Pulpsmack
Posts: 394
Joined: 4/15/2004 From: Louisiana Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MissSCD My condolences go out to all the families and students of VT. I am stunned that we allow people to purchase asault weapons. Clinton tried to ban them. It did not get passed. Everyone miss understood and thought he was trying to remove all weapons. If we just remove assualt weapons from our society, that would be a start... Archer: I hate to burst your intelligence level because ovbiously you are much more wiser than I am. That is your opinion. Today's moron used a nine mil plus a simi automatic weapon. They have just released that information. Regardless of the fact, today's moron used a weapon that others used who go aroundshooting up schools and public places usually have assualt weapons. They need to go. Again, my condolences to the families and students of VT regardless of their own opinions of assault weapons. The bill the former president tried to pass, and the last I heard, it was not passed, was called the Brady Bill. If it was passed, it needed to be. Oh, and the shooter had a bullet proof vest on. I find that so interesting. Regards, MissSCD Your information on the events is as reliable as your assessment of the issue. 1. The shooter had a 9mm pistol and a .22 pistol as per YOUR Links (Brady Bunch citing CNN story) 2. The shooter didn't have a BP vest. It is a tactical vest that looks "tacticool". It is a nylon vest designed with ammunition pouches, pockets, and holsters for tactical operatives and armchair commandos for the fast access of additional magazines for reloads. They are vulnerable to all bullets Why are you stunned that we are allowed to own "assault rifles"? We are able to own personal aircraft, exotic animals, cars capable of tripling the speed limit, and MILITARY ASSAULT VEHICLES (original jeeps and today's HUMMERS). Oh NO!!!!!!!!! Hello. Welcome to America. We were founded on the pursuit of personal freedoms. If you can't respect that and feel the need to regulate everybody's lives for your safety, might I suggest you turn in the keys to your personal automobile, your personal property, and go start a utopian totalitarian regime somewhere where you can be live worry-free from crime and freedom? If you were actually serious about making life safer for you and your loved ones, you would ban alcohol and regulate motor vehicles as if they were Abrams Tanks. Whoops... we found alcohol prohibitions don’t make alcohol disappear... BUT SURELY, it will work for scary assault rifles! riiiight. Oh and regulating cars...well that just might crimp your personal freedom a tad for your tastes. Forget the fact that your personal freedoms of owning assault vehicles and cars capable of toting drunks over 55mph are putting my loved ones at risk (at a statistically more significant number as well). I suppose it's only right to curtail freedoms that you and your kind personally don't use... typical hypocrisy. So more people who go around shooting in public places use assault rifles, huh? I challenge you to back that up. I defy you to back that up. Ralph McCooter, a 38 y/o disgruntled employee is fed up with his lot in life so he grabs his Ruger Mini-14 and pays a visit to his former workplace. The boss and an intervening bystander get it before the idiot offs himself. This makes CNN, Fox news, and Bush prepares an ad hoc address to the nation at large while the London Philharmonic prepares a dirge. Meanwhile, "Wooksie" Jones knocks off two rival gang members at a Detroit swap meet with his "Glock fotay". We never hear about it, and the Detroit paper might put that on page 4. How many Ralphs occur each year? How many "Wooksies?" Your "facts" and "statistics" reflect the ignorance of the sources you get them from... the sensationalistic media. Schools, malls, and disgruntled white nutcases bind the audience, not the daily slayings of urban youth. Today in New Orleans we have witnessed about as many murders and there will be as many tomorrow. None of them will see the light of day and virtually all of them will have been committed by handguns. In addition, your beloved Clinton ban was aimed at more than "assault weapons". The provisions of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban also banned certain shotguns and magazines for ALL firearms that exceeded 10 rounds, including handguns. I guess we only need 10 bullets right? Moreover, there is new legislation in the making that calls for more than semiautomatic assault weapons. It basically guts sporting/hunting weapons as well. You may have your own personal views and beliefs on the subject (misguided as they may be) but make no mistake... these groups you cite are not interested in the "common sense" regulation they assure their sheep they wish to pass. They are the Al Sharptons of the Second Amendment... intent on regulating firearms to death for the sake of political clout, yet recognizing they must exist in some form or the group will lose its influence.
< Message edited by Pulpsmack -- 4/16/2007 10:13:01 PM >
|