Najakcharmer
Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou Well maybe so. But I didn't make that story up. It was a large black snake. It was probably a Western Rat Snake, and they are fairly large. It was near their dog house, and we killed it. Better safe than sorry IMO. Obviously not better for the snake, or the local ecoystem, but you clearly don't care about that. If any of the thousand-odd rodents that snake would have eaten end up pooping in your Cheerios, don't complain. And if was a racer you killed, which seems likely, keep in mind that racers are a) harmless and b) territorial and aggressive to other snakes including venomous species. What species might come in to occupy the niche you freed up for them? quote:
Well I know it was a water mocassin, and I do know what they look like. I have seen lots of them. You understand that when you've heard that line as many times as I have, and in 90% of the cases it was dead wrong, it gets pretty old. I wish every venomous snake that gets reported would stay a venomous snake by the time I get there, but mysteriously the vast majority of them undergo a species swap between the time you see them and the time I catch them. Funny that. Anyhow I've largely lost my sense of humor about all the wild goose chases, along with any possible trust in a non-herpetologists identification of a snake as a sure'nuff water moccasin. quote:
According to this, cottomouths do bask in tree snags. It was dead tree hanging out over the water, and it was a cottomouth. A tree snag isn't a tree, and you don't seem to understand that the physiology and anatomy of that particular terrestrial viper comes with some fairly significant limitations built in. If we're talking about a shelf with easy access from the ground and enough width to balance on, you can have a cottonmouth on it. The younger, slimmer animals are better at balancing, but the adults seriously suck at it. In a habitat where you have multiple species of snakes that don't suck at tree climbing, and one species that does but occasionally can heave up on the very low and wide or heavily tangled branches, what do you think people see more of balancing on a tree limb? And the average non herpetologist cannot accurately distinguish between Nerodia and Agkistrodon. Absolutely can't. They just think they can. quote:
According to the Arkansas Game and Fish Commision, I have every right to defend myself from wild animals if I feel threatened. I am reminded of a scene in South Park. "It's coming right at us. We have to shoot!" Mmm hmmm. quote:
I've always been of the opinion that responsible people don't keep wild animals as pets. Everyone I have ever known that keeps snakes feeds them live mice or rabbits. I don't actually keep "pets", other than a cat that seems to have adopted me. However I don't have an issue with private keepers provided they have the same good standards of veterinary care, secure housing and professional skill and humane handling equipment as any public or commercial facility. There is really a lot of potential value in the private keeping sector, as well as a lot of messes that the professionals have to clean up after. A great many very positive things for education, research and conservation have come out of the private sector. One other thing about the private sector. The United States has no government programs for venom production. None. Zero. They're all privately owned, every one. All venom production for antivenom and crucial medical research, including a new treatment for breast cancer, anticoagulant drugs and reducing insulin dependency for type I diabetics, comes from venomous snakes kept by the private sector. So if some responsible people did not keep wild animals, we would have neither antivenom nor a plethora of very useful drugs in human medicine and medical research. If you know and care about anyone with breast cancer, or who has had a bypass operation, you should be very thankful indeed for private keepers of wild venomous snakes.
|