RE: Ok. This might just be the limit.

RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

kitttty -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:18:53 PM)
Why did I waste all this time getting these opinions from strangers who do not know me and cannot possibly claim they care more about me than the Master? I should have simply dedicated my time to law school apps. I barely got half an LSAT done today. I dont care what the difference between passive and submissive is. I dont know what a sense of self is supposed to mean and I dont care either so long as I feel happy and loved. Should I trust the Master 100%? 90%? What I know is that I trust strangers on the internet 0%.

Aswad -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:19:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael This sounds like what the gorian girls talk about. Not to be confused with Gorean girls, obviously. [;)] Seriously, though, there are plenty of clueless dimwits who call themselves that and fit your description. Yet, there are also a bunch of ignorant and/or abusive twats who call their shit BDSM, no? Personally, I'd prefer to judge by e.g. Archer, rather than e.g. Homolka. Et tu? Health, al-Aswad.

apiercedkitty -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:20:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kitttty There are a lot of things I would do if married and would not do if not. Like getting the Master's name tattooed on my ass- I think its hot but Im not going to do that now. The prospect of having my pics on a publizied blog and having my public reputation risked is also sexy but its impossible now as I might need my reputation in tact. Just my opinion here but tattooing ANY man's name on your ass is not overly intelligent. And, don't we ALWAYS want our reputation intact?? Whether we're "married" or not??

dcnovice -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:24:31 PM)
quote: Why did I waste all this time getting these opinions from strangers who do not know me and cannot possibly claim they care more about me than the Master? Theory 1: Hearing others criticize your master allowed you to rush to his defense, shifting your anger from him to the posters on the thread. Theory 2: Procrastination from your law-school stuff

apiercedkitty -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:27:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xoxi I also didn't read "no matter how bad the relationship is its OK if we're married" - I read it as saying "I'm willing to accept his judgement in certain areas if I'm confident he will catch me if I fall." See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls?

Kirata -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:33:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kitttty What I know is that I trust strangers on the internet 0%. Well hot damn, see how much you've grown up in just the short time you've been here? We must be helping you! [sm=mrpuffy.gif]

kc692 -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:33:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kitttty Why did I waste all this time getting these opinions from strangers who do not know me and cannot possibly claim they care more about me than the Master? I should have simply dedicated my time to law school apps. I barely got half an LSAT done today. I dont care what the difference between passive and submissive is. I dont know what a sense of self is supposed to mean and I dont care either so long as I feel happy and loved. Should I trust the Master 100%? 90%? What I know is that I trust strangers on the internet 0%. Hun, at the risk of entering this thread one more time when I said I was through, and not meaning to sound harsh, but I saw absolutely noone try to tell you they cared for you more than your master does, ....most of us in fact wasted a large portion of our day also when trying to speak sense to you, not because you are you, but possibly a person that MIGHT have listened to sense(we all found out that was wrong). I truly wish you luck in life, I have a feeling you are going to need it in spades.

Aswad -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:33:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls? It doesn't. It guarantees that the state will fill the role of the family member with a baseball bat that settles the score afterwards. While I love planning ahead sometimes, that is just a wee bit too far ahead for me. Might as well just start off with the breakup phase. That from one who still believes in permanent commitment, though, so caveat emptor. Health, al-Aswad.

kc692 -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:35:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: xoxi I also didn't read "no matter how bad the relationship is its OK if we're married" - I read it as saying "I'm willing to accept his judgement in certain areas if I'm confident he will catch me if I fall." See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls? Cuz if she falls on her ass and he should get tired of babysitting her, then she will take half of all his shit, and will do ok anyway.

apiercedkitty -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:40:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: xoxi I also didn't read "no matter how bad the relationship is its OK if we're married" - I read it as saying "I'm willing to accept his judgement in certain areas if I'm confident he will catch me if I fall." See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls? Cuz if she falls on her ass and he should get tired of babysitting her, then she will take half of all his shit, and will do ok anyway. Damn it... now i get it!! Thanks! Whew... i feel better now - knowing she'll get half of ALL his shit as opposed to half of what he acquires while with her (cuz i'm pretty sure that's how it usually works in the real world). That makes MUCH more sense...

SixFootMaster -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:44:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheChauvinist Actually, passive and submissive are synonyms of each other. Assertive and passive are antonyms. Dominant and submissive are antonyms. Dominance != Assertive Submissive != Passive

SixFootMaster -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:47:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: xoxi I also didn't read "no matter how bad the relationship is its OK if we're married" - I read it as saying "I'm willing to accept his judgement in certain areas if I'm confident he will catch me if I fall." See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls? Cuz if she falls on her ass and he should get tired of babysitting her, then she will take half of all his shit, and will do ok anyway. Damn it... now i get it!! Thanks! Whew... i feel better now - knowing she'll get half of ALL his shit as opposed to half of what he acquires while with her (cuz i'm pretty sure that's how it usually works in the real world). That makes MUCH more sense... Actually, in the real word, if there's no legal contract she gets nothing at all.

dcnovice -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:48:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster quote: ORIGINAL: TheChauvinist Actually, passive and submissive are synonyms of each other. Assertive and passive are antonyms. Dominant and submissive are antonyms. Dominance != Assertive Submissive != Passive Another try at using your "logic": Tall and short are antonyms. Dominant and submissive are antonyms. Dominance !=tall Submissive !=short

Aswad -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:49:26 PM)
Depends on what jurisdiction you're in, SFM. Edit: Much as good diction does credit to a jurist, that T had to go.

kc692 -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:49:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: xoxi I also didn't read "no matter how bad the relationship is its OK if we're married" - I read it as saying "I'm willing to accept his judgement in certain areas if I'm confident he will catch me if I fall." See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls? Cuz if she falls on her ass and he should get tired of babysitting her, then she will take half of all his shit, and will do ok anyway. Damn it... now i get it!! Thanks! Whew... i feel better now - knowing she'll get half of ALL his shit as opposed to half of what he acquires while with her (cuz i'm pretty sure that's how it usually works in the real world). That makes MUCH more sense... LOL, I actually agree with you, and think I said it in a MUCH earlier post, she was the one that said he had 1/2 of his LIFE savings hanging if he left her....course, you did say the real world, right, so I don't think that is a concern of hers.

IrishMist -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:49:57 PM)
quote: Actually, in the real word, if there's no legal contract she gets nothing at all. Not true. Some states DO follow the rule of common law. No written, legal contracts needed.

kc692 -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 5:51:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 quote: ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty quote: ORIGINAL: xoxi I also didn't read "no matter how bad the relationship is its OK if we're married" - I read it as saying "I'm willing to accept his judgement in certain areas if I'm confident he will catch me if I fall." See, this is where you lose me... how does a marriage certificate guarantee he'll catch her if she falls? Cuz if she falls on her ass and he should get tired of babysitting her, then she will take half of all his shit, and will do ok anyway. Damn it... now i get it!! Thanks! Whew... i feel better now - knowing she'll get half of ALL his shit as opposed to half of what he acquires while with her (cuz i'm pretty sure that's how it usually works in the real world). That makes MUCH more sense... Actually, in the real word, if there's no legal contract she gets nothing at all. Marriage must be a contract then, or you are not totally reading the post.

Prinsexx -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 6:04:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: Why did I waste all this time getting these opinions from strangers who do not know me and cannot possibly claim they care more about me than the Master? Theory 1: Hearing others criticize your master allowed you to rush to his defense, shifting your anger from him to the posters on the thread. Theory 2: Procrastination from your law-school stuff Theory 3 Stockholm Syndrome. A puzzling reaction to your captor especially not knowing whose side you are on. or changing allegiance. You may get it as an LSAT

Hanable -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 7:00:19 PM)
Kitttty: if ur not going to listen to us like an adult, or at least some one mature enought to have a collar/relationship, why did you post? did you not think people would answer the thread? if so you really are stupid and i am sorry for that. On CM.. please respond/give opinions/rant at anything and almsot everything posted on any board. i dont believe i read one person said they cared about u.. at all actually. now we may care about you because you are a human, we hope, and semi inteligent, unlikely from the posts you have written, but we do not care about you any more and possibly much less then ur so called "master" another thing that is bothering me. u say u r "fucking pissed at him" yet u still call him "the master" if ur so pissed at him why dont u call him or my collar/owner. i dont really understand WHY u would have to call any one "master" or "mistress" sure its nice but.. not nessacery.. not in my world anyway.. any one have any thoughts on this or any ideas to "set me stright"? ending rant before i scream. H >:)

Vanatru -> RE: Ok. This might just be the limit. (10/27/2007 7:24:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aceton ...To me, he seems like an assclown. ... Ass clown? do I even wanna know where the red nose goes? nevermind, the mental image only gets more disturbing. lol

Page: << < prev 6 7 8 [9] 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875