Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Immediate sex?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Immediate sex? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 9:32:00 AM   
julietsierra


Posts: 1841
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavetrainer2007

While i have had  sex on the first  meeting, the dynamics of the relationship just worked out that way. Their is nothing wrong with having sex with someone on your first meeting(or second).....if its what you want to do.

The question is this: Do you really want to be with  a dom that has concentration problems when his winkie is hard?If he is that easily distracted, he may get  you nude and forget all about doming you.

This to me sounds like a desperate cry for sex. And  is a poor excuse for sex( and their arent many in my opinion). I think its safe to say that any dom that needs to get off so he can concentrate on being a "master" is no where near the point of being a master of anything.In my opinion, I would seek a new dom, or at least use extreme caution with this one.


rofl...

And I just figured it was a simply play for sex. Hey, ask...if the answer is no, then it's no. If the answer is yes, then it sounds like a fun night. Weaker pick up lines have worked before. That's why they're pick up lines...

If the woman goes for it, then it's not a lame line. If she doesn't, just shrug and toss that line out again. No big deal.

Women have fallen for less. This sounds like a man who's very much aware of that and more than likely, it's worked before for him. If the RIGHT man has said the same thing, I'd be willing to bet that it would have worked. As it was, evidently, the wrong man said that and well... that was that. No sense in lambasting someone for trying.

Or are you saying that the trying was good, but the line itself was weak?

If that's the case, then I'd like to point out that I'm an EXCELLENT writer. It's not a brag, it's the simple truth. On every test I've ever taken, I've scored perfect scores on my writing skills. I organize my writing and seem to be able to find just exactly the right thing to say when I want to make a point. However, it does not make me any better or worse,  weaker or stronger than the next person who perhaps has a more difficult time getting said what they want to say. It just makes them less understood - which just might be the case with this guy. 

And know what? His line, lame or not, will work with someone. As a dominant, he'll eventually find someone that he clicks with, if that's his intention. And if it isn't, he'll find someone to hop into bed with.

Other than that, if he doesn't work for you, then he doesn't work for you and it's best to just keep on looking.

juliet

(in reply to Slavetrainer2007)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 9:36:08 AM   
jaymckenas


Posts: 146
Joined: 4/10/2007
Status: offline
Imho, there are far more rewarding pursuits through this sort of a relationship than that of sexual gratification. The idea is to have just that, a relationship, and if you feel that the second date has allowed you to enter into a deep and meaningful relationship than the ultimate answer to the question posed is yes, by your own admission. However, the logical reasoning provided by the individual, his explantation for desiring sex, is completely remiss. Being a Master is not hindered by not having a sexually charged relationship, mainly because in my view the act of being a Master is a deeper sensation that requires forming a bond with the individual under his charge. I am a newbie to this all though, so perhaps my opinions are merely the misguided thoughts of inexperience, if so feel free to let me know.

But in BDSM, as in life, at least my personal philosophy is,
There's so much more than sex.

cheers,
Jay

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 9:39:16 AM   
WiseCracknSadist


Posts: 163
Joined: 10/27/2006
Status: offline
Oh man, if you're gonna fall for a line like that I've got a few things you can do for me to get out of the way.

Sounds like that old if you love me you'll sleep with me routine from high school just dressed up fpr the bdsm world.

It all depends who you are. There are plenty of women who sleep with guys on the first date. If you're not into him then just let it go. If you're wanting more time to get comfortable, tell him. If he persists show him the door. You've not agreed to be his and you still have all your rights.

(in reply to BRNaughtyAngel)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 9:57:51 AM   
grlneedstolearn


Posts: 728
Joined: 1/29/2007
Status: offline
i'd be cautious, but again it goes back to my past and not trusting guys until the 4th or 5th time we're together.

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 10:58:14 AM   
Slavetrainer2007


Posts: 231
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: julietsierra

quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavetrainer2007

While i have had  sex on the first  meeting, the dynamics of the relationship just worked out that way. Their is nothing wrong with having sex with someone on your first meeting(or second).....if its what you want to do.

The question is this: Do you really want to be with  a dom that has concentration problems when his winkie is hard?If he is that easily distracted, he may get  you nude and forget all about doming you.

This to me sounds like a desperate cry for sex. And  is a poor excuse for sex( and their arent many in my opinion). I think its safe to say that any dom that needs to get off so he can concentrate on being a "master" is no where near the point of being a master of anything.In my opinion, I would seek a new dom, or at least use extreme caution with this one.


rofl...

And I just figured it was a simply play for sex. Hey, ask...if the answer is no, then it's no. If the answer is yes, then it sounds like a fun night. Weaker pick up lines have worked before. That's why they're pick up lines...

If the woman goes for it, then it's not a lame line. If she doesn't, just shrug and toss that line out again. No big deal.

Women have fallen for less. This sounds like a man who's very much aware of that and more than likely, it's worked before for him. If the RIGHT man has said the same thing, I'd be willing to bet that it would have worked. As it was, evidently, the wrong man said that and well... that was that. No sense in lambasting someone for trying.

Or are you saying that the trying was good, but the line itself was weak?

If that's the case, then I'd like to point out that I'm an EXCELLENT writer. It's not a brag, it's the simple truth. On every test I've ever taken, I've scored perfect scores on my writing skills. I organize my writing and seem to be able to find just exactly the right thing to say when I want to make a point. However, it does not make me any better or worse,  weaker or stronger than the next person who perhaps has a more difficult time getting said what they want to say. It just makes them less understood - which just might be the case with this guy. 

And know what? His line, lame or not, will work with someone. As a dominant, he'll eventually find someone that he clicks with, if that's his intention. And if it isn't, he'll find someone to hop into bed with.

Other than that, if he doesn't work for you, then he doesn't work for you and it's best to just keep on looking.

juliet


Those women that fall for the weak pickup lines.. arent really falling for the line , in my opinion. If you have an interest in someone any pick up line they give you will probably work. if you dont the best pick up line wont.

Then again you have to remember this isnt a vanilla relationship, we are dealing with. When a dom says i wanna fuck you and get it out of the way so i can concentrate on being a master you have to  wonder if its someone you want to fuck.

Look at whats involved in many/most D/s relationships. Subs are put in vulnerable postions during sex/play  Is this someone one you would let play with you when you vulnerable? Someone you could trust? Obviously, he seem to only care about getting his winkie wet. So what happens  after he gets his frustration out of the way? Next meeting he again needs to get his winkie wet so he can concetrate and repeat?

Hell ask if that works cause if it does im going to use it on every sub i  can find. Fuck um',  talk to them a few minutes about  me controlling them go home relax  do it all over again.

I dont think he really wants to dom, i think he wants to use you for sex. Ive seen it to many times. And being a guy i know how guys think. They see something that works to get a woman in bed they will use it till it stops working with that woman and then move on. this is just a fancy version of "put out or get out", in my opinion.

Edit: Heres an idea hand him a pic of you and a bottle of astroglide. Tell him to go to the bathroom and  get his sexual frustrations out of the way, so you can continue the relationship. Then tell him if you want me to get your sexual frustrations out for you, you have to earn it.

< Message edited by Slavetrainer2007 -- 4/14/2007 11:01:20 AM >


_____________________________

Life is given, Everything else is earned.

(in reply to julietsierra)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 12:28:20 PM   
happypervert


Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/11/2004
From: Scranton, PA
Status: offline
quote:

Should I be careful with a Dom who wants to have sex on the second date?

Yes. You should be careful not to bite when his prick is in your mouth.


_____________________________

"Get a bicycle. You will not regret it if you live." . . . Mark Twain

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 12:28:47 PM   
Celeste43


Posts: 3066
Joined: 2/4/2006
From: NYS
Status: offline
There is no right or wrong answer. If knowing upfront that you are sexually compatible is important for him, then his feelings are valid. If you prefer to wait until the rest of compatibility is established before having sex, then your feelings are equally valid. You folks either have to agree to have a few more dates before deciding or you agree that you aren't compatible.

(in reply to BRNaughtyAngel)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 1:27:24 PM   
Suleiman


Posts: 1127
Joined: 9/9/2004
Status: offline
???

I don't think I'd trust someone incapable of dealing with their own frustrations to deal with me.

_____________________________

Think of my verbosity as a sort of litmus test for our relationship. I write in a manner identical to how I speak and how I think. If you can not cope with what I have written here, it is probably for the best if we go our separate ways.

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 1:33:38 PM   
julietsierra


Posts: 1841
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavetrainer2007

Those women that fall for the weak pickup lines.. arent really falling for the line , in my opinion. If you have an interest in someone any pick up line they give you will probably work. if you dont the best pick up line wont.



That's the point I was trying to make. The best and the worst pick up lines work only when the person they're being used on has an interest in the people useing them in the first place. The fact that she was not drawn to that pick up line showed her more about herself than about him. Lots of people use pick up lines. Sometimes they work; sometimes they don't. And just SOMETIMES... even though they worked, a simple glance would have done the trick too because that's where the target of the pick up line was wanting to go in the first place.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavetrainer2007

Then again you have to remember this isnt a vanilla relationship, we are dealing with. When a dom says i wanna fuck you and get it out of the way so i can concentrate on being a master you have to  wonder if its someone you want to fuck.


I think the decision to fuck is something that is made long before the pick up line is thrown out there - whether the person issuing the pick up line is a dominant or not. In the scenario I gave earlier about a similar pick up line (story) I was given, the end result was very different from the OP's. I knew what he was doing. I thought the story was cute, but I'd have gone with him, with or without the story. 


quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavetrainer2007
Look at whats involved in many/most D/s relationships. Subs are put in vulnerable postions during sex/play  Is this someone one you would let play with you when you vulnerable? Someone you could trust? I dont think he really wants to dom, i think he wants to use you for sex. Ive seen it to many times.


Again, my answer to your questions here would be a resounding "YES!" Certainly I've been given pick up lines and walked away laughing. Certainly, like the OP, I've been disdainful of the men who've issued some of those pick up lines. But when I've actually sat down to think about what was so funny or disdainful about these men, I've had to admit that there were a lot of other things beyond a simple pick up line. The pick up lines were simply the last straw - or perhaps, you could say the confirmation of what I was already thinking.

See, in my world, for better or for worse, I like sex. I like it a LOT. My relationship has a lot of sex intrinsic to it. I'd spent nearly a year in a completely sex-less marriage and prior to that, it'd been 17 years of missionary only sex. Then, I went through a long period of time (make that a LOOOOONG period of time) with no sex whatsoever. Sex was/is/will always be important to me. And yes, it was/is/will always be just as important as the D/s and the SM and all that is to me. So, when I saw the person who I fell for, the person I serve, the person I call Master, the person I LOVE, at an event that previous weekend, it was the culmination of nearly two years of watching the doors to see if he'd come in (I'd met him for a few minutes two years prior and if he'd have used that pick up line on me THEN, I'd have gone with him in an instant then too).

When I watched him drive past the restaurant on the way to make the turn around to get into the parking lot, I'd known THEN that if he made ANY sort of suggestion for play or sex or both, I'd be accepting (translation: racing him to the door). His pick up line was really just an interesting and humorous story. If he HADN'T suggested the hotel, I'd have been devastated.

And yes, that night, I willingly and with full awareness of what I was doing, stepped into that hotel room, out of my clothes and up against a wall, where he beat me silly and then to the bed where he fucked me royally. In nearly five years now, I've never ever - not ever -  regretted my decision. And he's shown me time and again just how much of a dominant he can be. So his pick up line was never an indication of a lack of ability in the area of dominance either. It was just a pick up line.

In the end, we match. We match about as perfectly as I've ever hoped to find in someone.

And pick up lines are just pick up lines.

So, no, I don't think that you can necessarily make the jump from a play for sex and a lack of dominance (although, yes, it's certainly a possibility. There are certainly a lot of men out there claiming dominance when all they want is a piece of ass). About the only thing anyone can say with any certainty is that in the case of the OP - this one case - he was not the dominant for her.

(See, what I also like is that it places the responsibility for her decision squarely where it belongs - on her. SHE made the decision that he wasn't a good choice for her. SHE made the determination to wait. SHE made the choice between a romp in bed and the possibility for more. And in the end, when SHE makes the right decision for herself, she can be proud that this was a choice SHE made, not one that was made for her.)

juliet


(in reply to Slavetrainer2007)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 3:06:57 PM   
notlooking2


Posts: 53
Joined: 3/17/2007
Status: offline
Or are you saying that the trying was good, but the line itself was weak?

I never blame a man for trying.  I'm mature enough to know that's the name of the game.  I guess what turned me off was the lack of imagination. 


Then again you have to remember this isnt a vanilla relationship, we are dealing with. When a dom says i wanna fuck you and get it out of the way so i can concentrate on being a master you have to  wonder if its someone you want to fuck.

My point exactly.  There is nothing wrong with jumping into the sack on the first or even second date, if that works for both people.  And I have certainly done it in the past.  What confuses me is the fact, when we talked, we both agreed we are looking for a LTR M/s relationship.  And in my humble opinion, that takes time, and shouldn't be rushed into... at least as far as I'm concerned, don't want to make assumptions for others.  And as much as I like sex and play, I just want to build a solid foundation, and know the person I'm submitting too isn't just looking for kinky sex.

Next meeting he again needs to get his winkie wet so he can concetrate and repeat?

Couldn't agree more!!!

Hell ask if that works cause if it does im going to use it on every sub i  can find. Fuck um',  talk to them a few minutes about  me controlling them go home relax  do it all over again.

Doesn't work for this one, lol. 

I dont think he really wants to dom, i think he wants to use you for sex. Ive seen it to many times. And being a guy i know how guys think. They see something that works to get a woman in bed they will use it till it stops working with that woman and then move on. this is just a fancy version of "put out or get out", in my opinion.

Again, couldn't agree more.

Edit: Heres an idea hand him a pic of you and a bottle of astroglide. Tell him to go to the bathroom and  get his sexual frustrations out of the way, so you can continue the relationship. Then tell him if you want me to get your sexual frustrations out for you, you have to earn it.  

ROFLMAO

Thanks for all of your great answer's.  I really appreciate it.

< Message edited by notlooking2 -- 4/14/2007 3:36:03 PM >

(in reply to Slavetrainer2007)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 7:12:56 PM   
MsCfromMelbourne


Posts: 777
Joined: 2/15/2007
Status: offline
A Dom once told me in a  very serious voice  "we need to have sex on the third date or there is a very high risk we will leave it too long and end up only being friends."

I thought "what a creep" but obviously that rubbish works on some women or he wouldn't try it on



_____________________________

<----- Corset, mask and collar designed and manufactured by metalsmith Karl H, chromed and lined in black suede. Masks and collars available from http://www.lucreziadesade.com.au/default.html. Corsets custom made only

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 7:16:20 PM   
MsCfromMelbourne


Posts: 777
Joined: 2/15/2007
Status: offline
BTW you might have instant passion if he is just amazing, sexy and irresistable

All power to you both!!

But it is creepy for a guy to voice it as an expectation (unless he knew that was a fantasy of yours).  It can only backfire.


_____________________________

<----- Corset, mask and collar designed and manufactured by metalsmith Karl H, chromed and lined in black suede. Masks and collars available from http://www.lucreziadesade.com.au/default.html. Corsets custom made only

(in reply to MsCfromMelbourne)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 7:29:05 PM   
PsyVamp


Posts: 1026
Joined: 10/30/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FukinTroll

Methinks he wants to wet his winky and that will be about the end of it. So if didleing is on your agenda, there ya go!
 
I generally spend about a month in c-mail and if I am comfortable I will give out my IM. Eventually we will get to the phone and start working to a meet. I move slow and carefully because I am here for a commitment and there is a lot to absorb and factor in.


That is about the same way I play it.. emails here first then IM and phone contact, intitial meet and more IM's, phone contact.. so it could be a lot of communication before I actually see the person the second time - weeks or months.

And I don't really worry about when I should or if I should have sex with someone.  It really depends on the chemistry and how things progress.
There are some people I have known for a while that I will never engage in any sexual activity, but I do play with them casually.
And then there is the other. 

Psy... who is really in the incorrect geographical location this weekend and really needs to bite someone..(and get bit back)... ..


_____________________________

Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive. .
Could a blue screen of death constitute being defenestrated?
~Owner of wolf~ (one of them, anyway)

(in reply to FukinTroll)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/14/2007 9:07:24 PM   
minnetar


Posts: 1272
Joined: 4/11/2007
Status: offline
my thoughts are that this "Dom" is only interested with sex based on the response.


minnetar

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/15/2007 3:15:32 AM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Would you accept the same explanation from a man who does
not call himself a dominant?  He has two hands and access to
free porn on the Net.  What else does he need to gain control
of himself?

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/15/2007 3:21:08 AM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
That quote really needs to be in your sig line or at least in your
CM journals, spanklette. 


quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

quote:

ORIGINAL: spanklette
If he can't handle the subtleties of trying to get in your pants, how could he possibly handle the subtleties and intricacies involved in trying to get into your head?


STANDS UP AND APPLAUDS LOUDLY


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/15/2007 9:19:39 AM   
notlooking2


Posts: 53
Joined: 3/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: minnetar

my thoughts are that this "Dom" is only interested with sex based on the response.


minnetar



My thought exactly.  Honestely, I knew this to be true, but as I mentioned at the beginning, after looking for such a long time, a girl can doubt herself every now and then. 

Thank you for your reply

(in reply to minnetar)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/15/2007 9:27:00 AM   
notlooking2


Posts: 53
Joined: 3/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Would you accept the same explanation from a man who does
not call himself a dominant?  He has two hands and access to
free porn on the Net.  What else does he need to gain control
of himself?


I wouldn't. I'm thinking as someone mentioned before, this line has worked on someone who bought the crap he fed her.  Too bad that he couldn't see past the blonde hair and big boobs.  There is actually a brain in my head.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/15/2007 9:46:05 AM   
BOUNTYHUNTER


Posts: 9259
Joined: 2/5/2004
Status: offline
Those that come to serve or play aren't vanilla women,they are slaves or subs and know full well that sex will be part of play or service during their visit here...I can see if this hasn'r been discussed before hand and if not so too bad for you, it should have been...as always just the views of this ol" master

_____________________________

US going to hell in a hand basket/

(in reply to notlooking2)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Immediate sex? - 4/15/2007 9:56:03 AM   
notlooking2


Posts: 53
Joined: 3/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

Those that come to serve or play aren't vanilla women,they are slaves or subs and know full well that sex will be part of play or service during their visit here...I can see if this hasn'r been discussed before hand and if not so too bad for you, it should have been...as always just the views of this ol" master


How much time did you spend communicating with each other?  Speaking for myself, I maybe physically attracted to someone to have sex early on.  However, I can not submit my mind to someone I've just met and had very little time getting to know.

I feel, if you're truly interested in building a M/s relationship with me.  Then I should be allowed time.  After all, once I submit, I am giving him the power to say when, where and even with who.  I don't think it's that much to ask for.

Thank you for your input.  I always appreciate hearing how other's feel about a certain subject.

< Message edited by notlooking2 -- 4/15/2007 9:57:36 AM >

(in reply to BOUNTYHUNTER)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Immediate sex? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094