LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MsChief I know I have to live with the consequences and a tremination is not an option for me . My sub has made it clear that this is what he would expect. {clipped} I guess what I am saying is.....this situation hurts even more in a D/s relationship because there is more of a bond, trust etc. I feel even more let down than I ever would in vanilla (yes this did happen to me some 20 years ago!) {clipped} Ok. First things first. Are you prepared to raise this child yourself? If you are not prepared to raise the child, are you prepared to consider adoption? If adoption is an option, it may be one that is compatible with both your standard of not terminating the pregnancy, and your submissive male's preference to not have a baby in the relationship mix. If adoption is -not- an option, then it seems to me that you have made your decision, and the question is whether or not you will retain this submissive male. Frankly, you are the dominant member in the situation, and as such, it is up to you to set the groundwork. While I know that it is difficult to think that this relationship that you have invested time in may not survive this upheaval, that is pretty much what anyone goes through. For us, in a similar situation where the submissive partner would not have to carry the child, the submissive partner would have an opportunity to present an opinion -- which you clearly gave your manservant...however, the decision would rest with the owner and/or the individual who was actually carrying the baby. Dominance means taking responsibility. If you mutually decided not to use a condom (and considering that there does -not- have to be ejaculation to release sperm into the vaginal vault -- in fact, the greatest concentration of sperm per milileter of volume is actually in the pre-ejaculate!!!), you made a command decision when you allowed your manservant intercourse without a condom. He -also- made a decision to yield to that command decision, and will have to live with the consequences of not using any safeword or failsafe that you had set up between you to indicate that he was not willing to take on one of the risks of the behavior (namely, the risk of having to provide paternal support to any child that might be created through the act). However, his acceptance does not abrogate you of -your- responsibility to remain the dominant and controlling force in this decision process. If you want this baby, and your manservant refuses to continue in his service to you because of it, then you may have to release him from the D/s aspect of the situation, though releasing him from the collar will -not- release him from the responsibility to the child that he has created. However, if you don't let yourself be shattered by the responsibilities of this action, and you are firm in your leadership, you may be able to protect both your unborn child -and- your relationship with this man. In either case, both of you have responsibilities to yourselves, your ethics, and your progeny, and someone is going to have to step up to the plate, delineate those responsibilities and be the guide for how they are to be met, and ideally, it will be you, as the dominant member of your pair. Lady Zephyr
< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 10/9/2005 9:31:56 PM >
|