littleonyx
Posts: 657
Joined: 9/10/2006 From: Austin Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LotusSong Sir, First, let me say that I am a dominant white female. Personally, I would have no problem interacting with another race. What inhibits me is the history between our two races. In reality, the whites are constantly being asked to apologize for slavery in the states and told we are the history of our acts way back then. Granted.. BDSM slavery has nothing to do with reality slavery. SPEAKING JUST FOR ME, the seed of guilt has been drummed into us for decades now that I personally could not dominate an African-American slave. Now in converse.. if I were a submissive, I'd be more inclined to submit to a black Master. It could just be the Catholic guilt to pay for the sins of my race. It should be that race plays no part in all of it. I session the whole person.. not their body. This includes their baggage, their hopes and dreams and their history. I've been curious with this type of of pairing- does the thought every even briefly pass one's mind about the past dynamic between the two? Interesting. Very interesting. At one point, a white Master contacted me and said that He wished to have a black female slave. We began to talk, and I was interested in why He only wanted a black slave. He spoke about wanting to have me specifically, but said that His general preference is black women. I asked why, and He said it was because He wanted a "historical" slave. I wondered what He meant and asked for more elaboration. He broke it down to me, and made it clear that He wanted just what He said--the kind of slave that was present centuries ago. If He felt like beating me for any reason, whether I'd been disobedient or not, then He would do so. I was to bear four children for Him--no more, no less (upon asking Him why, He simply stated that He liked the look of "mulatto children"). I was to do the work around the house; not specifically limited to cooking, cleaning, washing clothes, etc., but this included yardwork, maintenance, and other such things. Only when something was beyond my ability was He going to step in, so I had better learn as much as I could--because if He stepped in to do something, and it was something that I could've done myself, then I would be in for a very severe beating. If He wished to have me sexually, then He would do so--which doesn't sound abnormal I know--but if I resisted or hesitated for any reason (sickness, menstural cycle, or whatever) then I would be beaten, taken anyway, and then beaten again. And I'm not talking about a slap on the face. I mean beating. There would be name calling, of course. If He chose to shout out, "Hey, n_ _ _ _ _ girl!" or, simply, "N _ _ _ _ _!" I was to respond with, "Yes Master? The n _ _ _ _ _ girl is here, Master!" My point is, He was upfront and honest about what He wanted from me. Needless to say, I respectfully declined. Would the shocked reactions of some have been just as great if it was a black Master wanting a white slave? *shrugs* Eh. Many times I've had messages from Them, asking if I wanted a white Master. Or, I would be asked if I minded that They were white. And my question was this: Should I mind? Personally, I don't think so. I even get mail here asking if I like white Masters. And I'm thinking, "You mean, over a black one?" In my opinion, it's a preference thing. As Elusive1 said, race play is very edgy (I'm not sure if I agree with the whole "but so amazing to be a part of" part, but oh well). And if people are into race play, then I think that it needs to be acknowledged and understood that it is just that--play. I think that anyone that wants to get into race play solely for the pure enjoyment of seriously hurting the partner because of their race (and this isn't limited to black and white) should definitely be avoided. But that's just my $0.02. little onyx
_____________________________
onyx [ˈoniks] noun a type of precious stone with layers of different colours
|