Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all????


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/10/2005 10:40:35 AM   
plantlady64


Posts: 755
Joined: 5/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Ok..I've read all the responses to this opener. Actually i'm really sitting here wondering why so many posts evolved as elaborate as they did. Why?..because of this one tiny little phrase "Am I wrong"?

My thought to that is why are you coming onto a forum board asking complete strangers if your behavior is wrong or right when you have a Master.

My response: Ask your Master

Hello Sir,
I was not under a Master when I ask this.
Thanks for your advice though.
Sincerely,
sub suzanne

(in reply to starshineowned)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/10/2005 12:56:52 PM   
RainGod


Posts: 230
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Hendersonville, NC
Status: offline
quote:

Why do large percentages of Dom's feel a sub must be subserviant to them if I'm not their sub?


That's an odd thing to Me... I wonder that Myself. To see a Dom be so self-assuming lends to the thought they have no expereince, no self esteem and no manners. That's just My opinion though.

quote:

Is there some unwritten law that says if you choose to be a sub, you are to expect to be controlled by anyone who claims to be a Dom?


God, I hope not. Think of the damage that would be caused to subs if a buncha wannabes found out they HAD TO obey Them... lol. I like the law of "girl chooses Whom she will serve and obey...as well as respect."

quote:

In social parties, or even the Dungeon I go to I don't feel it should be necessary to be submissive to all Dom's. I don't understand why I must be in my role to people I don't respect, like or ever intend to submit to or play with. I don't show respect unless I feel their actions warrant that respect. Mind you I'm not mouthy or rude, I'm just not following their directions of me.


In My house you do NOT have to obey, play with, serve, render respect beyond t hat of common courtesy, and especially not be used by anyone whom she has not chosen to submit to. I do not assume a girl ought to do so with Me... I do not ask it. To Me, it is rude and not very gentlemanly to demand a gift of someone. When it is demanded it is not a gift, but required tribute. Submission and respect is a sweet gift. (yes I know not everyone believes it is, but I do.)

As for titles, I feel uncomfortable being called "Master" by someone with whom I do not share a very deep relationship, or one who is not collared to Me. I understand some subs are automatically respectful, and that's fine, but I would never take advatage of that or let it go to My head. "Sir" is very nice to hear, but I would never dream of demanding it of someone who isn't Mine.

As I said, thats just the way it is in My house... and I am aware not everyone feels that way.



_____________________________

Love is a razor & I walk the line on that silver blade... slept in the dust with His daughter her eyes red with the slaughter of innocence... The evil that men do lives on & on.
~ Iron Maiden

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/11/2005 9:51:17 AM   
fwnick


Posts: 8
Joined: 7/16/2005
Status: offline
You are right your respect is earned not given.
be submissive to all that YOU feel deserve it.
Macho I'm the boss guys are really not DOMs if they push you around.

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/12/2005 9:36:50 AM   
pinkpleasures


Posts: 1114
Status: offline
quote:

This just happens to be one of my pet peeves. I may be a dominant male but I am also a gentleman. I believe that you treat a woman with respect in any situation, especially if they are your submissive. Those that want to flex their Domly muscles and prove to everyone that they are dominant by treating potential sub's like shit will be alone for quite a while. Just from reading these forums, I have seen countless posts about Dom's writing an opening email demanding submission from someone that they don't even know. If you cannot bother to introduce yourself and nurture a friendship first before attempting a Dom/sub relationship then you miss the point about a relationship at all. I have said this once, I will say it again, have some dominants forgotten about romance? I guess I am from an old school of thought, but I thought the point of searching for a mate involved romance and love.

Gauge


Applauds what Gauge said.

pinkpleasures


_____________________________



(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 6:07:48 AM   
Padriag


Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: plantlady64

Hello There,
There really was nothing before this gesture of his. I'd seen him at a social and we'd discussed getting to know each other better. I went to a dungeon with one of my male friends. We were talking about the rules of the dungeon we were in and he grabbed my chin and told me I could not talk unless he ask me to.


Hi Suzanne,

Yup, sounds like someone was just being an ass, trying to show off. He might have been inexperienced or just insecure, when a dom isn't secure in their own dominance (ie. still unsure of it) they tend to try an show off and be "Domly Dom" as overcompensation. It was rude of him to do that and something to have made the DMs aware of. Not really a major problem, but an annoyance. The only time I could see that as being acceptable was if your talking was interrupting a scene he was doing, that's about it. But as you were new and asking what the rules were, his response was uncalled for. I like the way your Master handled it though

Random observation here, but one of the things I see happen with doms is confusing being hard with being rude or an asshole. A dom should be hard in the sense they should have a high degree of self discipline, and the ability to apply discipline without letting their emotions get in the way. But what I often see happen with many doms is that they thing to be hard they can have no emotions or only very limited emotions, which is not true. I have heard many say they cannot love their subs/slaves because that would prevent them from being a dom, nonsense. What that tells me is the dom has a problem with managing their own emotions, especially love. Loving a slave and still being firm and strict in discipline and expectations is not a contradiction, but I guess some just don't get that. Personally, I think a dominant should have a big heart, and just as they are strong in their discipline and other parts of their life, they ought to be strong in their emotions and passions. There is freedom in that.

One other comment, we talk a lot about how doms should treat subs and slaves with respect, and I agree with that. But that goes both ways, a sub or slave should treat doms with respect. Respect isn't blind obesience, its just respect, basic courtesy. Then again, SAMs don't do so well with me... can't imagine why.

_____________________________

Padriag

A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 2:05:54 PM   
ImpGrrl


Posts: 575
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wolfspirits

There Is Nothing Wrong With Using Common Courtesy And General Politness To All. By Doing This Is In No Way Betraying Your Loyalness To The One You Belong. Yes Everyone Knows You Obey Your Owner When Told To Servce Or Submit. ie, In A Crowd You Bump Into A Dom/Domme A Simple Pardon Me Sir, Or Ma'am Would Be Polite. ... Or Being Introduced To A Dom/Domme A Simple "Please To Meet You Sir, Ma'am Etc. Would Be Polite . These Are Just Titles . To Be Ordered Around And Serve Others With Out Your Owners Consent Is wrong. To Be Polite Is Not wrong, Remeber That How You Carry Yourself Is A Relection On Your Owner.
Lady Silver,Of WolfSpirits.



It would only be "common courtesy" if you treated s-types the *exact* *same* way. If you treat them differently - then it's a differentiation by role. Which I don't believe is appropriate, unless I have agreements with that person or someone I'm obligated to.

(in reply to wolfspirits)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 2:13:04 PM   
ImpGrrl


Posts: 575
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

You describe yourself as a submissive, but then here you state "I don't understand why I must be in my role to people I don't respect" which raises the question, are you or are you not a submissive? I ask this because here too we are dealing with expectations. Being submissive is part of your nature, not a role... either you are or you aren't, but you don't flip it on an off like a light switch. Being submissive has nothing to do with whom you respect or don't respect, either you have a submissive nature or you don't. On the other hand a bottom does, precisely because what they do is a role they assume. Which do you think better describes you?


As an s-type to my Sir, I want to respond to this.

I am submissive in my relational role to him. That does *not* apply to the world-at-large, unless he says otherwise. It's between me and him - or me and anyone else with whom I have that chemistry.

And that's it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

To me, it means nothing more than a general submissive nature shown in your behavior, your personality. It does not, to me at least, mean any dominant can order you to play with them or serve them in anything more than a very general way (such as asking you to get them a drink or would you check an see if they're about to start serving the food, etc.), nor does it give them any liberty to touch you in anything other than an normal way (ie, no grabbing your ass, etc.). If we were at an event and I asked you to do some simple task (and assuming you weren't already doing something), I would expect you to do it... period. If you refused that would make me aware of something about you, I would make a mental note of it, and act accordingly in the future (in short I wouldn't waste my time asking you to do anything else again). On the other hand I would not expect you to engage in play, sexual service, etc. just because I'm dominant and you're submissive, that goes beyond reason and into the realm of personal relationships. Since no such relationship exists its absolutely unrealistic to expect the kinds of service that normally are part of such relationships.



I believe that the expectations you have of those who desire to be an s-type in a relationship are as absolutely unrealistic as those you describe at the end. D-types are no more entitled to the smaller kinds of service by s-types not in relationship with them than they are to the larger types of service and entitlements.


< Message edited by ImpGrrl -- 10/13/2005 2:17:17 PM >

(in reply to Padriag)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 2:21:06 PM   
ImpGrrl


Posts: 575
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: plantlady64
This question was presented to the group after a Dom I'd just met at a social grabbed me by my chin and started barking orders at me the next time I saw him. I do agree that I should behave in a submissively respectful way as it is in my nature to behave that way most of the time.


I won't argue with how you feel you should act.

However, I believe anyone in this situation has every right to be indignant and angry with the person who treats them in this manner - unless there is a previous agreement with this person.

Certainly, one can be angry/indignant and civil - but "civil" is the best they deserve.

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 4:35:18 PM   
anopheles


Posts: 241
Joined: 6/23/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Random observation here, but one of the things I see happen with doms is confusing being hard with being rude or an asshole. A dom should be hard in the sense they should have a high degree of self discipline, and the ability to apply discipline without letting their emotions get in the way. But what I often see happen with many doms is that they thing to be hard they can have no emotions or only very limited emotions, which is not true. I have heard many say they cannot love their subs/slaves because that would prevent them from being a dom, nonsense. What that tells me is the dom has a problem with managing their own emotions, especially love. Loving a slave and still being firm and strict in discipline and expectations is not a contradiction, but I guess some just don't get that. Personally, I think a dominant should have a big heart, and just as they are strong in their discipline and other parts of their life, they ought to be strong in their emotions and passions.


Yes. I don't know how you can't love your slave/submissive, because they are giving so much to you to begin with. They give up everything for your adoration, how can you not give it back?

_____________________________

You've got me so high, my shoes are scraping the sky -- for my Luvdragon

(in reply to ImpGrrl)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 4:53:02 PM   
fastlane


Posts: 2159
Joined: 5/26/2005
Status: offline
Hello Suzanne

Wow, your thread did recieve a lot of attention, kinda like you....smart, sexy, submissive and yearning to learn. Who would not pay attention to you?
Still, a Dom should always be respectful.....always.....Number one Rule!
Secondly, I don't think you have to ever worry about that again....Master Rick is one Big Dood!

Wicked Kev...LOL.....chili paste on your adversary here......that is a wicked recipe and I can't wait to use it on someone.......Fastlane lets out a sinister laugh!

< Message edited by fastlane -- 10/13/2005 4:54:47 PM >


_____________________________

Just because it hurts, doesn't necessarily make it a bad thing.

(in reply to anopheles)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/13/2005 5:28:32 PM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
hello again plantlady,

good to see your progression is going well except for the minor speed bumbs like this one.

Scrolling down the replies, you have received plenty of thought.

For my mind, I think WolfSpirit' submissive has said it best.

CP

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/15/2005 11:32:11 PM   
Wolfie648


Posts: 600
Joined: 9/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I'm hopeful you can help me with a question that's been very frustrating for me so far.
Why do large percentages of Dom's feel a sub must be subserviant to them if I'm not their sub? Is there some unwritten law that says if you choose to be a sub, you are to expect to be controlled by anyone who claims to be a Dom?


I have no idea why but you do not (my opinion) need to be sub to anyone but your master unless your master otherwise tells you so and that your master has that right according to your agreement.

Just like I do not have the right to tell you to do anything - unless you are my sub.

D (owner of j)

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 1:01:57 AM   
Wolfie648


Posts: 600
Joined: 9/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Firstly, define your idea of "ownership" -- if we use mine, it does not necessary equate to a physical taking of a body. I am owned, though I have not set eyes on the man who owns me for nearly a year now. We were together for two years and I was released due to something I prefer not to go into to. He and I still talk almost every day and, with luck, in the near future I will get to see him again. The fact that I no longer wear his collar does not change the fact that he owns me. Why? Because I trust him with my life, want to please him above and beyond reasoning and will obey unconditionally. That, to me, is being owned.

Syn


Not that you need my approval, seek it or even give the smallest amount of credence to it but wow I read that, really liked it, and I seriously like your dedication. Good for you.

D (owner of j)


(in reply to Synocense)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 1:20:59 AM   
Wolfie648


Posts: 600
Joined: 9/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Being my Master is 6'3 and this guy is 5'8 he didn't argue.


Not to defend the guy at all (as I hope you can tell by my previous posts) but height has nothing to do with the ability to defend oneself. I am 5' 8" and had an ex-girlfriend (waaaay back when I used those terms) who was 5' 2" (weighed a lot less than me) and took Aikido. I had taken Karate (Shotokan) for 1.5 yrs at this point and she had taken Aikido. I had taken a tour of europe and she invited me over - it was by far the most pleasant experience we had had since seperating and as one of the exchanges we had that night, we sparred. Neither of us was out to hurt the other but I was - Impressed - at the effectiveness of Aikido. Especially considering she had only been taking it for 2 months.

I think everyone understands that my point is that just because one has more mass or height, does not mean that you will intimidate someone whether the situation calls for it or not, whether the other person understands it or not.

I do love surprises :-)

By no means am I defending this other person as facts have been presented. I suggest caution (sadly that is it needed means we need to move to the next step as humans but the truth is the truth).

D (owner of J)


(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 10:43:56 AM   
PeJay


Posts: 11
Joined: 7/18/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: plantlady64

Hello Sir's,
I'm hopeful you can help me with a question that's been very frustrating for me so far.
Why do large percentages of Dom's feel a sub must be subserviant to them if I'm not their sub? Is there some unwritten law that says if you choose to be a sub, you are to expect to be controlled by anyone who claims to be a Dom? In social parties, or even the Dungeon I go to I don't feel it should be necessary to be submissive to all Dom's. I don't understand why I must be in my role to people I don't respect, like or ever intend to submit to or play with. I don't show respect unless I feel their actions warrant that respect. Mind you I'm not mouthy or rude, I'm just not following their directions of me.
Am I wrong?
Sincerely questioning my Position as it pertains to the world at large, and not my friends,
sub suzanne


Of course not but as a matter of etiquette, most Dom/mes WILL expect to be addressed as Sir or Madam or4 in some cases Master or Mistress But this is usually in the form of, Master Pejay, as that is my name. But the only person who demands and should expect to get your unquestioning obedience and trust is YOU'RE Master or Mistress!

(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 12:17:47 PM   
ImpGrrl


Posts: 575
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeJay
Of course not but as a matter of etiquette, most Dom/mes WILL expect to be addressed as Sir or Madam or4 in some cases Master or Mistress


As a matter of etiquette *in specifically indicated situations*, that may be true. At meetings of "formal" groups, etc, perhaps. In general BDSM "society - no.

quote:

But this is usually in the form of, Master Pejay, as that is my name.


One's name is not "Master" anything. "Master" is the title, "Pejay" is the name. So, if introduced to you as "Master Pejay", it would be quite proper and polite (and proper etiquette, even!) to return with "Nice to meet you, Pejay!"

quote:

But the only person who demands and should expect to get your unquestioning obedience and trust is YOU'RE Master or Mistress!


On this we agree.



(in reply to PeJay)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 12:56:38 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeJay
Of course not but as a matter of etiquette, most Dom/mes WILL expect to be addressed as Sir or Madam or4 in some cases Master or Mistress


Not in the circles were I normally travel. In fact, outside of a few "high protocol" groups, claiming a title like "Master" is the occasion for a bit of quiet snickering on the part of both doms and subs.

There is an old martial arts saying that gets repeated a lot "When someone tells you he is a "master" you can bet he isn't."

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to PeJay)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 3:24:49 PM   
TheChastiser


Posts: 95
Joined: 10/16/2005
From: Hemel Hempstead
Status: offline
imo, a posession is just that. not some object to be shared with all and sundry. to that end, although i expect someone of mine to be respectful and exibit good manners to others, by no means do i expect them to sub to others. there is no need to call others sir, maam or your majesty. i generally dont treat my posessions like library books.

putting it simply, no one else rides my bike or drives my car, why should i let someone else dominate my slave?

Mike


_____________________________



Let Me unchain your mind and your sexuality will follow.


(in reply to plantlady64)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 3:27:11 PM   
TheChastiser


Posts: 95
Joined: 10/16/2005
From: Hemel Hempstead
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren
There is an old martial arts saying that gets repeated a lot "When someone tells you he is a "master" you can bet he isn't."


indeed. those with such skills also carry with them modesty and humility. for they have no need to tell others of their skills, their deeds portray this on their own.

Mike





_____________________________



Let Me unchain your mind and your sexuality will follow.


(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? - 10/16/2005 8:42:47 PM   
DsKittyKat


Posts: 1
Joined: 10/12/2005
Status: offline
I call others "Sir" out of respect for "our kind". Also, how you act , how you look, and in all you do reflects how your Master has trained you. Trained badly... it reflects on your Master... which I do not nor ever wish to make a bad name for my Master. There will be times one treats me in a way I feel uncomfortable... then is when I lower my head and Master will speak for me... later I will explain why I did not greet this one person.

(in reply to siamsa24)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Sub = Obedient sheep to all???? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094