chrissyslave
Posts: 95
Joined: 1/13/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hisannabelle i know that's a crappy title, but i couldn't think of anything else. something chrissyslave posted on the married men thread in general got me thinking about an attitude i occasionally see in posts by or profiles of other submissives and slaves that i personally don't get. it's the, "i want him to prove his dominance," attitude, for lack of a better term. it's the...i need to be put in my place physically, or, as she (i hope she doesn't mind me taking her words) put it, for a dominant to show they are mentally and physically superior. kind of an "i want to be tamed" attitude, from what i understand (and i'm fully accepting i may be wrong...anyone who comes from this viewpoint, please correct me if i am). i think bratty subs fall under this category in some cases as well, although i am by no means equating everyone who feels this way with being a bratty sub ;) Well, I think it was a bit rude to name myself or paraphrase my comments here, especially without prior okay to do so, much less even alert me you were trying to quote myself. You could have done so without my mention by name or content. And comes across as some continued vindictiveness of a thread that rattled on and on until the moderator brought the BS to a halt. That bloated Elvis had already left the CM building. That said, my reference was for my preference for mostly a mental dominance by a trainer/Master, in large part as his strong corrective attitude and a sense he has a superior view of life/options which I can rely upon (and thus one key reason for a TPE). I love it when he listens to me and quickly says what and where the true relationship boundaries are...a no-nonsense kind of monitoring even in a IM. I would tend to top from the bottom, he know that, and correct those tendencies right away as he hears or sees them. He doesn't do so to prove himself, but is merely exercising his skill and right to exert his authority I have tried to transfer such power to himself. If in fact if I did not sense his being at least equal to my own thinking and control then He would not be One whom I would choose, in any capacity, much less consider a "Superior One" to which my "other" topic thread mentioned (not as myself). Think of it this way, in two ways. I NEVER let a man beat me in pool playing even if that meant I would not be offered a drink or sign of interest before (beat 23 of them in a row one hot night for three hours...and left undefeated) but win or lose if we played well I would have been interested to some degree if an offer came...but not one had the b*** to do so. But if he wants to claim to be my "pool playing master" then he must show me he warrants that title, and I have meet such sports masters before and been beaten/trained by them....yummy! Why else would I wish for him to guide my playing if he was not at least my equal? (only a rhetorical question here....for myself!). What I see myself more in the role is of Xena-Princess Warrior who only will submit to someone at least as able as herself, and in this M/s area that is not an especially high bar to surpass being a newbie (in other lifestyle areas, not M/s, I am a Mistress of sorts...so I go head-to-head at times with newbies in ways that can affect lives). Another comparison is the lioness that is strong yet allow the lion to grab her by the scuff of her neck and have his way with her as her voluntary form of submission. Some masters like the ones who submit by deliberate choice (me), rather than merely being passive, and that is the kind of conscious TPE that I seek. He doesn't do so to prove himself but just being himself, and having the intellect to know the difference. It also means that he might need to reel this one in more slowly in order to land her in his boat of dominance. Different boats for different folks! Chrissy...hear me roar!....and sometimes meow.
_____________________________
Healthy living, diet and exercise...and you say that's a bad thing?!!
|