Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
Damn - Check out day in Vegas - Another GREAT trip hi-lighted by a visit to Lady C, owner, proprietor of the wonderful store, 'Lady C Leather' on West Sahara . Although having beth fitted for a new set of cuffs wasn't as much fun as fitting her for the harness we purchased when last we visited, it was still great to see her and W - the on site 'tailor'. She's expanded her store and its filled with great stuff. Best of all - while you wait you can have your 'off the rack' selection custom fitted. It is a wonderful experience to go to her shop. A leather store owned and operated by people who are active in the community. We highly recommend a visit if you're in the neighborhood. But back to the question at hand... quote:
My master would like me to do it and I don't feel like it's still me talking, like I can't truely express myself honestly and emotionally in this manner... Any thoughts to that as well? kitty, My thought is basic and should be the first thought anyone has when giving or receiving an order or request whether from a dominant or Master - WHY? Heresy? Questioning a Master? Disrespectful? You mean as opposed to questioning him/her on an open forum? If the answer makes sense to you and the relationship you have or want to have, then by all means comply. If its requested, and you get a response "because I said so!"; you're back to square one regarding issues of trust and/or confidence. There could be a very basic goal or focus and/or commitment. There was a point made a few pages back about "slipping" and using this form of communication. Well, I guess its always a possibility, but in the 5 years that beth's been required to do so, she hasn't slipped once to my knowledge, or at least has never "slipped" and been pointed at and ridiculed. That's usually a tactic taken by the one handed web-surfer crowd; whom I'm sure would "vomit" witnessing many other activities that we engage in regularly. If it bothers you, or your submission requires universal validation and acceptance, submit privately and not in a public forum. The practice of 3rd person speech requires focus and commitment. Obviously its not for everyone and shouldn't be considered a benchmark of any hierarchy of submission or slavery. As part of our 24/7 dynamic it serves a purpose. As an isolated aspect of a relationship it doesn't provide any insight. I've said that 24/7 isn't 24/7 physical intercourse. You can take that literally or figuratively. It is 24/7 'foreplay' interrupted by physical recovery from the 'intercourse' of all manner and sort. One of the purposes of third person speech with us is pointed to constant undercurrent generating a desired mental and emotional dynamic. It required, and requires, beth to have represent as my submissive. Hearing her is a constant reference to our commitment to each other. It serves our dynamic very nicely. But it has to make sense for YOU and be part of your relationship goal. Without that, its nothing more than the shallow, silly tactic to imply a dominance or submission that doesn't match the rest of the picture being presented; as others have stated representing their beliefs. Their opinion, like ours, should be respected and considered. Whether its origin was from the 'Old Guard', 'Gor', or part of the 'collard slave ritual' initiation of the Royal Ancient Order of the Swiss Chard doesn't matter. Its a tool which results in the submissive to think and focus prior to communicating. Its a shame that a similar, easy to use, tool isn't as readily available for the dominant side of the flogger. Good luck! We can see Maria del Rey from our place. Maybe we can speak more of this, and you can speak directly to beth regarding her feelings on the manner, in person at the next South Bay Munch group get together in Torrance?
< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 1/30/2008 8:13:09 AM >
|