MaamJay
Posts: 2101
Joined: 9/2/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: fungasm Another way to look at things: two people in the late 1970s/Early 1980s get married- either in college or just after. They are in love, and they think that their partner will fit into the life they imagine at 22. They begin a family and they begin careers. They have rough times and good times. Twenty-five years pass. The house is almost paid for. They are closing in on retirement. The UMs are out of the house or old enough so the parents are simply the wallets on the periphery. Then one partner "suddenly decides" they want something more. Now everyone here knows it's not sudden, it was years of thoughts/desires/cravings. Perhap they were 30 when the cravings started... so it's been 17-20 years that they have imagined submission or domination as a part of their life. One partner wants an experience (and one which is inheirently sexual) that is considered inappropriate by most societal standards. (Bondage? Sodomy? Play that has the word torture in it? CBT/NT...) So this person hints at it with their partner, possibly mentioning the most gentle of acts: "how about a blindfold during sex this week honey?" Then they are chastized, and possibly not get any that week. Or the next. Their partner is emotionally invested in their status quo, and feel genuinely hurt by the need for something more. Why aren't they enough anymore? Is it because they are growing older? You can see the partner's point of view. They married someone under a certain scenarion. They held up their end of the bargain. For 25 years they lived the life they agreed to. They think it's not fair that things change now. And our egos as we approach 50 can be fragile things. So now one partner has things they want, things they didn't even know they wanted before they got married, things which aren't possible with their partner. Now they don't want to leave their partner. They really don't want to hurt their partner. They love this person. They want to stay married and preserve those years, those memories. They don't want to upset the applecart, hurt their children, lose their job, or anything else. They just want to explore those cravings of bdsm. They don't want to die and feel like there is something they haven't done. It doesn't matter what gender the explorer is. How do you do it without hurting your partnership? (Unless you have been in a really long marriage, don't tell me that exploring doesn't hurt the relationship. There comes a time when buying the wrong shampoo hurts the relationship- or at least causes unpleasant friction... because nothing is as fun as spending an evening defending yourself that you still love this person, even though you don't care enough to pay atttention enough to what their needs are- even when it comes to shampoo. Sound trivial- it is, except when one's self esteem is bound to another in that fashion.) Just put yourself, for a moment, in their shoes- and tell me what you think a solution is. It's not the dynamic I want in my personal life- but I have toys in my professional life who are married. Since I don't see them in person, I don't feel I'm going to hell for it. Alison Applauds fungasm! I have met several people in that situation, in those shoes. While I don't like lying or cheating or sneaking ... I feel for people who deeply love their spouses, they don't WANT to leave as maybe 90% of their needs are met in that relationship ... but there's that nagging 10% of bdsm need. Many of them have attempted to interest their spouse and been rebuffed and had to take a lot of effort to rebuild the damage that brave venture created. Whilst it is best if the spouse knows and accepts this need must be met elsewhere, this is not always possible. I will play with such people as long as: 1. It is occasional and doesn't take undue time away from the family relationships (less than most hobbies would) 2. It is non-sexual play (impact play, bondage, wax, sensation play etc) 3. There is no ongoing D/s between U/us which could create tensions and conflicts of interest ie the roles exist only within the context of the scene In a sense it is "scratching the itch" ... and if doing that, within those boundaries, helps that person to be happy and content in an established relationship, does no harm to them or to Me ... I can live with that. Maam Jay aka violet[A]
_____________________________
Life is a song ... and I love singing it! (By me!)
|