Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
LOL, I am starting to like this place. We got thorn over here who did not actually rebut what I said, but I will agree that it is unlikely. At least at this time. Thing is, there is no way to know what exactly is in an IC, even with the spec sheet. Believe me I have seen alot of them. And one thing, time and date cannot be maintained by NVRAM. It takes a clock. That takes a processor. Your phone can store pictures, ever hear the old saying a picture is worth a thousand words ? Well I'm sure that has changed but even of all the diverse people I know nobody really can answer. If the pictures can be in NVRAM so can the voice recording. You download an MP3, say three megs for a four minute song. We are talking 44.1Khz sampling and 128 K MPEG encoding. Full stereo. Basically a high resolution signal. And of course you can read and write to NVRAM. It is not very power hungry even if you invoke a write cycle. All the battery has to run is the processor really, that is what will be consuming the power. But they have made strides in reducing power consumption of such devices.If not laptop PCs would still have 486s in them. These gigahertz speeds in your home PC would not be possible. And when you unplug that PC and it comes back displaying the correct time and date, there was a processor involved. It's basically built into the chipset, and documentation of the chips will not tell you enough to know if these things have been implemented. Thing is, we all know they could, we just don't know that they do. Now with a cellphone being turned off but the battery in, it can easily be a bug. And that has happened. What I am talking about that I don't know if they do yet is to actually record while the main battery is dead or missing. When it is off it is simply in the off mode, it is not really off. Like a remote controlled TV, part of it stays alive waiting for input. This is exactly what we are talking about. Input. Can a small part of a processor,or possibly a different processor run on a 3.6V battery and write A/D converted audio to NVRAM ? Of that there is no doubt. Do they do it ? I don't know, I doubt it. I imagine if you were John Gotti walking into a cellphone store they might offer you this special deal, but as possible as it is, I think it unlikely to be incorporated into all cellphones AT THIS TIME. Think about it, change batteries in your cellphone, do you lose the pictures ? This is not rocket science. As for rocket science now we have DA. They don't need a Harrier over your property to see this shit. If their lenses can pull up a license plate number from a geosynchonous orbit (for those who don't know that is a bit over 22,000 miles up from the equator) they don't need to get close. Actually that brings up a curiousity of mine, how to focus it. Whatever they use for lenses, there is no exception. No material has has same refractive index for all visible wavelengths even, let alone going into short UV and far IR. Even to take a decent photograph they used to have to coat lenses and use compound lenses with both crown and flint glass elements. Going beyond the visible spectrum certainly posed some challenges. There has not been much information released about this technology, I guess for good reason. I'll be back. T
|