RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/29/2007 9:17:59 PM

CollegeConundrum

Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

Which is why I didn't hide behind the refusal to provide evidence, as you did... I posted the facts, not my unsupported opinion, so that anyone could see for themselves.

7 year old facts.

I guess I could just post a some random other country's LE code and say "LOOK LOOK CAMPUS COPS ARE COPS! SEE! SEE I'M SMERT!" and be "right" like you too.

(in reply to Alumbrado)

Profile

Post #: 81

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 7:25:02 AM

camille65

Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007
From: Austin Texas
Status: offline

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21541335/from/RS.1/

A bit of follow-up on this story.

_____________________________

~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)

Profile

Post #: 82

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 7:28:27 AM

Alumbrado

Posts: 5560
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CollegeConundrum

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

Which is why I didn't hide behind the refusal to provide evidence, as you did... I posted the facts, not my unsupported opinion, so that anyone could see for themselves.

7 year old facts.

I guess I could just post a some random other country's LE code and say "LOOK LOOK CAMPUS COPS ARE COPS! SEE! SEE I'M SMERT!" and be "right" like you too.

I'd settle for you proving that the 2006 Code is 7 years old...

Have fun with your trolling, and keep up the fantastic work.

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)

Profile

Post #: 83

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 8:53:14 AM

meticulousgirl

Posts: 969
Joined: 2/20/2007
Status: offline

oh God here we go again...how pathetic...

~meticulous~

(in reply to juliaoceania)

Profile

Post #: 84

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 9:47:14 AM

farglebargle

Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: camille65

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21541335/from/RS.1/

A bit of follow-up on this story.

Yup. That's how I expected this to wind up.

No Complainant could be found to testify that they authorized the police officers to act in his removal. The DA is totally fucked, as with no Trespassing Charge, means there was no lawful arrest to be resisting. Once that's tossed, there's no disturbance to The Peace.

Everyone's just letting this drop and hope it goes away.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to camille65)

Profile

Post #: 85

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 9:55:14 AM

camille65

Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007
From: Austin Texas
Status: offline

Everyone including the tazed guy ( I keep forgetting his name, which may be his preference lol)

_____________________________

~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).

(in reply to farglebargle)

Profile

Post #: 86

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 10:01:57 AM

CollegeConundrum

Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
I'd settle for you proving that the 2006 Code is 7 years old...

Have fun with your trolling, and keep up the fantastic work.

still waiting for that 06 code, chief. It's still a dead link and you still have no argument.

(in reply to Alumbrado)

Profile

Post #: 87

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 11:01:34 AM

luckydog1

Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline

"No Complainant could be found to testify that they authorized the police officers to act in his removal. The DA is totally fucked, as with no Trespassing Charge, means there was no lawful arrest to be resisting. Once that's tossed, there's no disturbance to The Peace. "

Did you even read the article Farg? The DA is in no way fucked whatsoever. The police recomended charges be filed, the student wrote a letter admitting guilt, so the charges were dropped, and the student goes back to school in January.

There is nothing in the article to suggest the conclusions you state. What we can see between the lines, is that the kids lawyer had him formally apoligize and admit guilt, so the University didn't want him to be charged with a felony. If the kid had not appologized, and been publically defiant about it, and the charges were still dropped---your reading might apply. But the exact opposite happened in real life. Make believe law for the make believe land....

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)

Profile

Post #: 88

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 11:07:04 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

well it is obviously the work of communists, you can see it and infer it from the link as others do all the time, here and elsewhere.............it has really been elevated to an art form.

hint hint.

Ron

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/30/2007 11:10:07 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to luckydog1)

Profile

Post #: 89

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 11:13:13 AM

luckydog1

Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline

Sorry I must have confused you again Ron. Now since you bring it up, what about your false statement that the word(s) communis* doesn't appear anywhere in the given links? Were you having a problem reading? Or were you lying? Or are you still pretending they are not there? Or just going to spout jibberish?

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 90

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 11:15:21 AM

Alumbrado

Posts: 5560
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CollegeConundrum

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
I'd settle for you proving that the 2006 Code is 7 years old...

Have fun with your trolling, and keep up the fantastic work.

still waiting for that 06 code, chief. It's still a dead link and you still have no argument.

The second link works fine, and it is patently untrue that it is 'still a dead link'.

You are just in denial since it leads to the 2006 California Penal Code, containing the proof that your claim about PDs and SDs was bogus.

Since you won't deal in facts, enjoy your fantastic beliefs. But you will have to get someone else to respond to your trollage.

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)

Profile

Post #: 91

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 11:19:04 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

communist may have appeared in one of the links. No actual proof was proffered that these people were communis*.

I have watched you spout gibberish at length, and hardly see that you do not allow the leeway for others to attempt to spout maybe a quarter of your output.

As you see what the officers recommending charging him with, it is not so make believe a law as it is a make believe infraction of anything.

Ron

your turn at the gibberish, bud.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to luckydog1)

Profile

Post #: 92

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 11:21:08 AM

farglebargle

Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

"No Complainant could be found to testify that they authorized the police officers to act in his removal. The DA is totally fucked, as with no Trespassing Charge, means there was no lawful arrest to be resisting. Once that's tossed, there's no disturbance to The Peace. "

Did you even read the article Farg? The DA is in no way fucked whatsoever.

Well, I consider "Not having a case" to be fucked. I guess some might spin it differently.

quote:

The police recomended charges be filed

Which isn't a Complainant filing a complaint for Trespassing, the appropriate charge which would have permitted the Police to then lawfully arrest him.

You know, Due Process can be such a bitch, can't it? All these requirements and shit...

quote:

, the student wrote a letter admitting guilt,

Admitting guilt to the non-existent charges? That's a heck of a trick.

Nice spin attempt, though.

quote:

so the charges were dropped,

The charges which were never filed?

That's interesting. I didn't see him admit guilt to either the Disorderly Conduct charge, OR the Resisting Charge, which he CANNOT DO, as the charges don't exist with the DA dropping the case.

I mean, admitting guilt to charges which don't exist. That's classic.

quote:

There is nothing in the article to suggest the conclusions you state. What we can see between the lines, is that the kids lawyer had him formally apoligize and admit guilt, so the University didn't want him to be charged with a felony.

Charged by WHOM? I still haven't seen either a misdemeanor or felony complaint from someone with standing.

What COMPETENT attorney would ever let their client admit ANYTHING???

Yeah, you make believe that it played out the way you want. Of course, in that fantasy land, he would have been charged.

It's clear the police were out of control. They didn't even hear the US Senator telling them what to do.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to luckydog1)

Profile

Post #: 93

RE: "Don't tase me, bro!" revisited - 10/30/2007 12:51:07 PM

CollegeConundrum

Posts: 322
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
The second link works fine, and it is patently untrue that it is 'still a dead link'.

You are just in denial since it leads to the 2006 California Penal Code, containing the proof that your claim about PDs and SDs was bogus.

Since you won't deal in facts, enjoy your fantastic beliefs. But you will have to get someone else to respond to your trollage.

You must have been a star on your university debate team.

You win every argument with "You're wrong" and contribute no facts, whatsoever.

A real winning combination.

(in reply to Alumbrado)

Profile

Post #: 94