fungasm
Posts: 321
Joined: 8/2/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen OK - here's the deal I am TS. The OP confused TS with shemale. He was put right, he apologised, it was accepted. But then the whole thing escalated by way of the myriad confusions at play in all this trans stuff. What people dont get - simply dont get - is that TS females do not want to be regarded as in any way male, so the suggestion that they would enjoy being desired for what remains of their male anatomy is ridiculous. That they should enjoy being desired for what remains of their male anatomy is an opinion expressed by some who dont seem to get it. Apparently, its perfectly OK to take one's pleasure from us as freaks, and we should enjoy it and our awarded status as freaks. We are not people. Why is this true? Because we are regularly regarded as fit for a bit of fun, a bit of a laugh, but no one would want a relationship with us - we'd be an embarassment after all. There is no need or interest to learn who we are or to find out what sort of partner we'd make - we're circus freaks, not people. All of this is confused of course, because some crossdressers might enjoy the description shemale - might enjoy being desired for their male parts but female appearance, and remain men throughout - ie people, not freaks. But the OP confused shemale with TS and then so did dozens of others who followed on. The End E The one is confused is YOU. What you don't get is that you don't speak for all TS- Transexuals. You are imposing your experience and belief system on anyone who has a gender issue. Just because someone knows that they are female. they know the gender they should be, doesn't mean that they are automatically repulsed by other gender characteristics they have, including genetalia. Just because you hate(d) your male anatomy, doesn't mean that everyone who is exploring gender issues does as well. This is currently under debate in the APA- which does currently stress that a gender "disorder" should be characterized by a disassociation of the original genetalia. It has been the practice not to allow gender reassignment surgery to anyone who didn't revile their current genetailia. But that is changing. Change is good. These are the same people who debated whether homosexuality was sociopathic in the last ten years. (1999... sigh). Gender is not about pink and blue all the time. 85% of the time, yes, someone is either a boy or a girl and they know it, and they have the anatomy, the hormonal endocrinology, and the sociological upbring to match what they know. But there are a great many humans who have different feelings, different experiences, different anatomy, different chemistry and a different worldview. You know this better than anyone. Why make it harder? If you try and lock everyone into your mold where identification with one gender means to revile all within you that identifies you as anything else, you are as bad (or even worse) than those who would insist that everyone live the anatomy they were born with and not the gender they identify with. --All of which has nothing to do with the fact that the Original Poster just wanted someone who had characteristics of both genders to bend him over and fuck him senseless- and you took all the fun out of his question by being the PC Police over a fucking word.
< Message edited by fungasm -- 5/30/2008 8:37:28 AM >
_____________________________
"Science is a lot like sex. Sometimes something useful comes of it, but that's not the reason we're doing it." (Richard Feynman) Blog: http://antidomme.sensualwriter.com
|