Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Financial Domination


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Financial Domination Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Financial Domination - 7/16/2008 8:33:21 AM   
slavekal


Posts: 1486
Joined: 7/20/2004
Status: offline
I called Ms. Mlicious a whore on my blog.  But I meant it as a compliment.  I think she appreciated it.

(in reply to Briena)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Financial Domination - 7/16/2008 12:44:25 PM   
Misstoyou


Posts: 1149
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekal

I called Ms. Mlicious a whore on my blog. But I meant it as a compliment. I think she appreciated it.



I have no doubt that you would have known if she didn't. lol

_____________________________

~ Miss Marie

a.k.a. "mean Lady"


(in reply to slavekal)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Financial Domination - 7/16/2008 2:06:45 PM   
MistressSassy66


Posts: 1675
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

sinsersubm Why is it so hard to accept that Pros DO NOT have
>sex with Their "clients" they are not even allowed to
>masturbate.

It's not hard at all to accept that pros don't have sex etc with their client. Why is it so hard to accept that my point has never been linked to sex specifically?


I apologize for that comment as it was directed at usako.

The other part about you not likeing Pros the Financial
Dommes/scammers...I had addressed that issue in an earlier post.
So I again apologize for including you.
I'm definitely not perfect as you can see.

_____________________________

Mistress Sassy

http://www.mistresssassy.com

In the Immortal Words of Bob....Fuck the dumb shit.

"I love you not only for what you are,But for what I am when I'm with you."- Opening line from a poem by Roy Croft

(in reply to sinseresubm)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Financial Domination - 7/16/2008 8:49:52 PM   
SurrenderForMe


Posts: 229
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
And I mourn all the people who contact me and have nothing in common.  At least you can just move on.  I have to take the time with anyone who is not discourteous to type out a response. 

I don't seem to feel empathetic tonight, so sorry for not keeping it upbeat.  The reality is, financial domination, is both a fetish and a commercial enterprise.  Like scat (on the fetish side), if someone is into it and you're not, move to the next ad.  The majority of the people you encounter in life are not for you, for one reason or another.  It is why there are endless sites catering to people looking for someone. 

I have turned down several offers from men who wanted to make me a mistress in real terms, both online and face to face.  I do regret it when money is tight, not enough to follow up, but that wistful kind of regret.  I'd love to be treated like a queen, so far, that has not happened, but then, I'm a picky queen.

The upside is that you know that about those people up front.  The ones that hide it until you are entangled are the ones to be upset about.

Good luck

(in reply to sinseresubm)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Financial Domination - 9/17/2008 3:55:23 PM   
MaleSlaveAnon


Posts: 3
Joined: 9/14/2008
Status: offline
Seems this thread became about aspects of professional (fem) domination, its presence on this site, and who wouldn't use their services, so i'll weigh in on some of what i've read.

It was an interesting point someone made, about the insulted attitude of pro-dommes in their profiles about people contacting them on this dating site for dating, instead of apologizing for advertising commercial services only on a dating site.  It might help for them to open with something like "Commercial Services Only" in all caps to appears in the header quote so as not to waste the time of people looking for dating.  But I suspect they get more business by not doing that so people will read their ad and get interested and contact them anyway.  And if it is ok for them to try people out to see if they'll go for a commercial relationship with their ad in a dating venue, what's wrong with people trying them out to see if they'll go for a dating relationship with their responses, especially since this IS a dating venue?  (Personally, i'm fine with their presence, because they're pretty much the only ones who respond to me, therefore the only game in town for me, so i've been trying to begin commercially to get them to know me, from which i hope for a relationship.)

Interesting the girl who equates pro-dommes with whores and the counter arguments.  It seems to be taken for granted that a whore is an undesireable (no one said "sex-worker" or surrogate) and not as good a person as someone like a Domme or a therapist (as pointed out by one therapist), who does not have sex with their clients.  Is it a point of view that exchanging sex for money damages or degrades sex, or sex workers?  (I'm not saying there aren't widely occuring cases of this, as with abduction into prostitution or pimps.)  Is it a stereotype about the class, education, and responsibility of the sex worker, or willingness to do something illegal?  Why wouldn't the customer be equal regarded?  Because they're most often men, so non-emotional sex is felt to be less a betrayal of their nature than a woman whose role is seen as monogamous bonding and motherhood?  (Of course a sex worker might still have a husband and children.)   

It is a whole topic on its own but I think can bring to our awareness our cultural view of sex as negative vs a part of life and positive.  In BDSM there seems to be a defensive righteousness about not having sex, on the part of ProDommes and at parties.  I think it would be better for everyone to enjoy the sex, or in the case of the ProDommes, i'd appreciate their inner honest and (hopefully) positive attitude toward sex being expressed.  i don't mean have sex with clients, but have their pride in their profession something that stands on its own, not partly on righteousness of not having sex.  i think it warps the subs to have this view that there's something better or right about a Domme not having sexual contact with a sub consistently associated with their (professional) BDSM experiences. 

This fits in with financial domination as discussed in this thread because there has been a lot about domination for pay, which I think has been pointed out is different from the "fetish of financial domination."

What is the "fetish of financial domination?"  It could be arousal from a sub's spending being controlled without giving money to the Dominant, it could be the sub being made to give money to the Dominant is strong control and arousing, and/or it could be giving money to the Dominant is sexually arousing to the sub.  

My issues with financial domination is using the latter two fetishes for harmful financial exploitation, especially by purposely seducing and training someone to the fetish who didn't have it before.  Many aspects of training may have the same result, making the sub dependent upon the Dominant (and sessions or dominance) for arousal, but aren't so egregiously focused on money.       



     

(in reply to SurrenderForMe)
Profile   Post #: 105
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Financial Domination Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047