thetammyjo
Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nosathro Very Well First I would say most would agree that rape is not about sex but domination and subjection Here are a few of my referrences. Also this was cover on History Channel http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/aegean/culture/spartaculture.html The woman was abducted in the night, her head would be shaved, and she was made to wear men's clothing and lye on a straw pallet in the dark. The Role of Spartan Women in Ancient Greece By Lisa Thibault Pietsch Aristotle In their marriages, the husband carried off his bride by a sort of force; nor were their brides ever small and of tender years, but in their full bloom and ripeness. After this, she who superintended the wedding comes and clips the hair of the bride close round her head, dresses her up in man's clothes, and leaves her upon a mattress in the dark; afterwards comes the bridegroom, in his everyday clothes, sober and composed, as having supped at the common table, and, entering privately into the room where the bride lies, unties her virgin zone, and takes her to himself; I wish you well Nosathro There is sub and dom as we use them in BDSM but there this is crime and force -- I don't think they are the same. I don't think rape is about dominance so much as anger and hatred and low self-esteem on the part of the rapist. A man who rapes a woman does not dominate her, he violates her and probably damages her but he isn't her dominant anymore than a guy raping you would be dominating you. I think it's sad if you equate Ds in the BDSM sense with violence, hatred, fear, and force. Aristotle is decribing a marriage rituals, the families arrange the marriages and I fully expect that the brides knew exactly what they were expected to do in that ritual. Why dress in men's clothing? Speculation I've seen says it was to ease the transition from a male to a female sexual partner for the soldier. The two parts of the ritual seem odd. First the "carried off" and then the gender change. It seems like two separate traditions have been married together. How would Aristotle know anyway? If you read him you can see all sorts of problems with most of things he says especially about biology, sexuality, and how societies work. It's like he's heard of things but rarely experienced them himself. I wouldn't trust Aristotle for more than Aristotle on much of anything.
_____________________________
Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains, TammyJo Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/
|