Muttling
Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kittinSol The war was good for the weapons manufacturers, and they had to justify the defense budget. They've done more than that now, obviously, having slightly... exceeded their... line of credit, but anyway, it's been supah dupah and everybody's happy. Why do you ask? Are you a COMMUNIST? It was decent for the major weapons contractors at best. Colt, Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon, et. al. haven't done all that great from this. The niche players like the explosive ordnance disposal contractors (what I used to do) and the security contractors (e.g. Blackwater, Cochise, etc.) have made out like bandits. The big logistics outfits (e.g. Haliburton, Bechtel, KBR, etc) haven't done poorly by any stretch, but they haven't pulled in the insane proffits that the ordnance and security people have. Please note that I say proffits. The press wants to focus on overall dollars but they ignore the cost of the services provided. EDIT: Oh yeah.....The canine contractors are the ones with utterly STUPID margins on their services. Qualified working dogs are few and far between. There are less than 5 major outfits who can provide a significant number of canines that are up for the job and they know it. Bend over and take it doggy style.
< Message edited by Muttling -- 3/10/2008 4:12:08 AM >
|