Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 10:43:36 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
But there are laws about being an asshole on others private property.  It s a locational thing.  There are laws about depriving others of thier rights.  The PA was cut, the guy kept screaming, and refused to sit down and let the next person speak.  He was ejected.  He physically and verbally resisted.  He was placed under arrest.  he resisted further and got tazed.  The students got to continue with the education they were spending thier time and money on.

In this case, properly trained Officers did the right thing.  At least according to the law, the actuall law, not the make believe one some people use.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 10:47:36 AM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjohnson

The daughter analogy was not the best, considering this was involving a political demonstration where the young man was clearly out of hand. You can argue about this all day long if you like and no one will be happy with what comes at the end of the day.

What would you have done if you were giving a speech and someone started acting the way he did?


If his actions rise to the status of Crimes, then by all means he should be arrested.

So, we're back to my question: Exactly what crime was committed by the asshole? And whom was the complainant?

You cannot be resisting an arrest, without, you know, being arrested FOR SOMETHING.


Disturbing the peace and similar statutes are a reasonable person standard.  That is if a reasonable person under similar circumstances would feel that their peace was disturbed, then it is a crime. They dont necessarily require a complaint, in fact, post OJ many jurisdictions did away with a the requirement for a private signing of complaints.  So yes, behaving very badly in public is grounds for an arrest without a private complaint or reporting party.

< Message edited by laurell3 -- 10/27/2007 10:49:27 AM >

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 10:53:44 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: laurell3

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjohnson

The daughter analogy was not the best, considering this was involving a political demonstration where the young man was clearly out of hand. You can argue about this all day long if you like and no one will be happy with what comes at the end of the day.

What would you have done if you were giving a speech and someone started acting the way he did?


If his actions rise to the status of Crimes, then by all means he should be arrested.

So, we're back to my question: Exactly what crime was committed by the asshole? And whom was the complainant?

You cannot be resisting an arrest, without, you know, being arrested FOR SOMETHING.


Disturbing the peace and similar statutes are a reasonable person standard. That is if a reasonable person under similar circumstances would feel that their peace was disturbed. They dont necessarily require a complaint, in fact, post OJ many jurisdictions did away with a the requirement for a private signing of complaints. So yes, behaving very badly in public is grounds for an arrest without a private complaint or reporting party.


Does the act of "shouting out questions", at an event of this nature, rise to the level of disturbing a "reasonable person"?

Well, I don't see any statements except the Police, and from the video, the "Reasonable Person" wasn't having their peace disturbed. Let's ask JOHN KERRY if his appearance was disturbed?

YouTube Video Tape starting at 2:34

POLICE [in background]: "Get down!"

Senator Kerry: "Hey officers ... could we ... Hey folks ... I think that if everybody just..."

POLICE: "Do it now!"

Senator Kerry: "... calms down this situation would calm down. [unintelligible] ...I'll answer his question. Unfortunately, he is not available to come up here and swear me in as President."

Andrew Meyer: "Why are they arresting me? Did someone do something here? Are they arresting?"

Senator Kerry: "Let me just say. because it is a very important question."

And further, this statement:

http://kerry.senate.gov/cfm/record.cfm?id=283508


“In 37 years of public appearances, through wars, protests and highly emotional events, I have never had a dialogue end this way. I believe I could have handled the situation without interruption, but I do not know what warnings or other exchanges transpired between the young man and the police prior to his barging to the front of the line and their intervention. I asked the police to allow me to answer the question and was in the process of responding when he was taken into custody. I was not aware that a taser was used until after I left the building. I hope that neither the student nor any of the police were injured. I regret enormously that a good healthy discussion was interrupted."

So the "Reasonable Person" standard was clearly not met.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 10:59:02 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

But there are laws about being an asshole on others private property. It s a locational thing. There are laws about depriving others of thier rights. The PA was cut, the guy kept screaming, and refused to sit down and let the next person speak. He was ejected. He physically and verbally resisted. He was placed under arrest. he resisted further and got tazed. The students got to continue with the education they were spending thier time and money on.

In this case, properly trained Officers did the right thing. At least according to the law, the actuall law, not the make believe one some people use.



KERRY is on record as telling the police he would answer the question, quite clearly on the Youtube video.

Unless you're in a POLICE STATE, the Police don't get to make the call to eject you.

The COMPLAINANT from the speaker's board is the person who tells the Police to remove the trespasser.

THEN that COMPLAINANT files charges for trespassing.

Since I haven't been shown any statements from any COMPLAINANT, then we'll just have to speculate *why* the police overstepped their bounds. IIRC, from their statements, they were working overtime details. Perhaps they shouldn't have been working overtime, as their judgment was compromised by fatigue?

Piss Poor Training... Piss Poor Supervision == Negligible Discipline.

It's the same problem the military has with Discipline.


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 11:00:08 AM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
fargle, I dont know...I was just correcting the misinterpretation that someone has to actually swear out and file a complaint, which used to be the case in many places but isn't always true anymore due to the upgraded victimless prosecution standards post OJ.
l

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 11:37:36 AM   
bigjohnson


Posts: 43
Joined: 11/21/2005
Status: offline
Fargle...I want to tase you.

(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 11:39:49 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjohnson

Fargle...I want to tase you.


Johnson, don't do that, he'll use all CAPS on you.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to bigjohnson)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 12:04:47 PM   
bigjohnson


Posts: 43
Joined: 11/21/2005
Status: offline
We don't want him to get really angry and tell me that I am violating his rights by posting on an online message board. I think I just stole his next post. Whoops.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 12:13:11 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
No, its a diffeRent One that sometimes blathers about suing over this stuff.

(in reply to bigjohnson)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 4:12:57 PM   
Petronius


Posts: 289
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjohnson

Fargle...you are the kind of person that everyone hates to be in a conversation with because you always have to try and make a point even if it is ludicrous. Someone had to call in security otherwise they would never have gone in there to apprehend him. Did you notice how when the officers attempted to escort him out of the hall he tried to stay. They are just doing their job, just like I am sure you do yours every day.


I haven't seen any ludicrous point, save for what seems to be fantasy by bigjohnson.

In the early videotapes Kerry was heard saying that he wanted to answer the questions.

Ergo, where was the disruption? There was none. No disruption, no basis for an arrest. No basis for an arrest, no basis for the cop to use the taser. No basis for tasering, and you have an armed criminal (the cop) who used a weapon on a citizen. That is, I believe, called "assault with a deadly weapon" and can get you double digits in prison. Or can if you are not a cop.

bigjohnson, writing "Someone had to call in security otherwise they would never have gone in there to apprehend him" simply seeks to justify police violence. In essence, he claims it never exists. In bigjohnson's declared universe no cop would have tried an arrest without at least being called.

(in reply to bigjohnson)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/27/2007 4:28:29 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjohnson

Fargle...I want to tase you.


Johnson, don't do that, he'll use all CAPS on you.


I don't use all caps. I use Comic Case.

There's a difference.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/28/2007 4:19:24 PM   
CollegeConundrum


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
Mmmmm, sorry, but... no.  You are describing security guards, and calling them /police/LEOs.  Many campuses have both.
Please feel free to provide a link supporting your assertion that FDLE is not the agency overseeing university police in Florida
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cjst/Publications/AgencyAddresses/State%20Agencies%20Directory.pdf




Here's an idea, FIND IT YOURSELF.

I live in California, I go to school in California, I know the fucking laws.  It's not my problem, if you don't.

In California, campus cops aren't fucking cops.

[Mod Nte:  flame removed]



< Message edited by ModeratorEleven -- 10/28/2007 6:43:24 PM >

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/28/2007 4:56:31 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
You mean like this?


quote:

Police Department Authority
The University of California Police Department's police officers are sworn peace officers. They
derive their peace officer status from Section 830.2 (b) of the California Penal Code. By
authority of Section 92600 of the Education Code of the State of California and the Board of the
Regents of the University of California, these peace officers are responsible for providing police
services to the University of California. They enforce all laws on property owned, operated, or
controlled by the Board of Regents and provide the full range of police services. The officers
are graduates of California Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) certified training
academies and continually undergo training to maintain their state certification and professional
skills.
The UCSF Police Department has demonstrated excellence to law enforcement by living up to
a body of standards to become accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law
Enforcement Agencies, Inc.



http://www.police.ucsf.edu/documents/1998.pdf





(in reply to CollegeConundrum)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/28/2007 7:42:19 PM   
CollegeConundrum


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline
A 7 year old document for laws that were changed 3-4 years ago?

Good job!

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 8:16:40 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
Actually, the 2006 revised code says the same thing. Whether you agree or not, campus police are sworn LEOs (under the authority of the BOR), and security is security, just like Florida and elsewhere.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=67101610313+11+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve



Keep up the fantastic work.

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 9:13:09 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
Without getting into detail about tasers but when was it that it became unacceptable in democratic societies to persistently ask a politician pertinent questions?

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 1:11:16 PM   
CollegeConundrum


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

Actually, the 2006 revised code says the same thing. Whether you agree or not, campus police are sworn LEOs (under the authority of the BOR), and security is security, just like Florida and elsewhere.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=67101610313+11+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve



Keep up the fantastic work.


You posted a dead link to backup your "argument"?

You're a real champ.

Edit: I guess I can't expect you to post a real link because that's not how campus departments are run....

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 3:04:10 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
OK, let's see exactly where the law that you claim to know says what you claim it says, that  "They're "deputized" by the PD or SD, whoever is responsible for overseeing the campus police."


CALIFORNIA CODES
PENAL CODE
SECTION 830-832.17

quote:

  830.2.  The following persons are peace officers whose authority
extends to any place in the state:

... (b) A member of the University of California Police Department
appointed pursuant to Section 92600 of the Education Code, provided
that the primary duty of the peace officer shall be the enforcement
of the law within the area specified in Section 92600 of the
Education Code.
(c) A member of the California State University Police Departments
appointed pursuant to Section 89560 of the Education Code, provided
that the primary duty of the peace officer shall be the enforcement
of the law within the area specified in Section 89560 of the
Education Code.




CALIFORNIA CODES
EDUCATION CODE
SECTION 89560-89561
quote:





89560.  The trustees may appoint one or more persons to constitute a
police department for the headquarters and for each campus of the
California State University.  Persons employed and compensated as
members of a California State University police department, when so
appointed and duly sworn, are peace officers.  However, such peace
officers shall not exercise their powers or authority except (a) at
the headquarters or upon any campus of the California State
University and in an area within one mile of the exterior boundaries
of each campus or the headquarters, and in or about other grounds or
properties owned, operated, controlled, or administered by the
California State University, or by trustees or the state on behalf of
the California State University, and (b) as provided in Section
830.2 of the Penal Code.



89561.  Every member of a California State University police
department shall be supplied with, and authorized to wear, a badge
bearing the words "California State University Police."





quote:

92600.  The Regents of the University of California are authorized
and empowered to appoint one or more persons to be members of the
University of California police department as such police department
is constituted on September 19, 1947, or may thereafter be
constituted.  Persons employed and compensated as members of said
police department, when so appointed and duly sworn, are peace
officers; provided, that such officers shall not exercise their
powers or authority except (a) upon the campuses of the University of
California and an area within one mile of the exterior boundaries of
each thereof, (b) in or about other grounds or properties owned,
operated, controlled or administered by the Regents of the University
of California, and (c) as provided in Section 830.2 of the Penal
Code.


92601.  Every member of the University of California police
department shall be supplied with, and authorized to wear, a badge
bearing the words "University of California Police."




Follow your own advice, and look it up yourself... California Penal Code 830.2.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html

You might learn something...Or not.

< Message edited by Alumbrado -- 10/29/2007 3:05:16 PM >

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 5:58:23 PM   
CollegeConundrum


Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
You might learn something...Or not.


If there is something to learn here, it's not from you.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 8:58:58 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
Which is why I didn't hide behind  the refusal to provide evidence, as you did... I posted the  facts, not my unsupported opinion, so that anyone could see for themselves.

It isn't my job to cure the ignorance of others, but making fun of it is somewhat of a hobby. Thanks for the freebie, keep up the fantastic work.

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109