CuriousLord
Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord I wouldn't say that classifying someone as a "Professional" changes it one bit. Just adds in a sterotype. My point was, escentially, that people can believe in something, and support it, without wanting to have to take the brunt of it. That one doesn't have to not support something in sentiment to not be actively fully involved. Sort of like how many religious people aren't Priests. Most aren't, actually. That whole vow-of-celeabacy gets them. Anyhow, my point is against this argument- that people who support the war but don't enlist are pussies. So, they're all in favor of sending other people to die, but not take that risk themselves. COWARDS. I suppose the difference is that Firefighters aren't explicitly hired to kill, and be killed, however the troops are. When you deploy troops, you are sending them to DIE and KILL. To believe otherwise is to live in denial of the realities. And in that context your analogy breaks down. How so? Did you think firefighting was a cushy, safe job? And, hell. There are some breaks in the analogy. Firefighters get to stay home. They get to do something universally respected (expect, perhaps, by true pyro-ethuasts). They get to drive around a cool truck and still get that sexy uniform. And cities are -still- short on firefighters. Don't take the analogy too far. I'm not saying firefighting and soldiering are the same- you're looking at it too plainly. Analogies bring up points of comparison, but break beyond that point. This does not necessarily mean the point of comparison is invalid, it just means the analogy is outside of its limits. So consider this point, and not trying to make the two professions entirely equilevalent. People can believe in things. Want things done. And still not put their lives on hold to do them. Most have other interests. And, while you might insult one for not going to war, despite supporting it- can you not say the same of one not wanting to go to fight fires, despite supporting such a thing? Or being an EMT, despite supporting an emergency health system of some form? Or being an adoption agent, despise supporting orphans finding loving homes? What about those who enjoy technology, supporting the notion of further research, yet fail to put on a lab coat? Are all these people- the utterly vast majority of the population- cowards? To this end, I propose that such an oversimplication was a vulgar attempt at an insult. I can only summise it was out of politically-influenced malice towards the target population.
|