Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
I would think several days of whining about me being here would justify a humourous reminder that he has something else to do than try to harass me off the board. And I fail to see how making light of merc's obsession somehow insults Beth. It certainly isn't my "little testosterone war". merc could have moved on a long time ago. I certainly did. As for what you decide to do and feel ...<shrug> That's really up to you, isn't it? I've already said I don't pander for popularity. 'nuff said on that. Moving on. On edit: Just noticed the statement I highlighted. Fact is, Bita, merc has already brought my wife into this by denying her existence and claiming this is a ploy to lure in the sympathetic. Perhaps you missed that in the "decline of collarme" thread. I just consider the source and move on. Bob's a GREAT source of material and amusement and I hope he never leaves! Whining that he's here? Come now - how would I learn the one true way? I also hope to find out about who all the other "us" and "we"s are he keeps referring. I also need to know how many "nuff said"s it takes to be enough. I also want to set a record for CM as the profile most blocked and unblocked by a another profile. I also enjoy the image of him peeking through his figers to read my posts. So I like pandering to immaturity - its a personal weekness. However - setting the record straight - this is the spouse reference: Someone said quote: But the guy met his wife on a personals site, lived the lifestyle for many years, and is now a widower. He's a grandfather. He's getting back on this horse and trying to ride it again. I responded: And you believe his story without reservation? Have you also given your banking information to spouses of wrongly imprisoned or killed Nigerian ministers and expect to soon be receiving 20% of the $50 Million in your account? There is no difference. But hell, anyone who blocks any dissenting or contrary position will make a GREAT dom. Only a fraud runs away from debate and challenge. Only an insecure coward hides behind the block button. I don't recall 'Insecure', 'Coward' and 'Fraud' ever being listed as ideal dom traits. The only other reference I made was this: When someone gives their personal loss history it points to wondering if they have nothing else to offer, so they go for the 'sympathy submissive'. I wonder if I announced, when I began my search in 2002, that I had survived 9/11 by making a golf date instead of showing up at my office at 8:30 on the 97th floor as planned on that day I would have generated more activity by going the "poor, poor me" route. Do submissives really buy into that "woe is me" story and find it attractive? I stand behind both statements. Integrity isn't something to be turned on and off. Bob illustrated all the bad aspects of on-line. Insecurity, a cowardly stance regarding challenge, a false authority; my doubt regarding his history is based upon him. He's given enough reason to doubt. His integrity and insecurity is documented. We appreciate those coming to our defense. Trust me, beth's amused, and actually believes one of the recent requests she's gotten for permission to lick he boots came from Bob. - Who knows? You can believe whatever you want if it fits your fantasy and makes you happy. But this is the internet. There are no facts here unless their verified. Who can know if beth really exists? If she does and she died, I wouldn't be so insecure as to reference her so people will hesitate to disagree with me or throw me a mercy submissive. I think it would taint their name and my memory to use her for that purpose. Obviously Bob feels differently - he's entitled. However, when you get emotional or upset about words printed here from people, and have to hide behind a block - it speaks to some deeper problems and issues.
< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 8/29/2007 7:35:05 AM >
|