domtimothy46176
Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004 From: Dayton, Ohio area Status: offline
|
"So now a husband is analagous to property? Who are you to say that my wife has a "prior claim" to my attention. I give my attention to whomever I choose. If my wife wants my attention, she needs to earn it, and if she isn't earning it, it will wander. Even in relationships where a couple has taken a vow of monogamy (i never did), they don't vow to give one another 100% or their attention. But then again, I have nothing against receiving stolen property." You are entirely free to engage in whatever illegal activity you find appropriate. You're willingness to operate outside the law, however, does not change the law nor does it alter the underlying ethical basis for the rule of law and it most certainly will make give you immunity from facing the consequences of breaking the law. Regardless of those laws we disagree with, we break them at our own peril. Personally, I operate within the law because I find my liberty to be worth much more than what I can save buying a television set that's stolen rather than paying full retail price. That is, however, a personal judgement. In much the same way, one can choose to be a liar and a cheat and suffer the consequences for those behaviors. It remains a personal judgement each is free to make within their own lives. One point of correction, however. I would suggest that a vow of monogamy would preclude one partner dancing, kissing and "fooling around" with someone other than the SO, by definition. Perhaps we define monogamy differently, but I think that monogamy is generally understood to mean physical and romantic fidelity. Within the context of the quote from my post, the discussion specifically revolved around knowingly dating a married person while declining to accept culpability for the repercussions of that decision. I did not suggest that either husbands or wives were commodities. I also did not express an opinion of any kind about you personally or your specific obligations to your spouse. Your specific marriage and your obligations within it were not referenced in my post and are not relevant. Timothy
< Message edited by domtimothy46176 -- 8/18/2005 12:45:29 PM >
|