Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/19/2008 8:17:12 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
the mal ajust thing is true.

for a few years i was quite a force at the gay park.  i knew everyone and everything there. 

one type of personality, the dude wants head- then to beat the crap out of the guy.  then there is the fake pass.  while in the woods the car is --stripped of valueables.

the kicker tho is the "it turn me on the get head while driving"   dont EVER get into a car with a stranger for that, EVER.    when someone gets you in their car ride- you are not being taken anywhere good. in fact- it can very well be your last ride.  [male OR female}

(in reply to JulieorSarah)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/19/2008 2:23:29 PM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
Animals also eat their own feces, and that of other animals.  They lick their own asses instead of using toilet paper. 
Damn, why did the sinful humans come up with toilet paper!

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/19/2008 8:15:47 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
Ages ago I read a theory that homosexuality actually increases the chances of a particular set of genes being passed on because that way there were more adults taking care of the few offspring in the group. I have a friend who has two sons, both gay, and a daughter who has one child. There isn't a happier kid around than this one, two loving parents, two loving uncles who adore babysitting and a grandmother who absolutely lives to spend time with her.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to JulieorSarah)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/19/2008 10:45:25 PM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
That's right FIP - not all members of a troop need to produce offspring to ensure the survival of the troop. It is actually adaptive to have members who are not competing for the care and raising resources or for mates.


Z. 

_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/19/2008 10:52:51 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Is this about humans or animals ? Or both ?

Animals like to touch, humans like to touch. In fact animals like to touch humans, and vice versa. Under those conditions, procreation is not the goal at all.

From my viewpoint, I can see how a Woman can be attracted to another Woman, but I can't fathom a Man attracted to another Man. But I am not the whole world. Others are different and I do not project myself on them like alot of people do. Just goes to prove that we ARE NOT all the same under the skin. Skin is just a convenient mask so we know who we are talking to etc.

We are dying as a species, but very slowly. We are dying from poisons in our environment, as well as an unfit food supply. Some respond to this by trying to improve their intake. Each may or may not lose the inate desire to procreate. And I don't think it pays to kid ourselves, you become a homosexual you don't really have the desire to procreate. Hell I am straight and I have no desire to. Actually I do, but I know I am too old. But even years ago I said "This planet isn't good enough for any kid of mine". Where did such a thought come from ? Such an attitude actually.

Try not to take this as a superiority complex, it is just my opinion and how I have chosen to live my life. If I had decided to go for the one, I would move us very far away from the big city, perhaps to another country, but where ? And then where is my earning power ?

Well maybe I am different than some because I take responsibilities seriously. Where is the religion teaching people to do that ? The same religions that condemn homosexualtiy not only will not help you take care of your kids, the want donations. Well I guess your kid has to go hungry so you can tithe.

Every damn time I gain a bit more understanding I wind up with more questions. Why does the Pope need your money ? The Vatican could just live off the interest, and if not they could sell a few hundred pounds of gold. And how many kids did they adopt ?

So I hear that Onan pissed God off for jacking off. Well Onan had a Wife, perhaps he should have been in there taking care of her. So that is taken to mean that having an orgasm without attempting to procreate is a sin. Bullshit.

And even if it wasn't bullshit, when was this tenet adopted ? Back when the world's population was what ? Back when the land was fertile and there was not much overcrowding, and while there was disease, with less compaction of the population there were less epidemics than there could have been. That was kinda important because they didn't have much in the way of cures. People died of things that are now cured with a shot in the arm. So it was wrong even then.

But the epitome of this nonsense is embodied in the Islamic faith. If you think the Christians are bad, take a look at them. But religions share one common thing, the dogma will persist no matter what happens in society.

And if I am not mistaken, the Bible says "Man shall not lay with Man" but it says nothing about Women. What does that tell us ? Then they get up to the pulpit and preach against homosexuality, with no regard to societal conditions, but in the case of Catholic priests, keep your young sons away from them. They are so full of double standards that I doubt they could read a measuring tape, and if they could they would fuck it up.

Humans embue sex acts with some sort of..........I can't find the word. Religion caused most of this bullshit. I got this buddy, had two border collies. He's somewhat a Mormon, something I am not really fond of but that is the way he is. He drinks and smokes but part of the dogme stuck with him, he would not have the bitches fixed. When they went into heat he would keep them segregated from other animals. He said that he could satisfy them with his finger. At first this grossed me out, but thinking about it, why ?

Of course that is not the issue, if he didn't want puppies, why not have them fixed ? Sometimes the lack of logic confounds me. Actually hearing about this was one of my lessons in tolerance. He is not asking me to use my finger.

So we have religions that proclaim any sexual gratification that is not for procreation is bad. And then they say indiscriminate sex is bad, you need to get married, have the blessing of the church. I see this as a power play pure and simple. A matter of control.

But we do need to control ourselves. There are way too many people. And there are way too many people having kids that they cannot afford to take care of. So who is right ?

Maybe animals got it right. Sometimes they eat their young. I also heard that Eskimos, if their firstborn was a female they put the baby outside to freeze to death. In some early Asian cultures it was perfectly legal for a Man to kill his entire family. Didn't have to give a reason.

So contraception is bad, and having a bunch of kids, living in fucking poverty with little chance of success in life is good ? Give me a break.

But this is yet another can of worms. I know someone who sired two of his own grandchildren. There is a big stigma associated with this. In fact I keep a certain distance. So let's get down to incest. We know scientifically that incest breeds alot more defective offspring. It's a genetic thing. But by their own book, it must have happened. If indeed at one time there were only two people on the planet, if incest hadn't occurred there would be no people today.

But they conveniently got their story straight, someone went off to the land of Nod to get a Wife. Well if there was a place with other people in it that means that they were not the first people on Earth. Which time were they lying ?

Logic lays waste to any and all forms of decency in a way. But not the really for real. People used to get married at 13, but that is highly frowned upon now. And a guy getting a 13 yo girl who is more than say five years older is viewed as a criminal.

Animals that get raped simply go on about their business, but Women, and even Men who get raped need months or years of counselling. What gives ? Are we that weak, that inferior ?

Incest is criminal, but what do you do if there are no other people ? When we can look ourselves in the face and answer these questions, then we have grown. We have to explore the exact nature of why we think we are better than animals. In that lies the key.

Thing is you look at some people on this planet and all you can do is think they are animals. So how do we deal with that ? Morally as well. We have to shed or reevaluate most of our beliefs if we are to make any true progress. We have to look at ourselves in ways we have never done before. I have had a glimpse, but not much. This is probably because my mind was not polluted with religion. But I am nowhere near close to "being there".

I have found CMers to be among the most open minded people I have run across anywhere, yet I am the most radical thinker here, by far. You know it and I know it. I don't advocate wrong things, rape, incest and such. But they exist and it is humans who do it. Technically when animals do it we just consider it normal. If you breed dogs for example, you put them together and hopefully it happens.

The male is most likely a typical male :-) but did the female want him ? Do you know ? Sex without consent is an attack, but why does that not hold true for animals ? We need to explore exactly why. Not every person here is religious, and only religious zealots would proclaim that one can't be moral without religion. There is something else, something that has yet to be defined, what seperates us from the animals.

Not being a vegetable or mineral I would have to admit to being an animal, but not in that sense. But because I am secure that I have an intellect, if someone called me an animal I would shrug it off. If someone called me a fag I would laugh. Now if someone called Hunky a fag he should probably say "Flaming, wanna see ?". I would. That's the best way not to take shit from people.

However if you call a straight guy a fag, some of them will hurt you. If you call some people an animal you might have to deal with indignance on a large scale.

But let's put it this way, if you call someone a thief who has never stolen anything in their life they'll just look at you funny. If they have stolen, not gotten caught, and have chosen not to steal anymore but are tempted, you get a quite different reaction. Most likely indignance.

If someone was pissed at me and said "And you can't even get off on normal sex", well that would be true. Oh it might be nice for it to last a while, but really I want mine too. How would I respond ? "That's why I am not at the bar right now".

I really did not want to be this long and get into all this right now, but I did. But I submit this : The OP did not post this to talk about animals, they posted it to talk about humans. Who the hell wants to talk about dolphins for weeks on end ? 

So get your grains of salt out everybody. If some tell me I am full of shit, I'll be here. And I got some real salt. If anyone would like I'll send you some, that way when you 'take it with a grain of salt' you know you got the real McCoy. I got two varieties that are made for human consumption, and one that is intended as a bath salt. It's edible but lacks the finer qualities of the "organic" types. I am serious though, gimme an address to send it to on the other side and I'll make up envelopes of it. Then you can literally take what I say with a grain of salt.

Oh and animals ? I just remembered something. My buddy C had this dog named Tech. Half German shepherd and half wolf. This was the best dog I have ever known and the stories about him could fill a book. Maybe one day I will do that. But one day we are out on his porch, Tech never had a leash. This other dog goes walking by and Tech mounts ------ HIM. C said something like "That's a boy dog you stupid motherfucker". They did it right in the yard and I mean the front yard. We laughed our asses of and I spilt my beer. But it was worth it.

T

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/20/2008 9:06:55 AM   
LotusSong


Posts: 6334
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Domme Emeritus
Status: offline
I'm wondering if the study indicated that the animals sought out the same sex partner to begin with?

_____________________________

Life Lesson #1

I'm not your type.
I'm not inflatable.


(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/20/2008 2:00:53 PM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
I'm wondering where all the bitches in heat are crying on their front porch for men to come satisfy their needs...

Human bitches, of course.  I mean, if we can compare animals having sex to people having sex, why aren't we all sniffing each other's butts to check who is in heat, and having sex with random partners, whoever they may be, just to satisfy our time of the month horniness.

And if we are like animals, why are we on birth control?  Why not have as many pups as nature will allow?  Animals do it, why shouldn't we?

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/20/2008 5:31:50 PM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1



And if we are like animals, why are we on birth control?  Why not have as many pups as nature will allow?  Animals do it, why shouldn't we?



Well, if you want to be dropping sprogs all the time, what is to stop you ?


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to MissSepphora1)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/20/2008 6:47:06 PM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
Actually MisSep, humans are far more sexually active than most animals, owing to a lack of overt estrus by our females (that's means you lovely ladies don't broadcast when you are fertile (as opposed to just horny)). Fucking is a means of enforcing pair-bonds, both by increasing the amount of pleasure we enjoy together and by making it harder for males to be sure if and when they impregnate a particular female, making it necessary for them to be more attentive.

How do you think human mothers used to (and in some places still do) clean their baby's asses, before the very recent invention of toilet paper?

You are protesting loud and long, MissSep, but you aren't very clear or cogent. What exactly is your objection to homosexuality being a natural part of human sexualuity as opposed to our own rebellious invention?

We are like animals because we are animals, lest we forget.


Z.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/20/2008 8:21:39 PM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
We are animals with brains, the lucky ones at least.  We can think for ourselves, and reason.
The idea that someone can compare human sexuality to dog sexuality is laughable.  Dogs will do any dog, anywhere.  I would like to think humans are a little more selective, because we have brains, but I've started to realize maybe some are not.

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/20/2008 8:23:32 PM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
common sense?  is that something you are familiar with, or do you need a lesson?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1



And if we are like animals, why are we on birth control?  Why not have as many pups as nature will allow?  Animals do it, why shouldn't we?



Well, if you want to be dropping sprogs all the time, what is to stop you ?


(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 12:20:27 AM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

We are animals with brains, the lucky ones at least.  We can think for ourselves, and reason.
The idea that someone can compare human sexuality to dog sexuality is laughable.  Dogs will do any dog, anywhere.  I would like to think humans are a little more selective, because we have brains, but I've started to realize maybe some are not.


Quite the contrary, I find the idea that someone is unable to see the continuity between human and animal sexuality rather laughable, if laughter is the object. To imagine that a few centuries of reason have elevated us so much that we are no longer affected by basic urges seems absurd. You'd like to think humans are a little more selective but, as has already been explained several times, humans are way more sexual way more of the time than just about any other animal.

Dogs will NOT do any dog anywhere. That's a completely groundless statement. Unless you mean they are not prudish and hypocritical about their desires? But their desires are not indiscriminate even if their criteria don't match ours.

Do you eat? Do you shit? Do you breathe? Yes? You are an animal with a big brain and an ego that makes it think is is better and more important than all the others and that it's physical desires are totally under the control of its powers of reason and morality.

What I hear you saying (and correct me if I am wrong) is that homosexuality is a choice, not ones inborn nature and that even if it is ones nature one should resist it in favour of reason.


Z.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to MissSepphora1)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 4:26:21 AM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
Yes I believe homosexuality is a choice, just like I believe getting up every morning is a choice.
And when you say "we" as a whole being driven by our sexual urges, are you excusing rape?  Perhaps the other person really did want it, deep down, and the rapist was just using their God given sexual prowess?
Or maybe you're excusing pedophiles?  Because God gave them the urges to have sex with babies, so therefore they should be able to do whatever they want?
Maybe you're with NAMBLA in lowering the age of consent, because by God teenagers are going to do it anyway, so it might as well be with 50-60 year old men.  And why don't we use the Mormon sect in Texas as proof of that?

I'm not equating homosexuality to pedophilia, because I believe that homosexuality can be between two consenting adults, and pedophilia can be between opposite sex as it most of the time is.

But there are urges we all get sexually that we control for various reasons.
I haven't had sex in 9 months, and you don't see me hanging out near strip clubs looking for the first available hard on.

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 8:52:15 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

Yes I believe homosexuality is a choice, just like I believe getting up every morning is a choice.


....really? Do you also believe that breathing out is a choice? After all, what makes you breathe out? What's that? Biology i hear you say? Well, the same biology means that we can't stay asleep in bed all day. Not without artificial means anyway.
i assume you also oppose the use of animals in all experiments. After all, you have effectively denied that there can be any relevance to human behaviour in a study of animals.

Whether you mean it or not, you are coming across as a homophobe who is desperately trying to hold on to a specious argument in order to back up a bigoted opinion. If this is untrue then i apologise but strongly suggest you may want to revisit your use of language.

[edited for poor spelling and lack of coffee]

< Message edited by philosophy -- 5/21/2008 8:53:15 AM >

(in reply to MissSepphora1)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 9:04:08 AM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
Of course I am not excusing rape or any form of coercive activity. Please stop trying to demonise me for disagreeing with you. And stop demonising animals too while you are at it. Constructing rationalisations for your prejudice by arbitrarily ascribing reprehensible behaviours to others is an irresponsible and offensive form of argument.

And your previous post have certainly been equating homosexuality with criminal and reprehensible activities.

The science is clear that bisexuality and homosexuality is a genetic disposition and part of the healthy range of human (and animal) sexual expression. As you pointed out, criminal sexual behaviour is not confined to homosexuals but then neither is licentiousness. By insisting that being gay is a rebellious choice, contrary to the evidence, you are merely propagating a dangerous prejudice. And by flinging shit at your opponents you are merely hoping that some of the stink will remain.

Why not take on the science, if your position is so certain?


Z.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to MissSepphora1)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 9:32:10 AM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
Was I born to enjoy torturing men?  Is being a Domme in my biology?
From what I've been told I was a sweet, loving, caring, kind little girl with white blonde hair and bright blue eyes who loved everything and everyone.
There was no indication whatsoever that I would grow up to enjoy being sadistic sexually.  Is D/s a kink?  Perhaps.  I can have and enjoy sex without it.  But I enjoy sex much more when I'm in control of the situation.  And I enjoy sex even more when my partner is pushed just a little past his comfort zone.
Can I choose not to be Domme?  Of course.  Do I want to?  Would I choose to be submissive?  I'd rather die than be submissive.  Is it in my DNA?  Hardly.

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

Yes I believe homosexuality is a choice, just like I believe getting up every morning is a choice.


....really? Do you also believe that breathing out is a choice? After all, what makes you breathe out? What's that? Biology i hear you say? Well, the same biology means that we can't stay asleep in bed all day. Not without artificial means anyway.
i assume you also oppose the use of animals in all experiments. After all, you have effectively denied that there can be any relevance to human behaviour in a study of animals.

Whether you mean it or not, you are coming across as a homophobe who is desperately trying to hold on to a specious argument in order to back up a bigoted opinion. If this is untrue then i apologise but strongly suggest you may want to revisit your use of language.

[edited for poor spelling and lack of coffee]

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 9:35:41 AM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
Show me where science has found the homo gene, and I'll admit defeat.
All they have shown is that in certain circumstances, in certain family types, in certain birth orders, homosexuality and bisexuality can and does occur.
And at that end, sociopaths, serial killers, and rapists can occur.  Is being a rapist in one's DNA?  Then perhaps we should give them a pass?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

Of course I am not excusing rape or any form of coercive activity. Please stop trying to demonise me for disagreeing with you. And stop demonising animals too while you are at it. Constructing rationalisations for your prejudice by arbitrarily ascribing reprehensible behaviours to others is an irresponsible and offensive form of argument.

And your previous post have certainly been equating homosexuality with criminal and reprehensible activities.

The science is clear that bisexuality and homosexuality is a genetic disposition and part of the healthy range of human (and animal) sexual expression. As you pointed out, criminal sexual behaviour is not confined to homosexuals but then neither is licentiousness. By insisting that being gay is a rebellious choice, contrary to the evidence, you are merely propagating a dangerous prejudice. And by flinging shit at your opponents you are merely hoping that some of the stink will remain.

Why not take on the science, if your position is so certain?


Z.


(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 9:44:54 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

Was I born to enjoy torturing men?  Is being a Domme in my biology?
From what I've been told I was a sweet, loving, caring, kind little girl with white blonde hair and bright blue eyes who loved everything and everyone.
There was no indication whatsoever that I would grow up to enjoy being sadistic sexually.  Is D/s a kink?  Perhaps.  I can have and enjoy sex without it.  But I enjoy sex much more when I'm in control of the situation.  And I enjoy sex even more when my partner is pushed just a little past his comfort zone.
Can I choose not to be Domme?  Of course.  Do I want to?  Would I choose to be submissive?  I'd rather die than be submissive.  Is it in my DNA?  Hardly.




(my italics)

......i assume you are trying to suggest that all sexual behaviour is a pure choice? That type of position would support your assertion that homosexuality is a choice. However, it does go against virtually all research into the subject.
i italicised the last phrase of your post. How do you know there is no DNA based component to enjoying D/S based sex? i'm left handed, it is entirely possible that exactly the same DNA twist that makes that true for me also has an influence in non-usual sex practices. The thesis presented in this book...
http://www.righthandlefthand.com/
......suggests it may be true.
Now, if you're a geneticist or some other biological scientist who has a cogent and verifiable thesis suggestion as to why, say, homosexulity, does not have a DNA component i'd love to hear it. If you're just expressing an opinion then your arguments go into another pile, along with the rest of those who deny all verifiable research in order to continue holding onto a disproven thesis.

(in reply to MissSepphora1)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 9:53:42 AM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
Again, show me proof that there is a gay gene, and I'll believe it hands down and never argue the point again.
But then there are a whole lot of other sexual deviations that need to be explained as well. 
And are you equating being left handed to being D/s?
If

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

Was I born to enjoy torturing men?  Is being a Domme in my biology?
From what I've been told I was a sweet, loving, caring, kind little girl with white blonde hair and bright blue eyes who loved everything and everyone.
There was no indication whatsoever that I would grow up to enjoy being sadistic sexually.  Is D/s a kink?  Perhaps.  I can have and enjoy sex without it.  But I enjoy sex much more when I'm in control of the situation.  And I enjoy sex even more when my partner is pushed just a little past his comfort zone.
Can I choose not to be Domme?  Of course.  Do I want to?  Would I choose to be submissive?  I'd rather die than be submissive.  Is it in my DNA?  Hardly.




(my italics)

......i assume you are trying to suggest that all sexual behaviour is a pure choice? That type of position would support your assertion that homosexuality is a choice. However, it does go against virtually all research into the subject.
i italicised the last phrase of your post. How do you know there is no DNA based component to enjoying D/S based sex? i'm left handed, it is entirely possible that exactly the same DNA twist that makes that true for me also has an influence in non-usual sex practices. The thesis presented in this book...
http://www.righthandlefthand.com/
......suggests it may be true.
Now, if you're a geneticist or some other biological scientist who has a cogent and verifiable thesis suggestion as to why, say, homosexulity, does not have a DNA component i'd love to hear it. If you're just expressing an opinion then your arguments go into another pile, along with the rest of those who deny all verifiable research in order to continue holding onto a disproven thesis.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature - 5/21/2008 9:55:03 AM   
MissSepphora1


Posts: 669
Joined: 1/11/2008
Status: offline
If you are, then explain why my grandmother who was born left handed was trained to use her right hand and did so until she died.
Does that mean we can train gay people to be straight?

(in reply to MissSepphora1)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Scientists claim homosexuality common in nature Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094