farglebargle
Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005 From: Albany, NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Casie quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle quote:
ORIGINAL: Casie Haha, sorry had to giggle. But the terroist perform torture, cause permint bodily harm and usually death to our soliders. What we do to get information is a far leap from torture in my opinon Then you'll volunteer your Mother and/or Children for it? Maybe in 5 years you will see them again. Maybe not. If it's "not torture", then it's perfectly fine to subject YOUR FAMILY to it, isn't it? If it's not for everyone, then it's not Equal Protection OR Due Process. If my family new things that could save lifes and refused to speak or if they were a part of a radical group than yes, That's a dishonest qualification, I didn't say that anyone KNEW ANYTHING. And SINCE NOT ONE of the prisoners has been given an ARRAIGNMENT ON CHARGES, it's dishonest to suggest for even a second that they *do* have information which could save lives. Remember, no-one being held as an "enemy combatant" has had ANY charges files, ANY competent counsel, or ANY day in court, and no one knows if THEY know anything? They're NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING until found so in a Court of Law. Why should YOU be treated any different from them? So, back to our scenario. Since whether or not there is even any worthwhile intel to extract, let's say, if your father *supposedly* knew *something*, should... Should your mother be raped to induce him to talk? Should *you* be snatched off the street by US Gov't Agents, raped and threatened with death if it would induce him to talk? It's only one or two more lives vs. thousands, according to your logic, isn't it?
< Message edited by farglebargle -- 6/26/2007 5:47:20 PM >
_____________________________
It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show. ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים
|