valeca
Posts: 403
Joined: 1/9/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Carmeldelight62 Easer said than done. I have a friend who was a sub and she reported to the police how she was being stalked by her ex Dom. When it came time to go to court, his lawyer let it know what their relationship was in detailed, the judge looked at her (the sub) and she had to go for consulting. The judge’s response to the matter was how you could want someone to micro manage your time, piss on you, beat on you, and ask permission to go out with your friends (etc). The courts took away her children. All because what gave her pleasure. Since the initial question has been answered in spades, I'm gonna highjack this for a moment. I think there'd have to be more to this than what's been stated. I can't imagine a judge accepting one person's claim without further questioning about the circumstances, or some substantiated evidence of some sort -- to the extent of having unmentionables removed from the home. More likely, there were serious issues that came to light from the 'consulting', rather than just from one person's claim of kink in the relationship. Without her agreeing in open court that, "Yes, he pissed on me, beat me, etc., and I reveled in it!", or some evidence that lent support to his claims, it's nothing more than his words. And if the consulting was ordered just because she engaged in, and happily received, the activities, I'd bet dollars to donuts, he'd be getting a similar order for having the desire to dole them out. Definitely more to this story than meets the eye.
_____________________________
~valeca, Owned and Operated by Loraith.
|