EvilGeoff -> RE: Misuse of Terms - Abuse? (10/2/2005 9:58:39 PM)
|
What's abuse, what's not abuse.... Not sure I can put a concrete definition of it up. Being a cop for 17 years though, I can tell you I saw a lot of it. Emotional abuse, physical abuse, spiritual abuse, the whole spectrum of it. While some here have posted that those who stay in abusive relations are giving defacto consent to the abuse, I would have to disagree. Even though as a cop I was very familiar with the "It's Saturday night, 11pm... We'll be at the Murphy's in 20 minutes... " routine, and I would get frustrated as all hell with Mrs Murphy for not packing up and getting the hell out of the relationship, I don't think for one minute I felt that she was consenting to the abuse. Tolerating it, perhaps, but consenting to it? No. Folks, it is very possible for someone to be in such a mental, emotional and spiritual state that they simply do not have the capacity to leave. They truly believe in their hearts and minds that their situation is the only option they have, that all other options are worse than the place they are. Cut off, alone, without friends, family, or support, they are overwhelmed and in a place where clear, rational thought simply doesn't occur. That place is not an easy one to get out of but it can and frequently does get created over time, slowly, surely, and forged with chains far stronger than any made of steel. Intervention from an outside presence is frequently the only way to stop the cycle. Ever hear of "til death us do part."? Some people take that vow literally. That does NOT mean they are consenting to abuse by their spouse. Abuse, like rape, robbery, burglary or any other crime, is never the fault of the one who has to suffer through it. Abuse, like rape, is ALWAYS the responsibility of the perpetrator. The one ACTING in this case is the one responsible. If you believe otherwise, if you believe that the victim of abuse, or rape, or any other kind of crime is somehow at fault, or responsible for the conduct of another human being, we will have to agree to disagree. And I ververently wish that you are not the victim of the criminal act of another person, and then have to listen to others tell you that you were at fault because you chose to wear something, or say something, or go someplace... that you "should have known better"... that "it was your own damn fault for going there... " etc. It's easy to blame the victim. It's a great way to shift responsibility from where it belongs, on the perpetrator. And we live in a society that thrives on shifting blame and avoiding responsibility. I'm not talking about consentual SM, I'm not talking about M/s or D/s, I'm talking about things done with the intent to harm or injure, to cause serious damage. I'm talking about saying things designed to tear down the mind and heart and soul. I'm talking about things done deliberately, or done in the heat of anger, done while out of control or with cold calculating calm.... What seperates abuse from what we do? Consent is one factor, being of the mind, heart and emotional soundness to WITHDRAW that consent is another. If someone is not emotionally, mentally, or spiritually able to withdraw consent, then they are not emotionally, mentally, or spiritually able to give consent either. And anything harmful done to them in that state could, and probably should, be considered abuse. And that's enough of my opinions for one night! *chucking a couple of pennies in the jar....* YIK, - Geoff
|
|
|
|