Lumus
Posts: 5968
Joined: 9/16/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub The term "topping from the bottom" has become almost a boogieman at this point. Subs/slaves fear topping from the bottom to the point where they will let communication die lest any suggestion be seen as trying to have any control over the relationship whatsoever. Owners use the tactic to kill any idea or topic they don't want to talk about anymore, regardless of it's validity. The very use of the phrase by any potential owner would be a huge red flag for me. ? If you felt something was valid, would it still raise a red flag for you? I understood the viewpoint of your post until I got to the last part. Could you please clarify? To address the thread: I chatted with a switch who, at one point, decided to see if I would submit to her; she even said as much. Naturally, I didn't, and she got pissed off. As I told her: "Sorry, luv, but if you wanted to play with me you'd recognize the fact that I am a Dom, and those whom I wish to play with submit to me. I have no interest otherwise, and to attempt to force that is laughable. When a bottom tells me she wants to top, that's great - but it won't happen with me." Then she gave me some crap about how I'd really like it if I tried it, which set off the laughing spree that made her storm off. I'd say topping from the bottom does exist, and some might even enjoy it. I can't say I'd bash them for it, unless they tried to cross clearly-communicated lines and somehow expected to attain the goal which was contrary to said lines. That would [and has] bring out my sarcastic side.
_____________________________
<Talk to educate; listen to learn.> ~ the other half of "L&L" ~ I have been dubbed the Rainmaker. Do not make me take your water for my tribe.
|