SusanofO
Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005 Status: offline
|
I draw a distiction between people who want to be genuine friends with the person they are "subbing" or Domming" to, and people who want or seem to need a more "impersonal" D/s encounter or relationship. I don't see anything wrong, really with either one - but I know I've observed people who seem to have a very impersonal (or at least less than what I'd consider "mostly "warm") general way of relating to their subs (and even their Dom/Dommes). It doesn't "work" for me, but I guess some people do it that way. But I do think there is a built in presumption for some people, that everyone in a D/s relationship is in a life-long (or hoped to be life-long) kind of romantic situation, even to the exclusion of what I consider to be real D/s (not that "real" D/s isn't "romantic" - but - there are probably going to be one or two things a submissive might have to end up doing, that they plain just don't appreciate, or think are necessary, or want to do.) Hmmm - it even sounds like "Vanilla" life and D/s really have more in common than appears at first glance - in that regard, anyway, hehe. Couple this belief with the expectation some seem to have, that that a Dom/me is going to remove all of the "hard parts" (as far as taking responsibility for - whatever) in a submissive's life - and it can be setting oneself up for trouble. From what I've read, built in life-long "romance", and removal of thinking about having to take personal responsibility for even sometimes more "major" life decisions - isn't always removed for a submssive, just because someone is a submissive - and beacuse they now have a Dom/me. From what I've read, this scenario is definitely not always the case. *Because, IMO, A submissive still is going to have to live with their decisions - even if they truly believe their only "decision" is to hand over decision-making responsibility for "everything" to someone else. Sometimes, the BDSM actvity is exclusively in the "bedroom". For others, it's D/s interaction all the time, etc. I guess expectations do depend though, on the two involved (and everyone's relationship is different, of course). I do agree with LA, that people should examine their expectations of a D/s relationship. Most Dom/mes I've read about whom I consider responsible advocate doing this, even before a relationship starts; it's sort of something I consider part of the entire "get to know you" process" - but there are still people who are secretly hoping for things that might never happen, I guess (this isn't that uncommon in "Vanilla" life either, IMO). *Btw - I think in a D/s relationship, expecting auto-"romance", to the major exclusion of real D/s (and an expectation of obedience as the primary operative expectation) can probably also seem "impersonal" - to the partner who is expecting more real D/s, and less "fluffy romance" (that might not make sense to some, but it does to me). So it's probably not just the submissive who is "disappointed" in these case where "romance" OR real D/s interaction (based on a presumption of a submissive's obedience) one to the exclusion of the other - seems to be the expectation. But in any case - if there's a problem, then I say talk it over with your partner. In a less "personal" or "warm" D/s relationship, I can see how interactions between Dom/me and sub might truly work as just a general part of their established "dynamic", and their expectaitons of eachother might be very rigidly defined, with a lot less talking it over or need felt for "discussion" about the relationship (ever, expect maybe one time, orsomething). *But I think expecting D/s to be automatically more about "romance" than its about, well, D/s -is probably setting oneself up for disappointment. Personally, I prefer to mix the two together, and it sort of seems to happen naturally. *Bottom line - It's still about two people establishing a relationship ("impersonal" or "warm and fuzzy") - and that takes time. Unless we are referring to simple, one time encounters or "scening" with someone once, or something, IMO (and even then, except for one time I can remember, personally I always prefer to really know (and like) the person I am "scening" with). Like I said before, completely impersonal wouldn't ever work for me, but I can see it, if that's what some people want, then... - Susan
< Message edited by SusanofO -- 7/31/2007 1:46:14 PM >
_____________________________
"Hope is the thing with feathers, That perches in the soul, And sings the tune without the words, And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson
|