RE: baggage (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


defiantbadgirl -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:46:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ServeMeInVA

Everyone over 17 normally has baggage.
It is best to learn what the baggage is, as soon as possible.
Then I can decide if their baggage is a deal breaker for me.
There is a lot of baggage I can deal with, and some I will not deal with.
The key is finding out what the baggage is, quickly and before you become
emotionally involved.


Therein lies the problem. People react to different types of baggage in different ways. How often do you avoid becoming involved just because baggage is of a certain type when the woman has never taken any of it out on you? This is the exact point I'm trying to make.......ASSUMING.




AquaticSub -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:47:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

How would you feel if people frequently refused to get to know you based on assumption?


It happens. There are plenty of men who wouldn't involved with me because I have too much sexual experience, despite my getting tested and being 100 percent clean. You just get over it. They don't matter. Stop thinking they do and wasting your time on them.

I don't like men who look like my exes or have more baggage than I can handle. The men I have rejected got over it and found women who thought they were fucking awesome. When men rejected me because I was too sexual (it's happened more than once) I got over it and found someone who thought I was fucking awesome.

Again - it's not the baggage that you have that matters. It's how you handle your baggage. If you keep being rejected because of your baggage, stop looking to the men and start looking at yourself.




RCdc -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:48:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

I know many men who have baggage as well, but few like to call it that or even think about it. Many (not all) are too busy avoiding possible baggage others may or may not take out on them. Of course men get hurt by women. Otherwise they wouldn't have said baggage. I sympathize with them just like I do with women who have been hurt. I'm also glad they have far less chance of being seen as damaged goods and avoided. Both women and men are hurt by the opposite sex (unless they prefer the same sex). Women as a general rule don't have the "warning, possible baggage, assume the worst, avoid at all costs" mentality toward men, so men shouldn't have that attitude toward women.


I disagree.  Women are just as prone to exude the whole 'warning' mentality... I have also seen women condone men as weak when they admit to being caught up in and ex's baggage and dumped so hard just because they admit to having a soft side.
 
I don't believe that baggage is one sided, nor that people (ie in your opinion - men -) see women as the chief handlers of all baggage.  What I do see is people trying to seperate sexes and orientation continuously instead of accepting that people just deal with things in different ways due to peer pressure and social pressure.  Why can the questions not be - why do people think that baggage is negative.  Or - what is a red flag in your subjective point of view - instead of making it a battle of the sexes or orientations?
 
I believe it comes down to people wanting to belong to something - so they create these little groups and cliques in their own minds so they can set out tearing them down or so they can claim victimisation - instead of just realising not everyone thinks the same and just agree to disagree.  Not everything is a personal attack unless you make it one.
 
Peace
the.dark.




ServeMeInVA -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:48:54 PM)

If he can't handle your baggage than he is not the man for you.
One day you will learn, you normally can not change people, especially for long.
They can only change themselves, you should not be involved with men that can not
accept you.




MstrSkyWoIf -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:50:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gypsy girl

quote:

But the majority of people who have the "if there is any chance someone might have baggage, assume the worst and avoid" mentality are male.


I see this sort of thing coming from women all the time.  A lot of the 'red flags' people put out as reasons to avoid something could be read specifically as 'red flags alerting the casual observer to baggage' which is why I don't participate in 'red flag' discussions. 

Take the commonly mentioned red flag, the other only gives you a cell phone # and no land line #.  I only have a cell phone, and the reason I only have a cell phone is because 1) a D was using my land line to harass me which is the same as saying I have baggage and 2) two phones are expensive and I'm divorced with a kid and didn't come out of my marriage with the healthiest financial portfolio which is the same as saying I have baggage and 3) my ex pays for my cell phone because he's a control freak and wants 'us' to be on a family plan so he can talk to the kids whenever the spirit moves him without having to worry about expenses because he's also broke which is the same as saying I have baggage. 

Another one is the other person only accepts calls at a specific time.  Again, when I was looking, I generally did calls by appointment largely because I have kids and don't want to be constantly interrupted, distracted or faced with the prospect of dividing my attention between my ums and a potential D which is the same as saying I have baggage.

These are only the first two examples that came to mind, but I'm sure there are others.  A red flag is considered a warning.  What is it a warning of?  I would say in many cases its a warning that the other person has some baggage.  To the extent that this is the case, you're position is contradictory.


All valid points and none of them I would consider a RED Flags Many of them I can relate to as well. 




RCdc -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:52:04 PM)

There is nothing wrong with making an assumption.
That leads to communication and then the presumption.
 
Making a false presumption before communication, is where the problem arises.
 
Peace
the.dark.




MstrSkyWoIf -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:53:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

I know many men who have baggage.
I am just a little tired of the sexist and anti-orientation threads.  Like there aren't any big old bad submissives fucking men around.  Now that might have a lot to do with social conditioning.  Any man being open with the fact he has been abused is seen as weak... so you just do not see it mentioned publicly as much.  But in private, it happens just as much.  You just don't see it exercised on message boards.
 
Threads like these perpetuate the myths that female submissives are weak and always get fucked over and never know how to handle themselves or their own history.  That all dominants are all male bad asses who can't be trusted and that switches NEVER suffer(because they are never ever mentioned in threads like this).  It creates them and us attitudes.  It is a poison.
 
When the reality is, maybe men just know how to pick and choose who they discuss intimate details with, and do not choose to gossip about their loses in public... and switches really do have their heads screwed on tighter and arent as 'confused' as some people would like to make them out to be.
 
Peace
the.dark.




I agree with you as I have met a few of these submissives you speak of... It goes both ways but you are right most men will not admit they where taken advantage of.




umisprite -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:57:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrSkyWoIf
My statement was based on your continued insistence that Doms are not willing to be with a submissive with baggage.


Coming a little late into the dance...
 
I will admit that during my last relationship there was an issue from the past  I was holding on to and at times projected onto my current partner. What did he do? He sat me down one night and addressed the issue in a serious yet compassionate tone. We discussed it, agreed to work on it and that was that. A few months later he commented on how well he thought I had progressed on that particular issue. And I agreed. It really was quite freeing to finally be able to let go.
 
I have never had the occurence of someone not wanting to get to know me because of some perceived baggage perhaps because my philosophy truly is that you can not grab the future while holding on to the past.

Would a mentor have prevented me from experiencing the initial pain? Probably not, I was in love. Would a mentor have known that I would carry that baggage to the door of my next relationship...maybe, but would it have helped me let go of said baggage?  Not so sure about that either. I am firmly planted in the live and learn and let go garden.




domiguy -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 4:57:11 PM)

I think we are confusing two completely different topics....I have met a lot of people in my travels....There are some that might carry a little emotional baggage forward from a previous relationship....They might say something like, "Domiguy, I really got raked over the coals pretty good in my last relationship...Do you mind if we take this thing kinda slow?....Of course now you have a choice to make...If she meets your physical qualifications, you click, the conversation is all good, and it seems like she has got her shit together outside of battling with some relationship issues you probably might consider moving forward.  I would probably tell her, " I know what you are going through, so for you I might be willing to implement the three date rule."

Then there is the other type of person...The one who is just plain fucked up...They were fucked up before their first relationship and they will probably stay fucked up till they are placed in the hole.  They may think that they have baggage...But see, that is the problem with being fucked up...You are so fucked up that you attribute your failures to baggage instead of recognizing that it is your own fucked upness that is getting in the way of all of your relationships and actually bleeding over into them and thereby royally fucking them up...Now how fucked up is that shit?




missturbation -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 5:05:22 PM)

Everyone has baggage in my opinion but it's how we carry it that counts.
There are those who learn from it and pack it away. It doesnt leave you but you live with it.
Then there are those who project it on to others. Completely unhealthy and unfair in my opinion and quite often happens. Maybe this is where the 'oh no shes got baggage im off' attitude comes from.
On a lighter note this thread made me think of one of my fave songs - shes got by the offspring.
'I'm seeing this girl and she just might be out of her mind
Well she's got baggage and it's all the emotional kind
She talks about closure and that validation bit
I don't mean to be insensitive, but I really hate that shit

Oh man she's got issues
And I'm gonna pay
She thinks she's the victim
Yeah

Now I know she'll feel abandoned
If I don't stay over late
And I know she's afraid to commit
But it's only our second date

I don't know why you're messed up
I don't know why your whole life is a chore
Just do me a favor
And check your baggage at the door'

Just some of my fave lyrics from it [:D]




MstrSkyWoIf -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 5:11:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: toservez

Every one has baggage men and women and dominants and submissives.

It is not the baggage to avoid or run from but if the person’s baggage is too out front of the person. Basically, if the person makes their baggage a controlling issue to another person in how a relationship is to take place.

Let’s take being a victim of cheating. A man who tells a woman he only has a cell phone might perk up the ears of the woman but if that is all she has as a clue the man might be married then that is her issue not his.

A man who wants a submissive to always call where they are and not let their woman talk to another man in almost all situations because at one time they were a victim of cheating is letting their baggage interfere with the relationship.

I agree Darcyandthedark that this portrayal of woman are victims and men are the abusers is just wrong and the constant getting into this life of dominant equals strong and does not need to be careful or protect themselves and woman submissive is weak and needs to be super duper protective just does a flat out disservice to both men and women and this lifestyle.

We all have baggage the key is how we deal with it and let it affect us and our relationships.



I agree with what you have said here however Darcyandthedark pointed out and I think he is correct most men do not want to admit they have been taken advantage of because they feel it makes them look weak. I feel it just makes them human. I have been taken advantage of in the past. I don't dwell on it and I don't let it effect my current relationship or at least do my best not to but then I am human. I do tend to try and save people from themselves even though I know you can not. This tends to open me up to be taken advantage of by others. When this happens I have a choice I can shut that giving part of me down so I am not taken advantage of or I can learn and move on still being the type of person I feel I should be based on my feelings about life. I chose to learn and move on. I pack the bag on that situation and don't Cary it around I leave it on the shelve of lessons in life and move on.




MstrSkyWoIf -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 6:42:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: umisprite

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrSkyWoIf
My statement was based on your continued insistence that Doms are not willing to be with a submissive with baggage.


Coming a little late into the dance...
 
I will admit that during my last relationship there was an issue from the past  I was holding on to and at times projected onto my current partner. What did he do? He sat me down one night and addressed the issue in a serious yet compassionate tone. We discussed it, agreed to work on it and that was that. A few months later he commented on how well he thought I had progressed on that particular issue. And I agreed. It really was quite freeing to finally be able to let go.
 
I have never had the occurence of someone not wanting to get to know me because of some perceived baggage perhaps because my philosophy truly is that you can not grab the future while holding on to the past.

Would a mentor have prevented me from experiencing the initial pain? Probably not, I was in love. Would a mentor have known that I would carry that baggage to the door of my next relationship...maybe, but would it have helped me let go of said baggage?  Not so sure about that either. I am firmly planted in the live and learn and let go garden.


Your last partner is a wise man..




RRafe -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 10:10:12 PM)

My advice for those who find themselves in an unhappy place.

move.




Bobkgin -> RE: baggage (8/29/2007 11:12:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

To those out there who love to assume the worst. Just because someone has been in a few failed relationships does not mean this person will take it out on you. Until the person actually takes something out on you, all you're doing is assuming. Before you start assuming the worst in others, take a long look at yourself. How many failed relationships have you been in? How would you feel if people frequently refused to get to know you based on assumption?


Defiant,

You're asking for compassion from those who are embracing fear.

Consider that the universe is unfolding as it should, that those who know fear are not for those of us who know compassion.

Those who know fear are doomed to be alone till they overcome their fear, even if they have partners.

For those who know fear cannot know trust, and without trust they are, indeed, alone.

Granted, those who know compassion are rare, but are they less prized for that? less cherished?

Not by those who understand them.

Not by those whose compassion seeks out those with compassion.

So breathe easy, knowing the universe is not without its purpose, and not without its rules regarding those with compassion.

For what is compassion without faith?

And what hope is there for the fearful who have no faith?




MstrSkyWoIf -> RE: baggage (8/30/2007 12:04:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bobkgin

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

To those out there who love to assume the worst. Just because someone has been in a few failed relationships does not mean this person will take it out on you. Until the person actually takes something out on you, all you're doing is assuming. Before you start assuming the worst in others, take a long look at yourself. How many failed relationships have you been in? How would you feel if people frequently refused to get to know you based on assumption?


Defiant,

You're asking for compassion from those who are embracing fear.

Consider that the universe is unfolding as it should, that those who know fear are not for those of us who know compassion.

Those who know fear are doomed to be alone till they overcome their fear, even if they have partners.

For those who know fear cannot know trust, and without trust they are, indeed, alone.

Granted, those who know compassion are rare, but are they less prized for that? less cherished?

Not by those who understand them.

Not by those whose compassion seeks out those with compassion.

So breathe easy, knowing the universe is not without its purpose, and not without its rules regarding those with compassion.

For what is compassion without faith?

And what hope is there for the fearful who have no faith?


Again Sir you show how wise you are.. You have such a good way with the correct words to show compassion and understanding and at the same time show your thoughts in an understandable form.




chellekitty -> RE: baggage (8/30/2007 12:06:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

[sm=banghead.gif]


by the time i got to this a hot poker in the eye was looking like a better option than reading the rest of this thread...i didn't torture myself by reading each and every reply...self-masochism only goes so far....




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125