RE: Jihad Jane??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:46:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

     No, Sinergy, it is the standard opening line in a templated argument.  You seem to acknowledge this by using the phrase "at this moment."  We've heard it before, "only a mother...blah, blah, blah."  It's a bullshit attempt to grab the moral high ground by an appeal to emotion.  It sets a standard for debate on one topic, which she is unwilling to apply to herself on other topics.



You know that when these words were said by her that it was some sort of templated response?

Or is this simply your armchair quarterback's opinion?

Sinergy



    Hehehehehe...  armchair quarterback???   Julia and I have been clashing over ideas, and the best solutions to the problems that confront our culture, country and world for some time now.  Surely, you have learned to read the 'tells' of your sparring partners, haven't you?




Sinergy -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:50:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

    No, Sinergy, it is the standard opening line in a templated argument.  You seem to acknowledge this by using the phrase "at this moment."  We've heard it before, "only a mother...blah, blah, blah."  It's a bullshit attempt to grab the moral high ground by an appeal to emotion.  It sets a standard for debate on one topic, which she is unwilling to apply to herself on other topics.



You know that when these words were said by her that it was some sort of templated response?

Or is this simply your armchair quarterback's opinion?

Sinergy



   Hehehehehe...  armchair quarterback???   Julia and I have been clashing over ideas, and the best solutions to the problems that confront our culture, country and world for some time now.  Surely, you have learned to read the 'tells' of your sparring partners, haven't you?


Lovely non-response to my question.

I can assume that your comment about "templated response" is a personal opinion unsubstantiated by any actual factual information.

Sinergy




WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 9:32:39 AM)

      This is an excellent question.  We might even be able to steer this thing back towards the topic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
Please explain how your Pavlovian "Support our President" stance supports our troops?



    I can understand how you would reach such a conclusion about my stance.  It is inaccurate.  I respect the office.  You won't find me posting about "President Thunderthighs, Bitch-ary" or "that c*** in the White House," two years from now.  It's a reflection of my personal values.  Freedom of Expression covers my right NOT to frame it that way just as certainly as yours to refer to the CIC as "Monkeyboy."  If you believe your way is the superior political tactic for victory in '08. I shall respectfully, disagree.

    The point of the OP was about the impact of HOW this issue has been debated.  The tone of bile is turn-off.  I think it probably contributed to President Bush's re-election.  Living in CA, my vote for him in '04 was as much a symbolic protest vote against that tone as when I voted for Nader rather than a candidate who had lost my vote before I even gained it. 

  Bringing Fonda in was a mistake.  Her behavior in Vietnam will never be forgotten or forgiven by many.  I know one person already who won't be participating in any more protests out of respect for his father's (a life-long Democrat) feelings about her.  And he has a pick-up truck and a lot of expertise with sound systems.

   I will be quite happy when Bush has left Washington.  I doubt I will get the opportunity to vote for the candidate I think would be best for the job and to get us the hell out of this mess.  I'll probably end up picking the one I dislike least, and how that individuals supporters conduct themselves will play a role in the decision.




WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 9:42:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
I can assume that your comment about "templated response" is a personal opinion unsubstantiated by any actual factual information.



      Is that how you would describe your understanding of where a punch is coming from when "so and so" drops his left shoulder a half inch?




farglebargle -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 10:07:09 AM)

quote:

I will be quite happy when Bush has left Washington.


I'll be happy when he's in a prison cell next to Jeff Skilling.

Let me rephrase that.

There won't be JUSTICE for all the dead until Bush is in a prison cell next to Jeff Skilling.






Sternhand4 -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 12:09:48 PM)


Sternhand4:
Perhaps you could tell us just how the war in Iraq is preserving freedom for us.  From what I have read there is less freedom in Iraq now that we are there and have installed our puppet government than they had under sodamned insane.  More Iraquies have been killed since we have been there than under sodamned insane in his entire tenure. 
One can join the service when they are 17.  You cannot vote, drink alcohol or enter into a contract when you are 17.  Hardly an adult decission. 
What is that I do not get?
thompson
[/quote]

I cant say that the current war in Iraq is preserving our freedom per se. Thats more of a constitution issue.
Here's my take..
It is demostrating that we have the will to go along with the ability to fight.
This and only this will prevent country's like Iran, China, N Korea from entering conflict with us. You want a political solution, then you have to be able to project force in a region, or else.
After Viet Nam, this country appeared weak.. look at the Iranian taking of our embassy. The military was drawn down and under equiped, so we had little ability to defend our nation interests. After Somalia Osama has been quoted as saying we wouldnt take the losses to insure victory, thats what gives them hope. Make us bleed and we'll run they belive. This kind of thinking is what led them to attack us.
Our own media " I'm not going to diverge into how left they are" helps them. They dont show how we help build schools, roads and wells. Its only negative aspects being shown.
We learned many lessons from these defeats. We fight at night now  like no other nation. We can bomb targets from thousands of miles away now, with amazing accuracy. But you still unfortunately have to put boots on the ground to control populations.  More unfortunate is that it only takes a few radicals/ terrorists to inflict harm on the rest of us.
It took us many years after WWII to insure democracy's in Japan, Germany and others. They also were not tribal people like in the middle east. Where democracy is a new idea. Education is the longterm answer, with more moderation. We should also not be opposd to splitting Iraq into 3 parts so the sunni's, shites. and kurds can separate.
It is in the strategic national interests of this country to have at least 1 stable arab democracy in the middle east. It will not be easy, or the cost in live cheap.
But in the long run it will save lives.
I highlighted a section of your quote above because of the ridiculous nature in its posting, lets ask the Kurds if the found this to be true, Saddan gassed whole villages into extinction for opposing him. We also let them down after Gulf I  when we led them to believe that they would be supported in overthrowing Saddam. We cant just walk away again. every time we do it costs us credibilty and livesndown the road.

On a personal note I enlisted at 17 myself,, mom wasnt happy but she signed the contract. I agree that at 17 you should be able to vote if your on active or reserve duty. And The drinking part was never a problem, actually a lot of the fun went out of it after it wasn't a challenge to get into the bars. But again on active or reserve duty, you show an ID and you should get served.
Not all the decisions I made at 17 we're adult but entering the service was one of the best ones.
Stay warm
S






WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 12:35:36 PM)

      I agree with your assessment of lives being saved in the long run, Stern.  Unfortunately, I doubt that wisdom will prevail.  The lesson of Vietnam about allowing politics to dictate the conduct of military operations was not learned.  If this current change of military command and strategy does not produce results, I shall withdraw my support for continuing. 

    I don't think the protest bundle is really prepared to accept the inevitable consequences of an untimely withdrawal.  I shall reserve the right to throw the starvation of millions in their faces as this country does what it must to meet our energy needs.  Prices of corn are already rising, according to reports I have heard.  The next act in this war will be far bloodier than anything we have seen, and I'll be throwing that blood in their faces as well.




Sinergy -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 1:02:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

I think it probably contributed to President Bush's re-election.  Living in CA, my vote for him in '04 was as much a symbolic protest vote against that tone as when I voted for Nader rather than a candidate who had lost my vote before I even gained it. 



We will have to agree to disagree.  My money on why Monkeyboy was elected and re-elected will be bet on the color that represents election fraud, purged voter registration rolls, voting machine tampering, and various other illegalities which the previous Congress refused to do their jobs by investigating.

You can start learning about it with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s articles in Rolling Stone.  Googling Stackwell, Diebold, etc.

Xinergy




WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 1:18:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

I think it probably contributed to President Bush's re-election.  Living in CA, my vote for him in '04 was as much a symbolic protest vote against that tone as when I voted for Nader rather than a candidate who had lost my vote before I even gained it. 



We will have to agree to disagree.  My money on why Monkeyboy was elected and re-elected will be bet on the color that represents election fraud, purged voter registration rolls, voting machine tampering, and various other illegalities which the previous Congress refused to do their jobs by investigating.




      Well, duh.  You also have factors like, "voting the graveyard," disallowing absentee ballots and people like me making suggestions on the internet that Conservatives vote on Tuesday, Liberals on Wednesday.  Ain't American politics grand?\

    Perhaps you'd care to offer us a scholarly dissertation on just how JFK gained the office?  Unfortunately, the food I've been grilling for the Superbowl party is ready and I need to get ready to root for "Da Bears."  Likely as futile as telling hate-filled leftists they are making things worse, but we all do what we can, with what we have.




Sinergy -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 6:26:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

     I agree with your assessment of lives being saved in the long run, Stern.  Unfortunately, I doubt that wisdom will prevail.  The lesson of Vietnam about allowing politics to dictate the conduct of military operations was not learned.  If this current change of military command and strategy does not produce results, I shall withdraw my support for continuing. 



Apparently, the Iraqi dissidents have a new anti-aircraft missile.  We have lost 4 choppers in the past 7 days.

Another lesson we never learned from Vietnam is how to avoid throwing good money after bad.

Sinergy




WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:19:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
Apparently, the Iraqi dissidents have a new anti-aircraft missile.  We have lost 4 choppers in the past 7 days.


       I seem to recall losing four passenger jets in a morning, a few years ago, along with a couple of tall buildings.  But after we run from Iraq, the Islamic Crazy People will have learned never to try anything like that again, right?




farglebargle -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:23:27 PM)

quote:

The lesson of Vietnam about allowing politics to dictate the conduct of military operations was not learned.


The lesson of Vietnam was "Don't Support Unlawful Governments". After all, SOUTH VIETNAM was a rogue nation, refusing to obey UN MANDATES.

Or maybe, "Don't listen to pissant retards who want to become a regional power, like Diem. Or Achmed Chalabi."




farglebargle -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:30:24 PM)

quote:


I seem to recall losing four passenger jets in a morning, a few years ago, along with a couple of tall buildings. But after we run from Iraq, the Islamic Crazy People will have learned never to try anything like that again, right?


Wrong. That's retarded.

Airplanes will not be used as attack vectors because THE PEOPLE have learned that the US GOVERNMENT is a bunch of idiots for suggesting "COOPERATE WITH HIJACKERS" as a strategy in the first place, and won't ever be so fucking dumb as to actually OBEY the damned feds going forward.

I don't know why you want to tie 9/11 to Iraq, but that's just propaganda, and doesn't bring anything to the conversation. Hussein and Iraq were NEVER any threat to the United States. Osama bin Ladin and Al Quaida however, were. Hmmm.. How many Al Quaida leaders have been brought to trial?





farglebargle -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:34:42 PM)

Let's sum up all this:

Either:

A) You Want OUR TROOPS TO DIE IN IRAQ.

or

B) You Want OUR TROOPS HOME NOW.

Pick one.

If you don't bring them home, more will die. Period. Everything else is just the cowardly avoidance of YOUR responsibility for those deaths.









WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:36:06 PM)

       There were a great many 'lessons of Vietnam,' Fargle.  We lost our first war there.  The problem is, people on one side only want to talk about the lessons that can be blamed on the other and vice-versa.




farglebargle -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:39:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

There were a great many 'lessons of Vietnam,' Fargle. We lost our first war there. The problem is, people on one side only want to talk about the lessons that can be blamed on the other and vice-versa.

quote:

The lesson of Vietnam about allowing politics to dictate the conduct of military operations was not learned. If this current change of military command and strategy does not produce r


Didn't YOU say "THE LESSON OF VIETNAM"?

Why are there now "Many lessons of vietnam?", once I pointed out that you were incorrect. There was ONE LESSON. Don't mobilize the army of a Constitutional Republic unless the very existence of that Republic is in jeopardy. Getting involved supporting the unlawful government of Diem was stupid, and stupid beginnings result in failure.

JUST LIKE IRAQ.

And I'm blaming the people who made the dumb fucking decisions. In the case of Iraq, the Bush Administration owns it 100%. Hey, they didn't have to go through all the fraud to get us there, but they chose to. And here we are. Did I pick on anyone specific w.r.t. Vietnam? No. I just said we shouldn't have been there supporting an unlawful government. Who was responsible? A lot of people? Can we hold them accountable for Vietnam? No.

Can we hold the Bush Administration responsible for their fraud? I'd like to think so, but don't expect it.





Thadius -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:49:13 PM)

Evening Fargle,

Another lesson learned from the 'Nam' era (and times before that) is never help the French with anything because they will try to fuck you in the ass.  Just referring to how we got drawn in to Viet Nam and Cambodia in the first place.

The more appropriate comparison to Iraq would be our involvement with Afghanistan during the Soviet occupation, and what happened after they were pushed out and we completely withdrew... the vacuum that was left is still being felt.

So if Bin Laden and his friends (all of the radical groups) are the real threat to the US, do you recommend us leveling Syria, Iran, and Saudi Arabia? As they are the biggest contributors to those groups (financially, landwise, and weapons).  Or should we just become isolationists and close our borders completely to insure that no new jihadists enter the country?

Jihad, Hanoi Jane should have been tried for treason and comforting the enemy for her actions during 'Nam.  She is just showing now that her colors haven't changed.

I wish you well,
Thadius




WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 8:58:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Let's sum up all this:

Either:

A) You Want OUR TROOPS TO DIE IN IRAQ.

or

B) You Want OUR TROOPS HOME NOW.

Pick one.

If you don't bring them home, more will die. Period. Everything else is just the cowardly avoidance of YOUR responsibility for those deaths.


      I reject your options.  I want UAV's with 20mm cannon destroying everything that crosses the Iranian border except through checkpoints.  I want snipers killed BEFORE they get a shot off.  If our guys are bleeding and dying, I want them to win.  Do you actually look foward to us losing another war? 

    When I am forced to violence, it isn't over until I've bitten a kneecap, and I don't go to the emergency room alone.  Bloody nose is enough for some I guess.




juliaoceania -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 9:05:19 PM)

FR

It never ceases to amaze me how we talk about what barbarians other people are when we have our military on their soil... it just boggles




WyrdRich -> RE: Jihad Jane??? (2/4/2007 9:07:14 PM)

      Actually, Fargle, I said the "the lesson of Vietnam ABOUT..."  Easy to read either way I guess.  Also, I never thought Iraq had one damn thing to do with 9/11, but the Islamic Crazy People who did can't wait for the propaganda windfall if we fail.

    I've now mentioned 9/11 though, the death sentence (Saddam's Brother style) of a thread in these forums.  I have to get up early, ya'll have fun.




Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02