Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveluci I see your point and I am just as sickened by any kind of animal abuse as anyone else here. Nobody is doubting that, I think. quote:
I just don't think that becoming bloodthirsty toward humans is really a balanced response. Balanced response? No. Emotionally valid response? Yes. This is one of the reasons we have courts of law and discourage vigilantism. I readily admit that my emotional response is one of contempt and attendant agression. But I have never advocated a society that will let that be the driving force of its justice system. quote:
It kind of reminds me of the whole abortion/death penalty thing. Which we shouldn't derail this thread with. My POV on those is quite internally consistent. That doesn't prevent this from eliciting a response. Which is part of the reason for my POV on those two. quote:
It has always amazed me that some people get so murderously angry over animal abuse but child abuse isn't quite their issue. Depends on your definition of those two terms. My views on both of those are, again, internally consistent and in line with my values and the most recent research in the fields. But we can't discuss either here on CM, so I can't even begin to outline what my thoughts are, or how they fit with everything else. Suffice to say, though, that I've taken steps in cases where I perceive abuse, regardless of the species of the victim. quote:
But I do have to admit that I feel compassion toward human beings should rank slightly higher than towards animals. That is your value judgment, which is your right. Mine is different, which is my right. I've not found cause to rank humans higher than animals, although I have found cause to rank specific individuals of whatever species higher than a species in general. As I've said in the past, my compassion and my ethics both encompass life, period. To start subdividing it has never worked for me; there's simply nothing to go by that wouldn't validate equally arbitrary grading of the value of human lives. quote:
But if people got as angry at the injustice, abuse, unfairness and just general "screwing over" many people get at the hands of the government, banks, society in general as they do about some neglected animals, maybe some real change could be effected. Or maybe they would just get numbed down. That's one proposed role for the media. quote:
I just see how things could have gotten so f'd up in their world that it led to this. As do I, having been in their situation 7 times in my 27 years of life, and having lost one pet because of it (circumstances were such that it was able to run away, scared by the commotion; I never found it again, although I've still got a reward posted for it, five years later). What I said, though, was simply that I view it no differently than any other situation where people lose their heads, and that it would not be viewed any differently by me if they forgot to bring their baby along. And in the specific cases mentioned in the OP's article, people had time to friggin' trash their apartments. If they expended a fraction of that time and energy on the pets, those would've been safe. Clearly, in this case, it's a matter of priorities, not temporary insanity. quote:
Not defending it, just seeing how it could occur. Hell, I can see how WWII could occur. After 9 years of trying to make up my mind as to how I feel about that whole mess, I still haven't come down firmly on one side or the other. I realize life is complicated, and I can see how a lot of really horrendous shit can happen. Where one draws the line is an individual matter. And I would say that the cases mentioned in the OP's article are clearly on the wrong side of that line, in my view. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|