Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Safe words


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Safe words Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 3:15:00 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
Before you get too far afoot from the issues being discussed....
  • You and beth are driving along one fine sunny California morning and about to pass an intersection.  Although you're driving, you fail to notice the car approaching from the side and obviously about to run the red light and t-bone your car.  But beth sees it clearly.  Does beth yell "STOP!!" to you as you enter the intersection, or does she keep her mouth shut because she's not the one in control and should not be giving you orders?  Or does it depend upon which side of the car is going to be hit? 
  • You've just finished a wonderful dinner that beth cooked, and sit down in your favorite chair to relax.  As you're about to light a cigar, beth notices the odor of gas and realizes that the gas starter on the fireplace has been left on.  Does she yell "STOP!!" before you light the match, or does she keep her mouth shut because she's not the one in control and should not be giving you orders?  Or does it depend upon the value of your life insurance policy? 
  • You're headed to work one morning and beth, being the loving girl that she is, walks you out to the car and kisses you through the open driver's side window.  As you shift the car into reverse and look over your shoulder to back out of the driveway, beth notices that your child is sitting behind the car playing jacks, too low for you to see through the back window.  Does she yell "STOP!!" before you run over your child, or does she keep her mouth shut because she's not the one in control and should not be giving you orders?  Or does it depend upon whether your answer is hypothetical and theoretical?

And logically, how do any of those examples differ from saying "stop" during a scene, where you have stated categorically that would give control to the bottom?
  • The weatherman issues a tornado warning in the middle of the scene, and the Dominant/Top stops to assess the danger.  Does that mean all weathermen are now in charge of scenes?  No, the Dominant/Top was simply presented with some additional information which he processed and assessed. 
  • The cat rubs against one of the candles in the scene, lighting itself like a torch and begins running around the room.  The Dominant/Top stops to douse the smoldering remains of fluffy.  Does that mean that all cats are now in charge of scenes?  No, the Dominant/Top was simply prsented with some additional information which he processed, assessed, and decided to act upon. 
  • Little Timmy, Jr. can be heard opening the door to the bedroom in the middle of his parent's scene and shouts "Stop!!" as he sees daddy whipping mommy.  The Dominant/Top stops to put little Timmy, Jr. back to bed and then lock his own door upon return to the bedroom.  Does that mean that all children are now in charge of scenes?  No, the Dominant/Top was simply presented with some additional information which he processed, assessed, and decided to act upon. 
  • In the middle of their scene, the bottom conveys that a problem exists, in that the chains have become bound and are pinching her skin so tightly that the excruciating (and "bad") pain is preventing her from achieving her Master's desired state of mind.  Does that mean that the submissive/bottom is in charge?  No, the Dominant/Top was simply presented with some additional information which he processed, assessed, and decided to act upon.

How do any of those examples differ from a Top receiving information during a scene that causes him to pause, process the information, assess the various potential courses of action, and then decide if and how to act upon it? 
 
You're being inconsistent, Merc.  And doing anything you can to obfuscate, deflect and and sidetrack the discussion in hopes that you won't be seen as being hopelessly entangled in the logical pretzel in which you've tied yourself.  The bottom line is that you want to be seen as being *more* in control than others by not responding to your bottom during a scene, but not any *less* in control when you respond to her in exactly the same way throughout the course of life. 
 
Of course, if your control is limited to the bedroom....
 
John
 

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 3:19:25 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Your position then is safe-words are great when used correctly and dangerous when they are used incorrectly. The bottom line then is; don't rely on them, and don't think you are safe using them. That's been my position from the first post.


If you want to be safe, join a spelling bee. I am a risk taker. I would jump out of a plane with a parachute packed by my Daddy if he said it was reliable, because I trust him. Just like I trust him to do all that he can as not to harm me. I do not think anyone is safe at any moment of the day... I could have a plane fly into the room right as I type this... life is scary, unsafe, and no one gets out alive. What this has to do with a code between two people to communicate a concept is beyond me

quote:

I guess the person is an "idiot" then in your mind. I don't assign those names to someone who didn't hear. It happened - I say it can happen and does versus calling the occurrence an example of idiocy. I can live with that difference in our interpretation of that person's experience



I would not want to play with a person that was not picking up on every clue and cue possible as to my welfare and then dismissed not knowing I was ok because of a safeword left unheard... safewords are one way to communicate a concept. We do not rely completely on words to communicate in any aspect of life... we pick up on body language and facial expressions, in addition to tone of voice when interpreting what the words uttered say. All of these things are used in communication (learned that one in college). Yes, I would have a problem with someone that relied on only a safeword, just like I would have a problem with someone that only relied on safety belts and drove like a maniac.

quote:

I would represent that my ability to discern a "hysterical" scream from beth is contingent upon never having heard one. I won't attempt to try and provide proof of a negative. However, I'm confident, and more importantly beth is confident that the condition you describe will not take place. Further, I'd have the opinion that it would be much more likely to occur WITH a safe-word.




My point was taken from your examples, what would you do if she screamed hysterically? I suppose some people cannot put themselves into a position that they have never experienced... perhaps a lack of empathy or imagination on your part prohibits you from giving me anything but a throw away answer or non answer to the question that I asked sincerely of you.

I have never screamed hysterically during play either, but I never is a very long time.... I mean we could be in the forest and I could be tied to a tree, and a rattlesnake could be coiled up a few feet away. I could be on the bed and an intruder could be behind him with a gun... it is not only his behavior that could make me scream hysterically... it could be something within me or something else in the environment.  I am very imaginative though... I suppose it is entertaining for me to have discourse with people who speak in absolutes without even one attempt to think of a universe in which what they say is impossible actually comes to pass.

quote:

You'll have to take that up with the people who gave the examples. I wouldn't be so callous and assuming that their dom "didn't give a shit about" them.



I did not read the original examples, have no desire to, and I was only reading the examples as you posted them... and I qualified it with one reason being inexperienced.... are you telling me that you believe someone that only relied on safewords as being experienced? I thought your contention was that inexperienced people are dangerous when overly relying on safewords.

quote:

Apparently you applied another's position to me. I've ended many of my comments with the sentiment that if they work for you "use and enjoy" your safe-word. I didn't try to convert anyone, although at least one person indicated that they were converted. I hope it works out for them as much as I hope that the people who use safe-words don't have similar or worse experiences as those related.



Opps, it was in your insistence that those who use a safeword are actually dominants that you are militant about... my bad. Not that I care if anyone perceives me as a dominant as long as I am happy in my life... which I am.

quote:

Why is there a need for me to acknowledge anything about anyone else's method of communication? I didn't think anyone required validation, from me of all people


Watching you discuss with Rover makes me think that you have not read anyone on this thread with anything approaching an open mind, and instead you seemingly just discount others as being "emotional" instead of addressing the substance of what they are trying to convey to you... I do not care what you think, Merc, it has no meaning for me, but after all the effort to inform you about something that you seem entirely ignorant about (how to effectively communicate with the use of safewords) I would think you would acknowledge at the very least people just perceive the world differently than you... neither one right nor wrong. People can communicate with codes and not take the power from a dominant... over and over again I saw Rover try to reasonably express this concept to you, and yet you were unwilling to even for one minute state that perhaps you had not looked at all the angles of this debate. I can say, using my intellectual honesty, that some bottom types could use safewords to control a scene... but words of all types can be used to control and manipulate a dominant... not just safewords. Words are tools to communicate concepts that exist within us, the context of their use determines what meaning they have.

quote:

Yes it is my belief that they are dangerous for all the reasons, examples, and potential situations that I gave. What's your problem with that? It's not like I created any BDSM law that you, or anyone else, has to follow


I have no problem with it, Merc, none whatsoever. Keep on keeping on. Don't use them. I will continue to learn from others how they experience the world in which they live in. I have a lot to learn in life, and will until I die. I am so glad that I am not so adamant that my worldview is the only one worth having or listening to. I have changed my mind about safeword use since I began seeing my Daddy, it has changed due to my own personal experiences, because I have not always been able to use it and had to rely on the fact he WAS paying attention to what the hell he was doing. I know that sometimes submissives cannot be relied on to be able to vocalize their safewords... but that does not mean that they never can.



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 3:47:36 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
John,
I thought you were out enjoying your cigar and celebrating with your "class"?

I'm entangled in nothing. My relationship is 24/7 has no safe-words and the dominance within it comes from me and me alone. I belief having safe-words in play during a scene can create a dangerous environment. I belief that a dominant who gives or requires a safe word shirks some if not all of their responsibility for the safety and well being of the submissive. I belief that a submissive having the ability to use a safe-word has the ability to stop what is happening. I belief the stopping, under the power of the use of a safe-word gives dominance to the submission. Those are my beliefs. They are active, consistent, and acted upon without doubt or hesitation by the only person it matters - the woman who is my slave.

If my position gives you the impression that I am in "*more* in control than others" I'm flattered, but that perspective comes from you.

I don't know why you are struggling with yours to the point of feeling the need to convert me to them. 

Since they apparently are so important to you; the rhetorical examples you give involving beth have no relevance to the discussion. beth isn't required to agree with me, or have the same beliefs as I do for that matter. her one requirement is to obey and act upon what I want regardless of those differences. she follows that requirement to the letter.

One of beth's requirements is that she die before me. So in example #1 her yelling "stop" may be contingent upon what side we were about to get t-boned. However since she is also responsible for protecting ALL my property, which includes herself. Saying "stop" would not be in conflict of my dominance. However, more than likely she'd say "SHIT - Look out!, or just "FUCK!" Is your point that if she said "RED" I'd know exactly what she was talking about stop and both our lives would be saved!

The same can be applied to all your examples, although a child on my property would have had to break in through a gate and fence, he/she would still cost me personal property of some sort and it would be beth's responsibility to protect me from that loss.

However, what did that disclose?

Why this was critical is beyond me. I thought the examples rhetorical and didn't form the cornerstone of your argument. Sorry for ignoring them. I wouldn't have if I knew that was an important lesson for your class.

I've always said that the written word is second only to the spoken word over a telephone as the least effective manner of communication. This discussion is additional proof of that fact.

As to the other examples you provide, the do not involve the submissive making them irrelevant to a discussion of a submissive using a safe-word.

Again, if you care to witness it in action I suggest you take me up on my invitation to visit. Bring your class and I'll provide the cigars and brandy.  

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 3:53:58 PM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Status: offline
Rover none of those situations you described are analogous to a safeword.

From what I have always been told the point of a safeword (code red, not code yellow) is to end play immediately.  When two people agree to use a safeword they are agreeing when this word is spoken the Top will stop instantly.  Obviously he might be a sociopathic creep who doesn't adhere to the safeword, but the point is that IF safewords are used correctly they are a command that MUST be followed.

Of course I can command my Master.  I can say "Stop there's a squirrel in the road!" which is a command.  But according to the paradigm of our relationship he doesn't HAVE to stop.  We never agreed "if I say squirrel you stop the car" - I'm commanding him yes, but it's not obligatory for him to listen. Christ I could also command him to make me breakfast in bed and give me a foot rub - but just because I command it doesn't mean he's going to do it. 

The only way you could compare any of those situations you listed to a safe word is if you defined a safe word as something that a Top/Master/Dominant may or may not stop for, depending on if he wants to.  I'm sorry but if I'm at a play party screaming 'red' and my Master doesn't stop, I don't think the host will be very happy if his excuse is "well a safe word just means she wants me to stop it doesn't mean I *have* to stop."

Even if I say to him "Stop there's an old man in the street" he still doesn't HAVE to listen.  He might not stop - he might swerve instead.  Or honk.  Or he might stop.  But if he did, it would still be his choice.

< Message edited by xoxi -- 11/13/2007 3:56:20 PM >

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 4:45:30 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

I'm entangled in nothing. My relationship is 24/7 has no safe-words and the dominance within it comes from me and me alone. I belief having safe-words in play during a scene can create a dangerous environment. I belief that a dominant who gives or requires a safe word shirks some if not all of their responsibility for the safety and well being of the submissive. I belief that a submissive having the ability to use a safe-word has the ability to stop what is happening. I belief the stopping, under the power of the use of a safe-word gives dominance to the submission. Those are my beliefs. They are active, consistent, and acted upon without doubt or hesitation by the only person it matters - the woman who is my slave.


Using that same logic in a consistent manner....
  • You and beth are driving along one fine sunny California morning and about to pass an intersection.  Although you're driving, you fail to notice the car approaching from the side and obviously about to run the red light and t-bone your car.  But beth sees it clearly.  Beth yells "STOP" (or "Red" if you prefer) as you enter the intersection (because it is her door about to be hit) giving dominance to her and making you submissive to her direction.   
  • You've just finished a wonderful dinner that beth cooked, and sit down in your favorite chair to relax.  As you're about to light a cigar, beth notices the odor of gas and realizes that the gas starter on the fireplace has been left on.  Beth yells "STOP!!" (or "Red" if you prefer) before you light the match (because you are insufficiently insured) giving dominance to her and making you submissive to her direction.
  • You're headed to work one morning and beth, being the loving girl that she is, walks you out to the car and kisses you through the open driver's side window.  As you shift the car into reverse and look over your shoulder to back out of the driveway, beth notices that your child is sitting behind the car playing jacks, too low for you to see through the back window.  Beth yells "STOP!!" (or "Red" if you prefer) before you run over your child giving dominance to her and making you submissive to her direction (and because she knows that, practically speaking, our decisions in life have quite a few more consequences than theoretical questions on a bulletin board). 

They are, evidently your beliefs applied consistently... a submissive using a safeword to stop what is happening. 
 
Something else to be considered is the element of trust.  You've made mention several times of the trust a bottom/submissive/slave "should" (a relative assertion) have in their Top/Dominant.  But trust is a two-way street.  Don't you trust beth to give you imperative information that demands your immediate attention, and not bother you with "my nose itches"? 
 
John
 
P.S. - I might enjoy that cigar with you, though I'll pass on the brandy (I don't drink alcohol).

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 4:50:24 PM   
ItalianSMistress


Posts: 427
Joined: 1/19/2007
From: Niagara Region Ontario Canada
Status: offline
I have never used safe words, My thought always was that if I dont know when that slave has had enough, I most likely should not be playing with them

_____________________________

Governess

"Dominance is the ability to create a hunger in someone that's so strong they will do anything, anytime, anywhere just to please you."


http://italianmistress.livejournal.com/


(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 5:00:29 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xoxi

Rover none of those situations you described are analogous to a safeword.


I respectfully disagree.

quote:


From what I have always been told the point of a safeword (code red, not code yellow) is to end play immediately. 


If that's what they agree upon, then that's the case.  If they agree upon something different (for instance... it means something requires your immediate attention) then that's what it means.  Like everything else, it means whatever the two people in the relationship agree that it means.  You can't define it for everyone.

quote:


When two people agree to use a safeword they are agreeing when this word is spoken the Top will stop instantly. 


No, they are agreeing that it means whatever they have agreed that it means. 

quote:


Obviously he might be a sociopathic creep who doesn't adhere to the safeword, but the point is that IF safewords are used correctly they are a command that MUST be followed.


And here's the "one twue way" again... who says that there is only one correct way to use safewords?  One correct way... one twue way... get it?  A safeword means whatever the partners agree that it means.  Neither you, nor I, nor anyone else determines the "one twue way" that safewords can be used, or the "one twue meaning" of them.

quote:


Of course I can command my Master.  I can say "Stop there's a squirrel in the road!" which is a command.  But according to the paradigm of our relationship he doesn't HAVE to stop.  We never agreed "if I say squirrel you stop the car" - I'm commanding him yes, but it's not obligatory for him to listen. Christ I could also command him to make me breakfast in bed and give me a foot rub - but just because I command it doesn't mean he's going to do it. 


Precisely!!  Operative words... you "never agreed" what the meaning of that term is to be between you.  And he is only obligated to respond as he determines the situation warrants.  Same with a safeword where "Red" means "something requires your immediate attention".  I find out what it is and determine whether I need to do about it.  I'm not obligated to stop, and she may not even want me to stop (simply to be aware of something critical).  It's communication, plain and simple.

quote:


The only way you could compare any of those situations you listed to a safe word is if you defined a safe word as something that a Top/Master/Dominant may or may not stop for, depending on if he wants to. 


Yep, that's how I'm defining a safeword.  Please tell me that I'm wrong because I'm violating the "one twue way".

quote:


I'm sorry but if I'm at a play party screaming 'red' and my Master doesn't stop, I don't think the host will be very happy if his excuse is "well a safe word just means she wants me to stop it doesn't mean I *have* to stop."


Now you're talking about something entirely different.  At a play party, dungeon, etc. you're a guest that is obligated to play within whatever rules the host requires in order to play at that venue.  Don't like the rules?  Don't play there.  No one will tell you that you're "wrong" to play by your own rules in the privacy of your own home (well, you and Merc might be the exception). 

If you want to make it a control issue, then the host is now in control... not the bottom/submissive/slave or the Dominant/Top.  It's the host's rules.

quote:


Even if I say to him "Stop there's an old man in the street" he still doesn't HAVE to listen.  He might not stop - he might swerve instead.  Or honk.  Or he might stop.  But if he did, it would still be his choice.


Yep, that's right.  Just as it would be his choice to decide what to do if you agree that "Red" means "something requires your immediate attention".  This really isn't all that difficult to understand unless you simply don't want to understand.
 
John

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to xoxi)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 6:07:00 PM   
phedre81


Posts: 56
Joined: 10/29/2007
Status: offline
What I'm still confused on, is if you're using a safe word to mean something other than that the Top must stop immediately, what's the difference between using the safe word to communicate, and using another phrase (ie, Master, my knee is dislocated)

It seems like if the Top is paying attention, "ow, ow, OW!" is quite different from "WAIT, STOP, my KNEE" which, as has been pointed out, is far more communicative than "Red."

I can see safewords as being helpful for people who are not that familiar with one another yet--in this way, when they are used as a command to stop all play immediately, I DO see them as giving the bottom a means of retaining a measure of control.

What I don't understand is, if using them the other way--not as a command to stop, but as a way to say, "Hey, I have information" why use a "safeword" at all--why not just give the information?

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 6:11:51 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phedre81

What I'm still confused on, is if you're using a safe word to mean something other than that the Top must stop immediately, what's the difference between using the safe word to communicate, and using another phrase (ie, Master, my knee is dislocated)

It seems like if the Top is paying attention, "ow, ow, OW!" is quite different from "WAIT, STOP, my KNEE" which, as has been pointed out, is far more communicative than "Red."

I can see safewords as being helpful for people who are not that familiar with one another yet--in this way, when they are used as a command to stop all play immediately, I DO see them as giving the bottom a means of retaining a measure of control.

What I don't understand is, if using them the other way--not as a command to stop, but as a way to say, "Hey, I have information" why use a "safeword" at all--why not just give the information?


If a couple is doing a forced sex role play or interrogation play, any other phrase or word maybe confused with the real intention of the bottom in question. A code word that tells the dominant that what the bottom is saying is not about the scene, but instead is a real need to stop and be evaluated, could be very helpful and necessary for certain types of play.

When I fly I can get into a disassociated state to some extent, where it is hard to state what I am thinking coherently. "Red" is a lot easier to say quickly than entire sentences or paragraphs. Once he can stop what he is doing, assess the situation, he can decide what needs to be done to continue or if he wants to continue.... I do not see that as hard to understand

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to phedre81)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 6:20:59 PM   
phedre81


Posts: 56
Joined: 10/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
If a couple is doing a forced sex role play or interrogation play, any other phrase or word maybe confused with the real intention of the bottom in question. A code word that tells the dominant that what the bottom is saying is not about the scene, but instead is a real need to stop and be evaluated, could be very helpful and necessary for certain types of play.

When I fly I can get into a disassociated state to some extent, where it is hard to state what I am thinking coherently. "Red" is a lot easier to say quickly than entire sentences or paragraphs. Once he can stop what he is doing, assess the situation, he can decide what needs to be done to continue or if he wants to continue.... I do not see that as hard to understand


I can see why it's not hard for you to understand, but I appreciate you taking the time to explain it to me--I know it's been mentioned in this thread already, but some of the different ideas have gotten a little mixed up for me at this point. ;)

So, in your case, does a safe word NOT mean that the Top is immediately required to stop?  Is your safe word simply a word that has been agreed upon that means "wait, I have information" that you find easier to say than a sentence, or that is more easily understood and clear than a sentence which might be misinterpreted?

Thanks!

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 6:49:01 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
I consider a safeword as something not to be abused. It is a form of communication that I take very seriously and to me it means that I am being damaged in some way. If he ignored me saying it I would be even more damaged by that. To us "red" means he stops and assesses my condition immediately. It is like paramedics telling the ER officials that someone is "code blue".

What happened the one occasion I uttered "red" is that he stopped, untied me and carried me to the bed and checked my eyes and my pulse, felt my skin. He also asked me questions about my neck before he even untied me, and I vaguely remember him running his fingers over my neck. Basically it was his cue to make sure I was ok. I had trouble even saying red, and I remember trying to decide if I should, and decided to do so because I did not want to vomit.

After he checked me he decided that play was over for the day...

Our relationship has deepened quite a lot since then, I love him dearly, and trust him  deeply. No matter what has ever happened between us, I have never doubted that we were very bonded by the S amd M part of our relationship and he would never knowingly harm me. I do not expect that I would never be harmed by our play, I know it is a very real possibility that I could be... there is no safe way to do a dangerous thing. My masochism is a spiritual thing to me, it is tantric for us. I choose to engage in this play and a D/s relationship knowing that there are risks. I find it odd that anyone would state beyond a shadow of a doubt that they would never injure a masochist, because injuries can occur anywhere, anytime doing things much less dangerous... bruising someone can lead to permanent injury as blood clots can form and this can cause strokes or heart attacks... rare, but it can happen... Going to the gym is less dangerous than S&M, yet I know I can injure myself doing that as well.

Safewords are not my way of controlling the scene. When I am in flight the last thing I am thinking about is stopping what he does, I just revel in the sensations. If I suddenly had to stop, it would be because of physical limitations... all of us have them. I will probably never need my safeword again, but it is there if I do. If I say it, he would do what he has promised he would do, which is to stop, assess, get help if necessary, or correct the situation and continue... he is the one in control over me and his faculties.. he would be the one that decides.

My Daddy teaches self defense. He paid for me to take a workshop there. I learned the process that they teach people in an emergency situation. You stop, look, assess, and get help.... that is what "red" means. It does not mean he cannot continue if he deems it is ok to continue.. that choice is ultimately his, and I trust him completely to make that choice because he has demonstrated as a sadist he can be trusted completely.


We play rough sometimes. I am a masochist, I like to be beaten. Perhaps other people do not play hard with each other and would never have occasion to be damaged in play, but some of the things that we may do in the future could be dangerous to me.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to phedre81)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 7:34:19 PM   
phedre81


Posts: 56
Joined: 10/29/2007
Status: offline
Thanks so much for taking the time to give detail about how a safeword works for you!

I appreciate your points, and you've given me a lot to think about, particularly how a safeword doesn't make you be in control of the situation, and the way it is used as communication between the two of you.

Again, thanks!

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 7:36:23 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phedre81

What I'm still confused on, is if you're using a safe word to mean something other than that the Top must stop immediately, what's the difference between using the safe word to communicate, and using another phrase (ie, Master, my knee is dislocated)


There's no difference at all.  The only reason safewords came into being was to eliminate confusion when plainly spoken English (such as "stop") might be part of the scene (as would be the case in scenes that mimick non-consent, like rape scenes).

quote:


It seems like if the Top is paying attention, "ow, ow, OW!" is quite different from "WAIT, STOP, my KNEE" which, as has been pointed out, is far more communicative than "Red."


Whatever works for you.  The net result is the same.  I have a friend who swears that "explosive diarrhea" is the most effective safeword for her... it has never failed to cause a Top to take immediate note of whatever critical information she has to share.

quote:


I can see safewords as being helpful for people who are not that familiar with one another yet--in this way, when they are used as a command to stop all play immediately, I DO see them as giving the bottom a means of retaining a measure of control.


To begin, I believe you're quite correct about the value of safewords amongst people who do not yet know one another intimately.  And that describes a great many of the folks in BDSM, for whom play is separate from any ongoing relationship (ie: it's sensation play alone). 
 
Beyond that, if you feel that the bottom gets control when you use them, then that's probably true for you.  But it's not true for everyone, and many folks employ the use of safewords without any loss of Top control.  So, what do you use during scenes that mimick non-consent, such as rape scenes?

quote:


What I don't understand is, if using them the other way--not as a command to stop, but as a way to say, "Hey, I have information" why use a "safeword" at all--why not just give the information?


As I've mentioned previously, safewords came into fashion in order to have clear communication during scenes that mimick non-consent, such as rape scenes, when "Stop" or "Wait" or "No" or various types of pleading might be construed as part of the scene itself.  Their use in public venues such as dungeons, clubs, etc. is so that everyone is on the same page, and the Dungeon Monitors can provide adequate supervision.
 
John

< Message edited by Rover -- 11/13/2007 7:39:36 PM >


_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to phedre81)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 7:45:56 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phedre81

Thanks so much for taking the time to give detail about how a safeword works for you!

I appreciate your points, and you've given me a lot to think about, particularly how a safeword doesn't make you be in control of the situation, and the way it is used as communication between the two of you.

Again, thanks!


I appreciate your open mindedness.. it is rather refreshing.

I wanted to add, because I am a masochist I do not feel like I am "submitting" to being beaten. I want to be. It is a reward for being good. Because I am not submitting to pain play, I cannot conceive of "stopping" the scene as a form of dominating him. Just the fact he is in control over whether or not I get what I want is the part of S&M that I am submitting to. My submission in relation to my masochism comes in the form of not demanding he hit me, but waiting for him to want to hit me.... I want him to want to give me pain. I do not ask for it, and that is my submissiveness coming through. I am so happy when he wants to play that way with me I would never dream of stopping it unless I was being truly damaged. I have even cried before uttering a safeword, because I would rather cry than stop him unless I was in immediate danger... my tears ended up stopping him, but only because he wanted to stop. I suppose someone could say that by crying I "dominated" him.. (laughing at that).

I have no preconceived ideas of what he should do with me when we play, I just hand myself over and allow whatever comes and live in the moment of it all... and that is where the bond comes in, that is the spiritual part of it...who could feel that and want to stop it? Not me!

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to phedre81)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 8:01:47 PM   
phedre81


Posts: 56
Joined: 10/29/2007
Status: offline
Well, I'm new, both to the "scene" and to this site--no one could be more aware than I am of how much I have to learn!

I think your example with the tears makes an excellent point--an action that causes the Top to CHOOSE to stop, is not necessarily controlling the Top or making him stop.

I enjoy the feeling of helplessness and vulnerability that comes when another person is causing me pain.  As a new Bottom, I DO tend to use safe words, b/c I haven't played with anyone who knows me well enough to KNOW they aren't damaging me, emotionally or physically with the level of pain they're causing.

I just also know that with my current partner, a firm "STOP, I need a second" would work just as well.

But, clearly, there are scenarios which I have not yet taken part in, in which "STOP, I need a second" might just as easily be laughed at an ignored.

I think the conclusion I'm coming to is simply that safe words have a place.  Not necessarily in every relationship or interaction, but a valid place nonetheless.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 10:47:27 PM   
Ecossaise


Posts: 34
Joined: 11/13/2007
Status: offline
What a long and interesting discussion.

To return to the beginning: "Pax". If absolutely necessary.

We all like to pride ourselves that our safe words are never, or hardly ever, used. No matter how good a Mistress I am, I am only human and therefore (gasp) fallible. I allow my girl, who is only human too, a way of communicating while things are "on pause" so to speak. I regard it as a point of honour to do so.

(in reply to phedre81)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 10:58:33 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

I think your example with the tears makes an excellent point--an action that causes the Top to CHOOSE to stop, is not necessarily controlling the Top or making him stop.


When I talked to my Daddy about this thread, that was pretty much what he said... he did not have to stop, he only stopped because he wanted to.


quote:

I enjoy the feeling of helplessness and vulnerability that comes when another person is causing me pain.  As a new Bottom, I DO tend to use safe words, b/c I haven't played with anyone who knows me well enough to KNOW they aren't damaging me, emotionally or physically with the level of pain they're causing.


My first dominant trained me to tell him the intensity I was feeling by using the color system, so it is something that I learned from the get-go... although my Daddy has never used this system to gauge my feelings in relationship to pain.

I think my first dominant was unsure of exactly how masochistic I was... I did not know myself. I am still not sure how masochistic I am because I have never explored the edge to be honest...

I can understand the use of safewords until you know how you respond to play. I will say that not only is every dominant different to play with, but every time I play it is different. My pain threshold is not a constant, nor does he play with me exactly the same way every time.....

quote:

I just also know that with my current partner, a firm "STOP, I need a second" would work just as well.

But, clearly, there are scenarios which I have not yet taken part in, in which "STOP, I need a second" might just as easily be laughed at an ignored.



That works pretty well for us too, and I will usually say things like "I need to move my hip" if I am uncomfortable, and he usually helps me shift if I need to move... but sometimes he doesn't allow me to move even though I have complained that my hair is keeping me from moving, or I cannot breathe with my face buried in a pillow... unless I call red he can and does decide whether I should be uncomfortable or not. Being uncomfortable does not equal  calling colors. In fact I get turned on when he ignores my discomfort. So directly communicating an issue will not necessarily mean anything will change... and we both enjoy that sort of play.


quote:

I think the conclusion I'm coming to is simply that safe words have a place.  Not necessarily in every relationship or interaction, but a valid place nonetheless.


That is a pretty fair minded conclusion, and I share your opinion.



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to phedre81)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Safe words - 11/13/2007 11:05:32 PM   
Shawn1066


Posts: 987
Joined: 10/7/2007
Status: offline
My Owner and I do not have a safeword, and this is truly in my best interest.  I know that I'd be too stubborn to use one if I had one, which is a personal failing.  I'd get in over my head, but I'd refuse to admit it.  I trust her to know when to stop, and she's never disappointed me in that regards.  It's her right and her responsibility, after all.  If, for whatever, reason, I felt a need to stop...I would ask her to stop.  She would allow me that.

Also.  I'm very quiet in scene(normally quite the chatterbox), aside from whimpers and an occasional yelp.  I can never find words.  I never have the power to say them.  I'm speechless.  When I'm caught up in the moment, my thinking also has a tendency to drift away.  If I -had- a safeword, I'd probably not be able to use it properly.

So, thankfully she's good enough at what she does that she knows when to stop.  She knows when I'm in over my head well before I do.

(in reply to Ecossaise)
Profile   Post #: 198
What are words for? - 11/13/2007 11:19:32 PM   
ThomasMore


Posts: 52
Joined: 9/25/2007
Status: offline
Either "trousellbarf" or "antidisestablishmentarianism", depending.

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: What are words for? - 11/14/2007 7:47:52 AM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Status: offline
Rover,

I guess your post makes more sense then.  I wasn't saying there was only one true way to use a safeword - I'm saying that as far as I was aware that was the definition of a safeword as used in every BDSM community I've been exposed to.  In every public party or open dungeon.  Everywhere.

Obviously people can make their own definitions of words up - FFS I can say that by *my* definition I'm a Master because I'm really good at what I do as a slave.  But that might make things confusing when I post things like "As a Master, I find it arousing to kiss my owner's feet.  I feel that any Master should do so if their owner requires it."  And then write five pages about how I'm a Master of servitude and how if anyone says they've never heard any female slave call themselves "Master" they were imposing their one true way on me.

Or I could not do that because it's really ridiculous and impedes rational discussion.

The posts I made are valid in the context of safeword=stop.  If you see a safeword as just another word that may or may not be obeyed we have a different definition of the word, so nothing you say about safewords will make a bit of sense to me and nothing I say about them will make a bit of sense to you.  It's not saying "there is only one true way" to try to agree on the terms discussed before discussing them.

Either way I agree completely - if a safeword is just something the Dominant can fuck off and ignore or follow at his own leisure, then no the submissive isn't the one in control there.  But then, really now, what's the point of having one?

(in reply to ThomasMore)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Safe words Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094