spanklette
Posts: 882
Joined: 2/22/2005 Status: offline
|
I find collars of consideration easy to understand, and I'm not completely against the entire concept. Actually, I think a collar of consideration merges nicely with going steady in vanilla terms, or being engaged. I view it as kind of a test run...let's see if this is gonna work for us kind of thing. Collars of Protection are another story, though...I just don't see their place. In my experience, the one who is "protecting" is actually staking claim. People do their own things, and I think that's great. One of my favorite parts of the lifestyle is the pomp and circumstance, or the protocols, if you will. But, outside of a "House" collar of protection, I am either totally missing the point or way off base. I guess, in the end, it's whatever makes people happy. If someone feels a need for a collar of protection, then have at it. I may not understand the concept, but I'm not the one donning the collar. And, actually, I saw a real life use for a collar of consideration. A submissive moved in with a "family" and although she was happy with most of them, it became quickly apparent that things weren't going as planned. So, during the time she wore her collar of consideration, she was part of a closed poly household. After she took the time to consider it...she decided that the family didn't suit her needs. And, I think it turned out better than if she would have had some sort of formal collar or contract. Had she had either, someone would have ended up the bad guy, but this way it just flowed right past the drama. So, whatever floats your boat, I guess.
_____________________________
~spanklette~ "The important thing is this: to be able at any moment to sacrifice what we are for what we could become. " Charles du Bois "Please don't shout, can't you see I'm not listening." Billie Myers
|