SleepyDom -> Complete obedience = doormat? (5/25/2008 7:54:15 PM)
|
In another thread was this unanswered question "how can a Master want to train a sub to obey completely yet say they don't want a doormat?" I suppose the answer depends on the definition of a doormat, but I understand the gist of the question and here are my thoughts. I do want to train a sub to obey completely. I want her to submit to my will so completely, to trust me in all things, that obedience is just second nature to her. But from this it doesn't follow: 1) That she can't be herself; that her personality is somehow suppressed as in not allowed to engage in humor, light banter, romantic gestures, sayings, and actions, i.e. all the little quirky things I love about her. Why would this follow unless I've ordered her to not be herself, to not be funny, to not let her personality shine? And I would never want to suppress things about her that I love. I might do so of things that I don't. If she's often disrespectful or dishonest, for example, those things will be punished for and corrected. Although there's a time for everything, in general complete obedience to me doesn't mean that there won't be times for humor or romantic moments. 2) That her intelligence is suppressed or that her opinions and preferences not allowed to be expressed. I DESIRE intelligence because I want to give her responsibilities and not have to micromanage every little thing. Also because her opinions and advise can be valuable, especially with regard to things she knows much more about. I want to own her mind, not just her body, why should I let her mind go to waste? And I want to know her preferences because she matters to me and I want her to be happy. While they don't dictate my decisions, they do enter into the equation. Even an M/s is still a relationship after all and it won't last if both parties are not happy. or 3) That she can't discuss or question my orders. Such things can be not only justified but actually a good thing. I'm not perfect and sometimes I may forget a good reason not to order her to do x and therefore order her to do x. But knowing me as well as I know her, she may realize this and remind me to make sure that's what I really want her to do, thereby saving me from a mistake. Complete obedience does not imply blind obedience. I want to know when I have misinformation or when I don't have the relevant information. If she's in possession of such, I want her to let me know rather than simply following my orders. But this is generally understood; I don't think anyone wants blind obedience. Now if she's questioning me because she doesn't WANT to obey, that's a different matter. So is a sub who is intelligent, allowed to use her intelligence and to express her opinions and preferences, a sub who can be funny, romantic, and allowed to be herself, a sub who is allowed, even encouraged, to discuss matters when necessary, is she a doormat? If so, then yes I do want a doormat. If not, I just answered how I want complete obedience without her being a doormat. Well, that's my view. Fire away!
|
|
|
|