in regards to anal and the sub

in regards to anal and the sub (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master

Message

myobedience -> in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:16:56 PM)
"In regards to Anal sex ~~ Most Doms get there right away. They see it as a submissive act, and a control of the sub. He wants you to know he desires your service, not your ass. He wants you to know you are a sub, not a woman who will have anal sex with him." This is, in part, a message I received (NOT ON CM).... So I was wondering........ 1) Are you a Dom who likes to get to anal sex sooner or later? 2) Is it the best "hole" of submission? (That was shrud, but if you have a different way of saying it, I'm all ears.) 3) Do you, as a dom, look for a girl who is into anal if that is a big plus for you? 4) Could you live without it if the woman just couldnt? 5) Do you consider the submissive woman more important than the submissive act of anal control? Any other thoughts? ~~~Edited to add~~~ Am gonna try to redirect the answers a bit more specifically.... Would you find it within yourself to value her service as submissive and her womanhood, allowing her to know that is what you value first and foremost BEFORE you took her ass? Or is the act of submitting her ass, a value you place on her service??

Stranger1 -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:20:45 PM)
We tend to want what we want. The tighter the hole, the more the average male will enjoy it. If more pussies were as tight as an ass-there might be less of a desire for it, make sense?

MellowSir -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:23:16 PM)
I like to put it anywhere I desire, simple as that......freedom lol

Stranger1 -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:26:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir I like to put it anywhere I desire, simple as that......freedom lol Seriously, what's the use of having a kinky girl you can't do kink with?

napierkoski -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:28:44 PM)
I think my sub offering her ass to Me at any time I want it, is the ultimate sexual submission. And that in turn lets me feel my power over her, and that...I believe...is the whole point to this. Napierkoski (of course that tight hole does feel good )

IrishMist -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:29:39 PM)
It's really amusing when you think about it though. Most Dom's expect anal sex sooner or later. Yet, I would take a guess ( and probably be accurate ) that most submissives/slaves look forward to and enjoy anal sex [8D]

WilliamWizer -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:32:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: myobedience "In regards to Anal sex ~~ Most Doms get there right away. They see it as a submissive act, and a control of the sub. He wants you to know he desires your service, not your ass. He wants you to know you are a sub, not a woman who will have anal sex with him." This is, in part, a message I received (NOT ON CM).... So I was wondering........ 1) Are you a Dom who likes to get to anal sex sooner or later? 2) Is it the best "hole" of submission? (That was shrud, but if you have a different way of saying it, I'm all ears.) 3) Do you, as a dom, look for a girl who is into anal if that is a big plus for you? 4) Could you live without it if the woman just couldnt? 5) Do you consider the submissive woman more important than the submissive act of anal control? Any other thoughts? 1. I don't know. I haven't tried yet. 2. not necesary. I don't even think sex is necesary for submission. 3. no. I don't care if she is into anal. if she is I will try because I like to get new valuable experiences but if it's a hard limit for her it's fine with me to not do it. 4. yes. 5. let me tell you like this. the absolute only thing more important than my submissive (when I have one) is me (but I will probably change my mind the day I become a father)

wetsub4u -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:33:41 PM)
i find it to be a very submissive act on my part .. even enjoyable .. although not orgasmic.

m0rgan -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:37:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Stranger1 We tend to want what we want. The tighter the hole, the more the average male will enjoy it. If more pussies were as tight as an ass-there might be less of a desire for it, make sense? not to me! i want, and maybe i am not like ordinary men, any orifice i place my cock into to be wide open, slippery, very moist and very receptive and accomodating and thrilled to receive it and it's contents and owner, i want it to pulse and sweat and engorge and change colour and squish and make the glorious sounds they can make, and receive willingly and gratefully and at the right time and pace my best efforts to insert my testicles and towards the end, my hips and soul right into it! my hand knows the speed i want, and so does yours, that can be a tight as you like, but i want any female part that wants my male parts to be very accomodating indeed!! i speak only for me!

IrishMist -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:38:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wetsub4u i find it to be a very submissive act on my part .. even enjoyable .. although not orgasmic. I never found it to be a very submissive act; maybe because I enjoy it too much. Now, if you grab the hair, and do some breath play at the same time, it becomes very primal [8D]

myobedience -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:42:27 PM)
Would you find it within yourself to value her service as submissive and her womanhood, allowing her to know that is what you value first and foremost BEFORE you took her ass? Or is the act of submitting her ass, a value you place on her service?? * sigh

myobedience -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:48:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: m0rgan i want, and maybe i am not like ordinary men, any orifice i place my cock into to be wide open, slippery, very moist and very receptive and accomodating and thrilled to receive it and it's contents and owner, i want it to pulse and sweat and engorge and change colour and squish and make the glorious sounds they can make, and receive willingly and gratefully and at the right time and pace my best efforts to insert my testicles and towards the end, my hips and soul right into it! my hand knows the speed i want, and so does yours, that can be a tight as you like, but i want any female part that wants my male parts to be very accomodating indeed!! i speak only for me! As a cumslutcockwhore, this response was delicious and my Sir would agree with you, but ONLY after I knew I was wanted and accepted as the submissive woman I am, valued in His eyes, not just for the fact that I would give every hole without question, but knowing that in doing so, no one hole is more important than the other.

m0rgan -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 12:58:11 PM)
no argument there madam! i speak only for me!

Milivoje -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:02:51 PM)
1) Yes 2) I don't see it as a submission hole ... more like the second vagina. 3) A huge plus 4) No 5) Anal control... I control the entire girl ... not just a part of her.

Suleiman -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:08:02 PM)
I enjoy it, certainly. It can be an act of domination and control, but not always - that depends on the persons involved, dom and sub alike. I certainly do not require it, then again, I do not nessesarily require coitus at all to enjoy myself as a dominant. It truly depends on the submissive - man or woman. (I've noticed a pronounced tendency to bias towards heterosexuality and gender-specific sub-dom roles in posts like these. I never have fully understood monosexuals, and for the most I gave up on fighting this uphill battle, but I do feel the need to point out that this is not limited by gender - with the exception of persons with certian medical conditions, pretty much everyone is a target for anal penetration, whatever their gender or the gender of their dominant)

myobedience -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:15:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Suleiman I enjoy it, certainly. It can be an act of domination and control, but not always - that depends on the persons involved, dom and sub alike. I certainly do not require it, then again, I do not nessesarily require coitus at all to enjoy myself as a dominant. It truly depends on the submissive - man or woman. (I've noticed a pronounced tendency to bias towards heterosexuality and gender-specific sub-dom roles in posts like these. I never have fully understood monosexuals, and for the most I gave up on fighting this uphill battle, but I do feel the need to point out that this is not limited by gender - with the exception of persons with certian medical conditions, pretty much everyone is a target for anal penetration, whatever their gender or the gender of their dominant) Point taken ! We have to choose our battles...and altho I never mean to be gender ~ role or sexuality orientation specific, I have no other orientation to use. Makes me think tho...thank you

Raphael -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:18:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist Now, if you grab the hair, and do some breath play at the same time, it becomes very primal [8D] How else would one do it? boggle But no, to the original poster, I'd say it all depends. I guess I figure if I own a girl I should take her in every way possible, at least once. But since the reactions to it vary tremendously, and everything else is influenced by that, it's hard to say much more without getting very specific. The meaning of the act changes depending on who it is with. With some girls, doing it once a year or less might be a major rite, requiring a lot of buildup and preparation and carrying an enormous impact. With some, it might be a thrice-daily itch-scratching and nothing more. Ultimately submission happens in the soul, not the body.

IrishMist -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:20:52 PM)
quote: How else would one do it? boggle /sigh I was thinking the same thing [8\|]

Phoenix2raven -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:22:45 PM)
1. It makes very little difference to me if she likes, wants or is willing to give her ass up in a hurry or over a long period of time. 2.That depends on the individual some of the subs Ive been with have said anal does nothing for them. On the other hand some have begged for a good hard ass bang 3. Anal isn't a big plus for me. 4. I have lived without it. If she couldn't dew to medical or psychological reasons that would fall inside of RACK or SSC. 5. I consider the submissive woman way more important because anal submission isn't all she offers.

myobedience -> RE: in regards to anal and the sub (4/28/2007 1:25:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phoenix2raven 5. I consider the submissive woman way more important because anal submission isn't all she offers. OMG !! Thank you for being the first one to answer this question... are there amens? or no one else have this opinion?

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875