Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 5/31/2007 7:42:55 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover
Wow, u made me cry more than LafayetteLady! I recognize myself in that girl you knew--it makes me feel even more hopeless than I did before: some ppl really do stay miserable forever. It is hard, tho, to enjoy something that your brain tells u is wrong to enjoy. At least I know why I hate it; doesn't make it any easier to accept tho.

I still haven't heard one tip or piece of advice on how to accept humiliation as a positive form of sexual expression. The word is negative; no one should want to be made to feel like shit (even if it does make them cum).


Bluntly, your misery isn't my concern.  It's your own.

I don't want to make you happy.  I did that before with a girl like you.  And it only made things worse.

I don't know how to fix you over a message board.  So this is my experience.  This is what I know.  Good luck working on it.  It's your cross to bear.

You'd only be screwing yourself over me if you started listening to me outside of just a reference, anyhow.  I'm a dominant male- and you're trying to not like guys like me.

(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 5/31/2007 7:47:03 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
Why don't you have a profile up and running?  It would be nice if you put one up with about ten "tit shots."

_____________________________



(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 5/31/2007 9:29:32 PM   
robertolapiedra


Posts: 520
Joined: 5/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

quote:

ORIGINAL: robertolapiedra

Hello again. My "advice" is to stop seeking "ambivalent" stimulation as you "seem" a little bit "obsessive" at this point. You may need counseling also, as it "seems" to me that you are a little "addicted" to your "desires". Maybe, maybe not...better to find out? Yes? RL.



How am I being obsessive? Addicted to my desires? And you and everyone else on this site isn't?



I will speak for myself. I am not obsessive. I am not "fixating" on one thing to the point it makes me unhappy (or all fucked up).

"Everybody else" in this site is exactly the same as in the vanilla world. The majority is not "obsessive" and a few are. It has nothing to do with a lifestyle. It has everything to do with "what you do" in the lifestyle you choose. All sites recieve post from "obsessive" people, this site is no exception.

What-why-how you "do" relates to mental state and mental health (obsession, depression, behavioral disorders, personality disorders and any other neurosis you may find in the "APA" book). Things you "do" that make you "happy",  generally have a "positive" impact on mental health (same as exercise that makes your body strong).

I did not say that you have full blown OCD, I said "you seem a little bit obsessive at this point " (not "obsessed" or implied that you "have clinical"obsession"). I don't do "diagnostics" as it is not my kink.

I find that "if "one want's solid "advice" from people who really care, one should refrain from replying as if one did not want any. That is behavior that does not make for a happy person, and it is not very "inviting" to "solid" advice from people who know their shit. Good luck to you. RL.




(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 5/31/2007 9:38:50 PM   
robertolapiedra


Posts: 520
Joined: 5/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

It's interesting how a post about disrespecting others ends with an insult.



I'm surprised you made it this far without being the subject of more mockery. I was predicting more.


Hello MadRabbit. Unpredictable? RL.

(in reply to MadRabbit)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 2:05:24 AM   
WhiplashSmile


Posts: 1472
Joined: 6/8/2004
Status: offline
Let's take a walk in the park
I'm gonna toss some loose change at the monkey holding the little tin cup, since we're all cranking away and grinding on this thread.
  • "Top and Bottom" is often confused with or equated to "Dominance and Submission".
  • "S&M" is often confused with or equated to "Dominance and Submission".
  • "Humilation/abuse" is part S&M play where mental or physical pain is exchanged.
  • Sex is often confused with or equated to "Dominance and Submission".

BDSM without S&M
You can practice BDSM without all the S&M abuse and pain (mental or physical).  There are some people with wonder Master/slave relationships.  Where the submissive/slave serves as a pleasure slave and never is a S&M plainslut.  S&M is not about sex, it's about giving and recieving pain.   "S&M" is often coupled or equated with "sex" and there are a number of confused people that don't seem to get it.   

S&M without Sex
There are many people that do "S&M" without having sex, and those that do "S&M" sex together.  Trust me you can do "S&M" without sex, I myself have done this.  You can also do "S&M" without D/s even, again I have done this.

BDSM Breaking it Down
My point I'm going to Friggen Make here.. is that too many have D/s coupled with the other aspects or areas of BDSM.  BDSM is a broad label the encompasses the follow areas.
  • Bondage
  • Discipline
  • Dominance and Submission (D/s)
  • S&M 

All you need to be into is just one of the above and you're into BDSM.  You don't have to do it all.  SEX is not a primary area of BDSM.  If you have sex without any of the above listed you are simply having vanilla sex.

D/S Sex without the Rest
Now you can have Sex with D/s without all the other stuff.  Where the Dom/me controls the submissive without "S&M" involved.  Just so happen many people in BDSM enjoy hearing "On your knees now slut, suck my hot nasty cock with that dirty little mouth".   However, "Get down on your knees, I want to feel your mouth around my cock" does the same trick without the vebal humilation.

Natural Body Position.
Yes, it's simply easier for a women to get down on her knees to suck dick.  Regardless if she's submissive or not.  Yes, even Dommes will get down on her knees and say something like "Stand still and take it like a man, you little fucky sissy boy, let me see how long your small pathetic cock lasts in my mouth".   I'm illustrating a point that body position has nothing to do with control or D/s whatsoever.   Now remove the S&M from this and a Domme might say "Stand still, I want to see how long you last in my mouth".  No humilation involved.   What the OP failed to mention is that men can lay down with the women above them for sucking cock.  Same can be said for intercourse.  Hell people can lay side by side.. and there are all kinds of positions upside and down side.  Sexual top and bottom.  

Dom/mes taking the Bottom
Some Dom personalities simply feel more comfortable assuming the top position.  I'm going to express my opinion (my view), I believe many (not all) Dom/mes that consistently take only the top position during sex are not trusting/accepting/confident in the level of submission from their partner".  They do this to physically reinforce thier Dominance using body language.  I suspect, in part, this is to make up for lack of verbal control and reinforcement.  Also, it's my opinion that that Dommes are generally (not always) better at verbal control compared to most (not all) male Doms.  I'm certain I've opened up a can of worms for debate now. 

Verbal/Mental Vs. Physical Contol
A Dom/me can actually Top from the bottom using verbal skills.   Physically the Dom/me may be on the bottom, however in terms of D/s they are on the Top mentally and verbally. This also applies to S&M play.  I think (it's my belief) many Dom/mes who lack verbal/mental control over a submissive would sooner piss themselves before being the bottom during Sex or S&M play.  Amazing for the number of Dom/me profiles professing the great mental control skills they have mastered.  I tend to believe (think) that the Dommes are better at mental control compared to male Doms.  Perhaps some of the bisexual sub/slaves reading this would care to comment on this one. ;-/  or not.  Back to this can of worms again.  However, I'm being bold in my thoughts here.

I have been on the bottom of S&M play while maintaining the TOP or the "D" in the "D/s".  
This is why I do not consider myself as a Switch.   Perhaps in some people's eyes I'm a switch, however if I'm treated like a submissive/slave that is in for 100% Grade A Smart Ass Dom that does not tolerate it.   Somebody trying to Dom my ass is a hard limit.   

D/s and Natural Body Language vs. Natural Sex Position
Many people simply take advantage of "body positioning" for D/s.  This is an aspect that is a natural human condition.  People who are surrending in a fight will assume these very same positions.   Hands on back of head, drop to knees. That they are not going to Fight or take Flight.   Fight or Flight is a common basic concept.  When somebody is dropped to thier knees with hands behind thier head, it is body Language at it's best.   It's Natural Body Language for D/s.  

The Give or Take word ploy..
I find this funny... "our bodies are shaped so that women take cock and men give cock.".  The words "take" and "give" here.  In a sense this infers that Woman Take and Men Give, where the woman is in control.  Reminds me of "Pussy Power" to the max.  LOL... however this can be the subject of endless go nowhere debate.

It's amazing the number of female sub/slaves that have "I want a Man that will take what he wants."

I wonder how many prospective Doms phrase things in the context of pussy power to discover they are getting nowhere fast?  Something to think about.   I actually believe in "Pussy Power" and "Cock Power" both for sort of balanced view.  The whole premise behind D/s is for one to take control of this power from the other.  

Downfall of Dom/mes
Using ones sex as a weapon can be a bad thing.  D/s or M/s relationships should remove sex from being a weapon of the submissive.  Another reason to seperate sex out of the BDSM equation at times.   How Dom is a pussy whipped Dom after all?  How Dom is a cock whipped Domme?   Basically it's when Dom/me start thinking with the wrong body parts and not with the brain in their heads.  What good is Discipline when one does not have Self-Discipline over their own horny flesh.  Yes, submissive/slaves will test sexual power and control... this can lead to the end of the D/s dynamics.  I'm certain there are many that could comment upon this one! 

Real Power and Control Hogwash
I really think the OP was out to lunch about Real Power and Control regarding Raping somebody for real.  Raping somebody is only partial power/control over somebody.  Rapist are not using self control or discipline.  If one is not in control of themselves they can not maintain control over anybody else.  Rapist end up loosing more control over thier lives by being sent to jail.  Back in the days of the wild west they were Hung by Lynch mobs.  Humans have a natural tendancy to kill off or punish psychopaths severly.  If this was not the case the world would be ruled and controled by nothing by psychopaths. This is all part of Mother Natures Design.


Well folks this is all I have to share in terms of my thoughts, views and opinions on this thread.

< Message edited by WhiplashSmile -- 6/1/2007 2:10:40 AM >

(in reply to spanklette)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 5:42:38 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
I think it's a little obsessive that the entire CM community is choosing to drag this topic out and me thru the mud. What's up with that? Read the subject again. I was asking specifically about body positioning and wondering what others thought about the nature of submission and the fact that lots of our sexual positions are submissive in nature. I re-read my OP and realized I included way too much EXTRA info, because that is mainly what everyone is writing about now. So what? So I wrote a snarky email. The one time I decide to come onto the forum and this is what I get? An analysis of my state of happiness and wellbeing?

And, RL, I was SERIOUSLY asking what u meant in your post. I wasn't being defensive, but I've obviously been PIGEONHOLED now, cuz ppl are writing as if I'm challenging the whole community on here.

(in reply to robertolapiedra)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 5:46:20 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Bluntly, your misery isn't my concern.  It's your own.

I don't want to make you happy.  I did that before with a girl like you.  And it only made things worse.


You misunderstood my reason for crying--It was because I totally related to that girl you knew and shared her pain for a moment, which made me emotional. YOU didn't do anything so I wasn't trying to blame you for making me upset. There was no need to be so cold about it!

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 5:53:28 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

It's interesting how a post about disrespecting others ends with an insult.



I'm surprised you made it this far without being the subject of more mockery. I was predicting more.


So sorry to dissapoint you . . . No one wants to know or hear about unhappiness or depression until it becomes entertainment, right? Our problems are more interesting than our successes.

(in reply to MadRabbit)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:06:02 AM   
earthycouple


Posts: 4462
Joined: 2/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

I don't see how your "subcommunity" and the other community differ. Giving consent is giving consent, whether ones knows what lines they should say or not. Are u telling me that u go around raping and abusing ppl? I think not. So what if u told ur sub what to expect? She still gave her consent for u to "do what u please." It's ALL submission; I don't agree with the line you want to draw.


Some of us draw a line at doing what we believe our subs want, just we say it, for the superficial quality of verbally making the command.
Others of us do as we want- without yielding to the will of our sub, just accepting her willingness to serve in any way.
In the end, though, you are correct- a rapist is the most dominant.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

I wish I could walk away, but I can't. I crave abuse and humiliation more than food.


I knew a girl like you when I was younger.  I took on a mentor position over her- she masturbated to me every night on the phone until a year or two later when I got it.  I knew her family well enough, though.. she wasn't abused.  I don't know why she was like that.

Later, when playing with her, I found the idea of me punching her practically made her cum alone.  She wanted the humilation and pain more than anything- and she utterly hated it.  For a long time, we satisfied eachother, trying to keep it at that.  But she grew to be happy with that arrangement- and she didn't like happy- so she tore it to shreds and made herself miserable again.

In the end, it didn't work out well for her.  She was still ill, and very miserable.  I suppose that's what she wanted.

I am sorry, but, should your condition be similar, I do not know how to help you outside of actually tying you up in a basement and making you enjoy it- and I'm not sure if that's even a good idea, as it may just be a very bad one.

I agree with LafayetteLady to the idea of getting a therapist.  I just don't know if it'll actually do the trick.  But, best of wishes.


Huh What?  Because someone can physically overpower another in a fit of rage and terror he's dominant?  I see rapists as psychopaths and sexual deviants (and not in the *S* good way)

_____________________________

D~

Seeking, searching, hoping, living, loving, jumping. So what's new with you?

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:08:21 AM   
Aileen68


Posts: 6091
Joined: 8/2/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

I think it's a little obsessive that the entire CM community is choosing to drag this topic out and me thru the mud. What's up with that? Read the subject again. I was asking specifically about body positioning and wondering what others thought about the nature of submission and the fact that lots of our sexual positions are submissive in nature. I re-read my OP and realized I included way too much EXTRA info, because that is mainly what everyone is writing about now. So what? So I wrote a snarky email. The one time I decide to come onto the forum and this is what I get? An analysis of my state of happiness and wellbeing?



I'll ignore the highjack except to say that if you put out info expect for people to comment on it. 

As to your idea that sex positions lead to submissive tendencies...I completely disagree.  I can be on top and still be submissive.  It's more of a mindset than a physical thing.  Based on your assumption, every woman would be submissive and they're not.  There are many many dominant women that I'm sure have sex in missionary and "submissive" positions.

(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:08:44 AM   
DomMeinCT


Posts: 2355
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

I think it's a little obsessive that the entire CM community is choosing to drag this topic out and me thru the mud.


In all fairness, you can hardly act the victim when by my count you're responsible for posting a third of all the comments in this thread which have kept it alive.

(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:17:58 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
When did I ever say I was a victim? I don't feel that way.

Maybe I've written most of the posts because I'm responding to the comments made about me. Then I find ppl commenting on THOSE COMMENTS. LOL I mean, c'mon, this can go on forever, no?

(in reply to DomMeinCT)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:26:48 AM   
MrDiscipline44


Posts: 1776
Joined: 1/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomMeinCT
In all fairness, you can hardly act the victim when by my count you're responsible for posting a third of all the comments in this thread which have kept it alive.
I think she's just trying to get her posting number up. Though I do see her responses as attention whoreish.  Maybe someone should toss her a collar of protection so all the meanies here would leave her alone. hahahaha

< Message edited by MrDiscipline44 -- 6/1/2007 6:32:22 AM >


_____________________________

If you love somebody, you have to be willing to break them.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

Have you slapped your slave today?

(in reply to DomMeinCT)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:36:47 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
Listen, I'm going to defend myself. Period. And if all I wanted was attention then I would've responded to ALL the posts, which I didn't.

You're funny, tho. You just egged me on further with the "attention whoreish" comment. Now what the hell is that suppossed to mean? (I probably would've ignored it had the word "whoreish" not been there.)

(in reply to MrDiscipline44)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 6:46:30 AM   
Aileen68


Posts: 6091
Joined: 8/2/2005
Status: offline
It's funny because you have been the one to lead this thread in the direction it's taken.  You OP actually has two different things going on in it.  You seem to want to discuss sexual positions and submissiveness and you seem to want feedback on a rather rude email that you sent to a wanker.  When someone (Curiouslord) responded to the whole submissiveness/humiliation aspect of your op you cut him down based on his age.  And now you wonder why you're getting the responses that you are.  I also responded to your one aspect of humiliation/submissiveness and yet you chose to not even acknowledge that, same as you have skipped right over other serious responses.
So yeah...now my vote goes to you being an attention whore.
Drama drama drama

edited because I can't type correctly with only one cup of coffee in my bloodstream.

< Message edited by Aileen68 -- 6/1/2007 6:47:52 AM >

(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 7:02:33 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
K, this whore word is really pissing me off. I think it's obnoxious!

Now you're analyzing the time it takes me to respond to posts? So I responded to the negative ones first? So what? Doesn't mean I wasn't going to respond to yours. Is there a time limit? Couldn't you come back tomorrow and check? Your definition of "serious" could also differ from mine. What is this? Communist BDSM? lol Most of this shit's subjective.

I never wanted feedback on the email I sent. I only used it as an example of what I was trying to say with submission and body positions. I realize now that it was a VERY POOR EXAMPLE. Yes, I cut the boy down. I was ageist and apologized for that.

Anyway, yes it is a mindset. I wasn't really thinking about the mind's role, more about the physical positioning without any mental aspects. It does have a place in the argument, tho.

(in reply to Aileen68)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 7:09:28 AM   
dawntreader


Posts: 3045
Joined: 11/23/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

I never wanted feedback on the email I sent. I only used it as an example of what I was trying to say with submission and body positions. I realize now that it was a VERY POOR EXAMPLE..
quote:

This is a message I sent to someone in response to his. I wanted to post it to open discussion and get opinions/feedback on what I wrote.
This is a direct quote from your OP~ (just keeping you honest and on track)


Yes, I cut the boy down. I was ageist and apologized for that.  Yes, you did and some of us appreciated this~



edited for screwing up the quote box thing~

< Message edited by dawntreader -- 6/1/2007 7:14:01 AM >


_____________________________

It is choice - not chance - that determines our destiny~
Jean Nidetch

There is a war going on for your mind...if you are thinking, you are winning~
Flobots

(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 7:11:53 AM   
Aileen68


Posts: 6091
Joined: 8/2/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoyLover

This is a message I sent to someone in response to his. I wanted to post it to open discussion and get opinions/feedback on what I wrote.
Start of message:
Thanks for your "canned" message--one that u send to all the girls? We've been in contact before. It's so great how the subs on here are so important to u that u take the time to remember the ones who rejected you (yes, read that with sarcasm). Are u a switch or what? Your profile is all about your cock penetrations into your slut's holes. No, I don't want to explore all the sick, twisted fantasies in my head--I don't think I should learn to accept the need to be humiliated and used and abused by men. I want to deny that part of myself as long as I can, and continue to get off on it in private, with porn. Why should anybody accept that she's a pathetic cunt who's playing into the age-old stereotypes about womens' "place"? You know, our bodies are shaped so that women "take" cock and men "give" cock. That's just how mother nature designed it. It's strange to me that ppl in BDSM use that "body positioning" as a form of humiliation or subservience. Listen, guy, it's easier for me to suck your cock while on my knees; doesn't mean I'm "below" you! Lying on my back or stomach or doggy position is a way for me to "get off" cuz it hits my clit best, or I can play with my clit; not so u can feel like some dominant animal "taking control". You want real control and power? Go rape someone! That's where this shit lies; in the real life part of it. Ppl try to capture that with consent games. Pretend all u want---it'll never be as good as the real thing, which only psychopaths will truly pursue.


This was your own words...obviously I wasn't the only one to interpret it as you wanting feedback on the tone of your email.  The internet leads for tons of room for misinterpretation.  I'm also not the only one to think that your words to all of us here are edged with sarcasm and a bit of anger. 

quote:

Now you're analyzing the time it takes me to respond to posts? So I responded to the negative ones first? So what? Doesn't mean I wasn't going to respond to yours. Is there a time limit? Couldn't you come back tomorrow and check? Your definition of "serious" could also differ from mine. What is this? Communist BDSM? lol Most of this shit's subjective. 
 


I, personally, could care less what you respond to.  I find it rather amusing to watch you make such a positive impression.  You're the one that came with a question and yet you can't seem to let the off topic things go.  Good luck.  You're gonna need it.

(in reply to BoyLover)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 7:16:05 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
I know it sounds contradictory. I realize that I should of just opened discussion about my topic without including the email. I only wanted comment on a certain thing I brought up in the email; not on the tone or fact that I sent the email in the first place. 

(in reply to dawntreader)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? - 6/1/2007 7:22:25 AM   
BoyLover


Posts: 37
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen68

I, personally, could care less what you respond to.  I find it rather amusing to watch you make such a positive impression.  You're the one that came with a question and yet you can't seem to let the off topic things go.  Good luck.  You're gonna need it.


Yeah, you could care less---that's why you brought it up! You just said it right there---OFF-TOPIC: meaning not relevant. I'm gonna need "luck"? LOL What is this? A job interview? Give me a break...

(in reply to Aileen68)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Semantics or Mother Nature's Design? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109