Smith117
Posts: 1447
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FullCircle You give people far too much credit for their training. No, I'm saying the training is there. Not everyone takes it. That is the problem, not guns. I think it should be mandated, personally. I think it you want one for defense, you should be taught how to defend with it. Taking guns away from law-abiding citizens is not the answer, making damned sure those citizens know how to use their weapon should be. quote:
ORIGINAL: FullCircle For me it underscored what kittinsol just said i.e. some people own guns for the wrong reasons. Same reason some people started smoking because it was sexy. Personal defence is just an afterthought and those people will attend the course to get the license and then pose in picture to impress others. The power of death so impressive isn't it? For every person you claim has a gun for the wrong reason, there are others who got one and only one and only one little one just for that 'just in case' moment. You want to know what power is more impressive than death? Life. I don't even carry yet. I have my CHL paperwork "all ready to go" and sitting in a drawer where it's been for the past 5 months. I took the class and went practice shooting, to evaluate which gun I wanted to carry and I haven't bought one yet. Mainly, I can't afford it. Our lovely economy has my more focused on things like food and gas to get to work. However, I do plan to get one. The thing I noticed, though is that just taking the CHL class made me much more apt to not get upset. That class teaches you first and foremost that the gun should be the LAST thing you reach for, no matter what. I found that when I got into an argument or something after the class, I remembered what they taught about de-escalation and realized that whatever was being argued about wasn't really that important. quote:
ORIGINAL: FullCircle Do you seriously think everyone that legally owns and carries a gun knows how to use it and hasn't got a little rusty at some point regarding safe handling? Nope. Not in the least. But those who seek to use them "legally" for defense are more apt to be trained to do so. The training is available, and it's highly encouraged by the teachers of the CHL class. They tell you first off that a CHL class is not a gun safety course...it's not a tactical shooting course and it's not going to turn you into a SWAT officer. It's going to educate you about when you can defend yourself so that you can legally carry a weapon. The thing they most repeated was just because you have one, doesn't mean you're going to get to it. So learn how and when to use it. This goes back to what I said about training. I think the tactical shooting courses SHOULD be mandated. I think if you're going to carry concealed, you should have exactly the same training course the cops use to learn how to use that force when and only when it's necessary. What I do NOT think should happen is for all law-abiding citizens to be disarmed. Because the criminals don't care about gun laws. That's just one more to add to the list of charges for whatever else they're doing.
|