Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Superiority of western culture?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Superiority of western culture? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/5/2007 9:19:06 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
I'm too tired to dive into this interesting thread seriously, but I can't resist sharing a quip from Mohandas Gandhi. Asked what he thought of western civilization he replied, "I think it would be a good idea."

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 4:11:01 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
So, to sum up the 10 points laid before you:

1) You've declined the offer to put forward an opinion on the funding of militia groups in Nicaragua. A blatant subversion of a nation's sovereignty. This is not a shining example of the virtues of Western culture.

2) The 2nd point put before you is this: is lying about WMDs in order to invade a country and kill people a shining example of culture? - your response is: there were no WMDs, but there were torture houses.

Merc, we all know Saddam was a tyrant who tortured and murdered Iraqis - you're offering nothing new and simply attempting to divert the thread. In terms of Western culture, lies and propaganda propagated in order to invade a country and kill people, is morally bankrupt. The Downing Street Memo is available for you to read - it will give you an insight into the dealings that prepared the foundations for Iraq. Also, try my thread on Nicaragua and offer an opinion on this shining example of Western culture and US politicians. Iraq is a re-run of Nicaragua, so this will give you some grounding into the driving force behind US foreign policy.

3) We agree that nations impeding the sovereignty of other nations is not a shining example of culture. We have common ground here. As said originally, we could do with taking a look in the mirror and sorting out our own problems, starting with the corrupt politicians who are prepared to kill people in a desire to spread their view of the world.

4) The fourth point was around corruption in the West, political parties being bought. One of Ellen's questions is: is western culture perfect enough for us to export it with good intention?
 
My understanding is this: there is significant pressure in the US for a reform of campaign finance. Where corporations are influencing politics and foreign policy it is clear that the US does not have a perfect culture to export abroad. Where Enron and other firms can dupe the public on such a large scale, it is clear that all is not rosy in the garden - certainly not rosy enough to be pointing to it as a shining example of culture.

5) On the 5th point - executing US citizens: your reply is they are guilty. A) They are not all guilty and there have been recent miscarriages of justice where people have lost their lives B) The developed world is of the opinion that an "eye for an eye" belongs in the middle ages, and society has a duty towards rehabilitation. As a nation, you're pretty much on your own on this one, and my understanding is there are states in the US that would rather not execute its citizens. The lack of compassion towards citizens is not particularly civilised and culturally enlightening.

6) My point about having 3rd world areas inside the US: your reply is "no one is stopping them" and a lazy attempt to discredit my point of view by claiming I recite the BBC's position. There are parts of Los Angeles, Chicago, New Orleans etc where people are living in serious poverty. A culturally enlightened nation would attempt to understand and resolve the factors underlying this poverty. Attempting to claim they are lazy amounts to short-sighted, reactionary politics which will never get to the root of the problem. I'm curious, do you believe that black Americans are offered a level playing field in the US?

7) I point out approx 1.5 million homeless in the US and 200,000 in the UK - your reply is to turn it into a pissing contest between the US and UK - my point was/is: both are shocking examples of the flawed culture of the West - where wealth creation is placed above humanity. I couldn't care less which of the two is worse, it's hard to tell, the point is - the West, including the UK and the US should be sorting out these problems before the self-proclaimation that our culture is a shining example to the world.

8) Point 8 was around inequality while the rich have more money than they know what to do with. I can respect your position here - you believe that wealth redistribution should not impede the concept of individuality. I don't agree with you, but I think this is an area where you put forward a strong argument. My point of view is this: if we live in a place where flowers can cost £200,000, while the homeless are stepped over on the way to buying those flowers, then there is a failure of morals and ethics. A failure of the very foundations that the West is supposed to be built on i.e. democracy. Democracy was intended as a reaction to the dire poverty experienced under monarchs - now we are experiencing poverty under corporations and society is prepared to excuse this on the basis of "individuality". If the day comes when Britain or the US is truly democratic, then Western demoracy can be put forward as a beacon of hope for those ruled by tyrants.

9) The 9th point was election fixing: your response is to claim I follow like a sheep. There have been widespread suggestions of election fixing in your press - Ohio and Florida spring to mind. I'll concede I cannot prove this, nor be certain, as I'm not close enough to the issue. There are widespread suggestions however and the wise move would be to look into this and understand what is going on rather than claim "sheep".

10) My point about people turning away from politics and democracy. You claim they are lazy, stupid or happy with the way things are going. If they're lazy and stupid, then the West has an education issue with its citizens and could do with educating them before spouting cultural enlightenment. If they are happy with the way things are going, then sections of the West are lacking moral fibre - being happy with corporations buying politicians, lying about WMDs in order to pave the way for killing people, rampant consumerism and a widening wealth gap with a high rate of homelessness are not issues on which a culturally enlightened society would be happy about.

In conclusion, when the West is a shining example of culture, then put it forward as such. Until then, get you own house in order first and foremost. There's no shame in accepting that there's work to be done in the garden. It's called self-development. Hoarding skeletons in the cupboard is a recipe for stagnation at the expense of cultural enlightenment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

You are so much fun! THANKS!



Merc, I don't really go in for drama and the random use of capitals - not my style. A relaxed chat is good enough for me.

Edited to add:

Merc, you've tried to divert this thread towards a chat on the relationship between civil liberties, freedom and government regulation. Feel free to start a thread on this topic and I'll take you up on the offer.

< Message edited by NorthernGent -- 4/6/2007 4:19:41 AM >


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 6:30:26 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

I'm too tired to dive into this interesting thread seriously, but I can't resist sharing a quip from Mohandas Gandhi. Asked what he thought of western civilization he replied, "I think it would be a good idea."


So even Gandhi might have been moderated on these boards then for flaming, baiting and overall childish behavior...

And I always thought that he was a really nice guy, too.

< Message edited by Sanity -- 4/6/2007 6:36:08 AM >

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 7:14:42 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
1 - To me discussing Nicaragua in context of the OP would be the same as discussing Italy in context of Roman conquest. Unless taken completely in context with everything else occurring at the time all arguments are tangent. I'll plead guilty to laziness at not wanting to waste time to go back and put myself in a mindset of 1980's USA. But in general any type of action, whether it is backing one faction in a civil war or giving aid to a government as long as they will vote favorably with you in a UN resolution is "blatant subversion". The US should end both, aid and militia funding.

2 - If you believe in a god you won't know if you are correct until you die and get there. I'm written on many occasions that President Bush and those supporting his action into Iraq with there votes in Congress decided to act upon "intelligence" that said there were WMD instead of the "intelligence" that said there wasn't. The result was there has been no discovery of WMDs. It was not a lie. The decision was wrong. If you see this as a semantic argument fine. If there is no god after death, it would be the same semantics. Meanwhile, at least initially, Iraqi's were free of one source of death that to those killed had the same effect as a WMD. The USA should have left the same day President Bush landed on the carrier and let the locals get on with there centuries old, three way, civil war.

3- Sure - we're close enough. Isolationism is possible in this era.

4 - I don't believe any US or "western" example of culture should be imposed upon any other sovereignty. At the same time I don't believe any group of people immigrating to the west should impose their culture on the US. On most issues you'll find I only desire reciprocity. No "special" consideration of the Muslim religion, no consideration for bi-lingual signs or education.

Unfortunately the "pressure" on finance reform comes from special interest groups. The last "reform" had the effect of eliminating any major public office coming from the "common man". There is no way to raise funds to do so. The last reform was supposed to have the exact opposite effect. It was a shinning example of lawyers working in the private sector working circles around the lawyers working as politicians. PAC's became the vogue and "soft money" entered into the political dictionary. It is no better than third world corruption, nor a shinning example. The evidence is who ends up on the ballot and decisions of the lessor of two evils.

5 - Again speaking in the current times. It is damn near impossible to execute an innocent man/woman. If there is a miscarriage it is that the people who were victims had to wait so long for justice. You place value on the criminal, I place the most important value on what happened to the victim.

6 - Yes people are living in poverty. But people can move themselves out of it. And yes, I do believe that any American of any color or cultural background can achieve anything. I believe the social engineering programs are counter productive because is assumes people need assistance. You tell someone they are inferior long enough they are likely to believe it. I'm sure I'm subject to prejudice, I'm sure you are too; choosing to quit in the face of it is surrendering. Lazy comes into play too.

7 - I don't remember bringing the UK into it, but no matter. The day there is no "help wanted" signs in many business windows and no ads in the newspaper I'll concede that people are homeless because there is nothing they can do about it. Until then, I'll argue its a conscience decision.

8 - Democracy is a matter of equal opportunity and access not equal distribution of wealth.

9 - My point was losers complain about results. There have been some good ideas how to make the process less subject to fraud. As much as I hate bringing up the past, JFK was elected because 100,000 dead people voted in Chicago. Should the history books be changed and Nixon put in as the winner of 1960? Here in CA it is estimated that as much as 10% of the voters are illegal aliens. Some places where this occurs are under Republican control others Democratic. I believe it "sheepish" to follow any conspiracy theory that happens to support why "your side" failed.

10 - "Happy" no, pragmatic is my perspective. You touched upon the "lazy and stupid" references why ignore "complacent and content"? Freedom includes the freedom to do nothing. Would the 100% vote in Iraq or the USSR or anywhere such a turnout occurs indicate something different? I applaud the Australian example in concept but my fundamental desire against laws dictating action precludes me from agreeing with it. I do not put voting as an indication of the "fiber" of our citizens.

I made no argument of "superiority". I do not feel it is a requirement. I especially don't think we should have or should export democracy. I am pragmatic on the faults and strengths of western culture in general and USA culture specifically. My argument is very basic - there is no better. There is no such list of oppression for woman or any other group in the west as there is within Islam. There is no death or sterilization for the second child born to a family as there is in China. There is no government sanctions genocide of a religion or people as there is in Dafur. There is no other "shinning example" better in the past or present.

Can it be better? Sure. Is it as bad as you make it out to be? No way. Can those thinking it is "okay" work with those who think it sucks? I don't think so. Most on both sides, polarized to the extreme, see it as you. They read only sources that support their positions and call "conspiracy" any fact in opposition. Pity.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 9:41:15 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Most on both sides, polarized to the extreme, see it as you. They read only sources that support their positions and call "conspiracy" any fact in opposition. Pity.



For a self-proclaimed proponent of individuality, you do more than your fair share of speaking for other people. Those doing the reading know what they do and do not read. As you're the self-proclaimed proponent of personal space, it is not a wise move to attempt to speak for others.

On the rest of your post, come back to me when your manners improve (as displayed in your quote above).



_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 10:03:28 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
After reading this entire thread ...
 
a) I completely agree with you NG. American is as bad as you paint it, and more. The people trying to defend it, just haven't been exposed to it's darker side.
 
b) you aren't American, so mind your own fucking business. 

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 10:35:08 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

I'm too tired to dive into this interesting thread seriously, but I can't resist sharing a quip from Mohandas Gandhi. Asked what he thought of western civilization he replied, "I think it would be a good idea."


So even Gandhi might have been moderated on these boards then for flaming, baiting and overall childish behavior...

And I always thought that he was a really nice guy, too.


Oh, I think the Gandhi line is awfully tame for CM.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 10:44:39 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

After reading this entire thread ...
 
a) I completely agree with you NG. American is as bad as you paint it, and more. The people trying to defend it, just haven't been exposed to it's darker side.
 
b) you aren't American, so mind your own fucking business. 



I have to hold my hands up and concede that the opportunity to use a PC from within the walls of your air raid shelter is testament to US culture.

When your gang of lunatics retreat to within their borders, I'll revert back to not knowing, or caring, about anything that goes on within the US. With the exception of a few bands that are worth some time.

One of these days, Caitlyn, you and I are going to get along like pigs in shit.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 10:47:41 PM   
hisannabelle


Posts: 1992
Joined: 12/3/2006
From: Tallahassee, FL, USA
Status: offline
greetings,

this is just a general observation on this situation based on some recent research into one aspect of arab culture.

i recently had to do a presentation on a particular modern movement in arab poetics, and through doing so, ended up reading some stuff by adonis (ali ahmed said), one of the poets who is also a culture critic, among other things. he attempted to devise a whole new response, not only artistically but sociologically, culturally, and politically, to western influence, based on the fact that he felt the west was too forward looking and the arab world too backward looking. his approach was basically that coming to know each other not on the basis of ideology as a whole but on the basis of being able to connect with certain things in the other culture rather than rejecting the culture as a whole would make things a lot easier - for both sides. for him, as an arab, he felt that the arab world should, rather than completely rejecting technological advancement or let it water down their cultural experience to the point where their kids were raised in an ipod culture, so to speak, remember their heritage but still allow techonological advancement insofar as it could improve their lives. if you're interested in his viewpoint, he expresses a lot of his thoughts on this a lot better than i ever could in "an introduction to arab poetics" (while the first part explains a lot about arab poetry and by extension arab culture, the last part is really a commentary on how poetics and culture reflect each other, and how the arab world and the west can constructively relate to each other...it's also a very short book, less than a hundred pages).

anyway, i just wanted to post this since arab/western cultural relations have been on my mind lately due to this (and some other things) and i thought some might find it interesting.

annabelle.

< Message edited by hisannabelle -- 4/6/2007 10:48:23 PM >


_____________________________

a'ishah (the artist formerly known as annabelle)
i have the kind of beauty that moves...

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 11:00:40 PM   
Griswold


Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Its coming up in a few threads now, the idea that the west is so predisposed to thinking its culture is the pinnacle of human civilisation that this is at least one of the reasons it is being forcefully spread across the world, and that this in turn is the reason why so many worldwide dislike the west, feeling threatened by this pressure to conform and so resisting it and actively striking back - the most vocal opposition arising in Islam and particularly causing the growth of fundamentalism in that religion.

But are we truly in possession of the highest form of human culture? Certainly we are in possession of the most efficient form of wealth creation - though not necessarily wealth distribution. Certainly we are in possession of representative democracy, which seems to be a sensible form of administering countries, though this is all to often controlled by outside agencies like business and media rather than us. Certainly we are in possession of personal freedoms, yet we find them severely curtailed by laws and regulations as well as the necessities of life in a market economy - and there are some who abuse these freedoms just for the sake of it. Certainly we have a socially aware system in which those experiencing misfortune are provided with a safety net in terms of social benefits and medical care in most places, but this is wide open to abuse too.

I feel we have a lot going for us, and yet I cant help but think that we have just as many faults too, as it is with other cultures. Since Islam is the main talking point in this regard, we can say with ease that their approaches towards women, homosexualty and a host of other issues are major faults from a simple, non partisan human perspective, yet they also have financial services that do not rely on interest and they have in the main respect and cohesion in their societies, both of which we do not have and would be of benefit to us.

I also remember when the eastern bloc crumbled, talking to a Czech friend at the time, overwhelmed with anticipation for the western lifestyle, and telling him that it would be a mistake to think that all is well with western culture and that the country would be well served to retain a strong socialist influence if it wanted to avoid some of the problems we have. They didnt listen.

So,
is western culture perfect enough for us to export it with good intention?
is there anything western culture could and should learn from other cultures?

E


You assume that what we want is what they want.

Western culture is exactly what we want....it's most clearly not what they want.

< Message edited by Griswold -- 4/6/2007 11:01:31 PM >

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 11:06:07 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

anyway, i just wanted to post this since arab/western cultural relations have been on my mind lately due to this (and some other things) and i thought some might find it interesting.

annabelle.


It was interesting. It's reasonable to assume that the Western and Arabic worlds do not hold irreconcilable differences.

There is a huge Western influence in certain sections of the Arab world. If you were to go to the UAE, you would see huge shopping malls selling only expensive Western items. These items are lapped up by Jordanians, Syrians, Lebanese, Palestinians etc. The cinemas stock ice creams advertised as made in London and other products advertised as made in New York. Many of the wealthy arabs are Western educated. Many of the revolutionaries have been inspired by Western ideals - for example, the Iranian revolution was driven by a man who studied at Paris and learned the ideals of the French revolution and modern day would-be revolutionaries - particularly Jean-Paul Satre. The key slogan of the Iranian revolution being "armed struggle is the road to freedom" - this is an entirely Western concept.

We're not that different.


< Message edited by NorthernGent -- 4/6/2007 11:07:37 PM >


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to hisannabelle)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/6/2007 11:25:42 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
 

I am not sure whether this is germane to the thread in question apart from tangentially, but I just finished reading the part of "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond where he discusses the issue of genocide.

Apparently, other primates will lie in wait for, and kill, or badly beat, members of other groups of same species primates.  He lists dozens of examples of this.  While their approach is rudimentary, their strategizing limited, they lack a language to fully rationalize their behavior, but the thing they lack are weapons of mass destruction.

The parts of the major religions I studied in college which appealed to me involved concepts like mercy, forgiveness, peace, altruism, turning the other cheek, helping those weaker than oneself, trying to live on a higher moral plane, etc.  The part which did not appeal to me were the historical examples of religions (among other things) where the true believers went to war to slaughter the infidel.

Apparently, homo sapiens did not fall far from the evolutionary tree in our xenophobia.

Sinergy


_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 5:24:14 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
An interesting comment Sinergy, because we do behave exactly like chimps in that way.

We are social animals, like chimps. We are unable to live alone in that we require the assistance of others, whether that be in our early days as hunter gatherers or nowadays when we need someone to sort our food delivery and sanitation out. Were we solitary animals, we would never have got to where we are now. Instead we band together for mutual support and form, in theory at least, coherent and viable units for survival. The problem comes when our coherent and viable unit comes into contact with another coherent and viable unit, and there is competition for limited resources - berries and buffalo in our early days, concert tickets and bread in our daily lives and oil and trade on a global basis nowadays.

Our units have also become much larger than at any other time in our history, with the result that we identify far more strongly with our micro units of friends and family and likeminders than we do with our macro units of state or country, and end up in conflict at the micro level which divides the macro unit. Yet in terms of survival, the macro unit remains necessary in that we would otherwise not be as viable as competitive macro units - we need to be able to match or exceed the power of other macro units to avoid destruction.

Given this, all of our culture is simply that of a macro unit which is in competition with other macro units. Our culture is then naturally superior to that of the other macro units, in that it provides the framework in which we have a place and in that it is our means of survival, when compared to other macro units where we have no place and whose ability and willingness to provide for us is unknown. But, we only got ourselves into today's macro units by way of the assimilation or annihilation of other units in the past - every European country on the map and the US and Canada have that history, which in terms of this subject are culturally adapted to assimilation or annihilation of those macro units with which they come into conflict.

This doesnt make our macro unit superior though such that it has a moral right to assimilate or annihilate. Rather, this is the way our macro unit goes about its contacts with other macro units when there is competition or rivalry, and as recent history at least has shown, our model seems to be successful in its method, having built nation states out of smaller units and exterminated those who would not be assimilated.

Other macro units may vary in their approach. The imperial Japanese for instance, seemingly had the idea of annihilation of other units, and it may well be that our current target for assimilation in Islam may understand the world in the same way, explaining the impasse and hostility against us - their culture might be one in which assimilation is not an option in the clash of cultures.
E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 6:11:47 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Most on both sides, polarized to the extreme, see it as you. They read only sources that support their positions and call "conspiracy" any fact in opposition. Pity.



For a self-proclaimed proponent of individuality, you do more than your fair share of speaking for other people. Those doing the reading know what they do and do not read. As you're the self-proclaimed proponent of personal space, it is not a wise move to attempt to speak for others.

On the rest of your post, come back to me when your manners improve (as displayed in your quote above).

Another obtuse misdirection from you. You are most entertaining, and very predictable especially when exposed and you have no intelligent response. You answer as you are - blind and perhaps angry about it, ultimately boring. My manners? Amazing! 

Sorry the comment hit too close to home. How's that for manners?

But again you do amuse me and make me laugh - THANKS! (I used caps just for you!)

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 6:28:50 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
I'm too tired to dive into this interesting thread seriously, but I can't resist sharing a quip from Mohandas Gandhi. Asked what he thought of western civilization he replied, "I think it would be a good idea."


Nitpicka that I am I think you missed out a bit...
I believe the quote should be.....
Western Civilisation ? would be a good idea, they should try it sometime.
Your welcome !

Look what happened to the Mahatma, murdered by a Muslim moderate living in the tolerant Indian state.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 6:58:45 AM   
FangsNfeet


Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
The King and I

Scene: Anna is helping the king plan an event where several high figures of England/Europe attend dinner in the Kings eastern home land.

Anna: Your majesty, I suggest that we use silverware for the dinner.

King: You're right. The Western World is not sophisticated enough to use chop sticks.

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 7:12:31 AM   
Padriag


Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

7) Something like 1.5 homeless in the US and 200,000 in the UK?
And 5,000,000 jobs in the US. Must be a function of free choice, laziness, or preference.

Hate to spoil such a lovely bit of bickering with something as pedestrian as facts... but officially for 2006 the number of homeless in the US was 744,000.  According to the UN World Census, the US ranks lowest world wide for homelessness at 0.33 percent.

Among the US homeless, drug addiction is the leading cause.

The highest rates of homelessness were in Asia and Africa, where simple overpopulation was the leading cause.

We now return you to your bickering.

_____________________________

Padriag

A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 7:15:53 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
At what point do you think the US started to decline as a country?

Do you think that individuality is a bad thing? To become less than individuals means to give more control to government. Is this not what many socialistic and communistic leaders wished? If you give up your personal freedoms and liberties (individuality) then you give up more control of your lives, who would take this control?

Do you believe the US should stop involving themselves in other countries politics and such? If so, then does not aid to other countries also influence their politics in some shape or fashion?

Money is a bad thing? I think greed may be but money is not. To work harder and gain more for harder work is essential for the human race to stay on the top of the food chain. If everyone were equal and gained equal things, we would all live in the same house, drive the same car, have the same amount of property, etc. If this is a belief of yours then if a homeless person walked up to you, would you give them half of everything you own so the two of you could now be equal?

Do I believe the Western culture is superior? For the West I do. A culture is supperior for that culture because social evolution will change it as is necessary for the species to survive.


Orion

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 7:17:11 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
Oh pig shit ...
 
This has nothing to do with what we do around the world. Someone mentions healthcare, gun control, cities, football, music, movies ... just about fucking anything ... and you go into full on bash the USA mode.
 
Repeat after me ...
I can stop being my brother's keeper ...
I can stop being my brother's keeper ...
I can stop being my brother's keeper ...
 
All in good fun, by the way.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Superiority of western culture? - 4/7/2007 7:31:35 AM   
Padriag


Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Money is a bad thing?

Money does not corrupt... it only magnifies what was already there.

_____________________________

Padriag

A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Superiority of western culture? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094