homeless person, I would be the alpha. If I teach someone, I would be the alpha. If I house and clothe a person, I would be the alpha If we are each self-sufficient in all the basic areas, one must gain alpha status in other ways, such as wisdom, intellect, ethics, etc.... It is simpler to gain the high ground when one goes for needy. And one can feel good about themselves in their "giving". It could work well, as long as each person is okay being in that position. So, it's not necessarily bad or good. It's matching the right people together. I don't think however either sex has any type of claim to being attracted to neediness. Basicly I believe the concept breaks down to I gave, You owe. So to the person involved in such a relationship, they've secured their position as the alpha(giver/saver/saint) member of the relationship in the area they are giving. If that makes sense. Some "giving" isn't "giving" at all but rather a way to control or justify oneself "goodness" or "worth". And the needy are the best targets for such things. Don't know if that made sense or not. But I do think it's more to do with the person being "victimized/helping/giving" than the "user/needy/taker". It's pretty easy not to let oneself be used. You just don't let yourself be used. At least more than once...
|