KenDckey
Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn Mexican slave? Spare me the drama-ramma, and we can have a civilized debate. I live here. Unemployment in the RGV is virtually none. California has a different scenario. That's the beauty of the program, it allowed states to apply the law as they see fit, based on how many TWP's they allow. caitlyn: If we were to take the cost of a field slave at pre civil war prices and adjust it for inflation, amortize it over the productive lifespan of the slave and add to that the cost of upkeep of the slave it would be more than what is being paid to the illegal alien field workers, thus my use of the word slave is not drama it is just economics. thompson OK so you finally got around to answering my question. But remember, slaves in the pre civil war period were beaten, which affected their productivity, legal, had to work manually where now there are quite a few machines to enhance prodution, and were restricted in what they can do. But under the proposals of Bush, they would not be illegal, be guaranteed certain rights not granted to law breakers, and provided protections against the abuse. How do you reconcile this in your economic slavery scenario?
|