domtimothy46176
Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004 From: Dayton, Ohio area Status: offline
|
I think it was Thomas Jefferson who proposed that criminals sentenced to death should be hanged in public the dawn following the trial and left in full public view until sundown. He further proposed that all the earthly possessions of the condemned man be sold and the proceeds split between the family of the condemned and the family of the victim. I think such swift, sure consequences might go a long way toward providing a deterrent. I will note, however, that this "grand experiment" we call democracy was founded upon the idea that we, the constituency, are a basically moral people. I believe it may also have been Jefferson who recognized that our form of self-governance would surely fail if we ever lost our moral underpinnings. I will leave it to the reader's judgment as to whether the current state of affairs is a direct result of the radical departure our society has taken from personal responsibility and Judeo-Christian ethics. I personally think that our current legal structure is not sustainable without a common understanding among the populace of what is and is not desirable for a healthy society. The current division, between those who recognize no higher authority beyond themselves and those who believe personal desire must sometimes be secondary to the greater good, does not allow for a workable compromise that might lead to increased consistency within the legal system. It's my personal opinion that this inconsistency, where justice becomes a roll of the dice rather than a certainty, has lead to the lack of faith in the established system. Whenever consequence becomes divorced from action there is a decreased ability to guide behavior. Until and unless we see a sustained revival in consistently clear, logical applications of the law, I believe we will continue to see a decline in the effectiveness of the legal system and an increasing disregard for the rule of law, in general. One of the biggest obstacles to the necessary reforms, IMO, is the mindset seen amongst the general public that cutting corners and bending rules is not a serious problem. Whether the blame lies with the deficiencies in public education or the decline of honesty and civility in our political climate, the result is the same. John Q. Public appears to subscribe to the theory that it's ok to shitcan the rulebook if it benefits him. Personally, I think we're approaching the point of no return. Born in 1966, I am a member of the first generation raised under the idea that there is no greater responsibility than to be happy. As my generation comes into political power, I have no hope that we'll see a reversal of the current trend. I still teach my children that citizenship means more than a piece of paper given out at Awards Night, but it's obviously an alien concept that's not being taught in school. Our schools do teach about the civil rights battles of the 60's and other important issues but they don't teach how it's all inter-connected with constitutional rights and citizen responsibility. I do want my children to know that they have certain rights but I also want them to understand their responsibilities as citizens and active participants in self-governance. I don't think that rights and responsibilities are currently being taught as the twin sides of the freedom coin. I think if we want a society where murder is infrequent, we have a responsibility to demand that our elected officials make the consequences crystal clear and sufficiently onerous as to be a deterrent, not only to the guilty but also to those who might be contemplating murder. If we want a society where justice is truly blind, then we have a responsibility to demand the necessary changes that would result in such. In addition to demanding reform at the city, county, state or federal level, however, we must also be prepared to demand better of ourselves. We need to be committed to being involved at every level, staying informed and demanding that our officials make appropriate decisions. If we cherry-pick only those issues that are near and dear to our hearts, we're ignoring the fundamental truth that it's all a part of the whole. It is, after all, our government and it does respond to our will, voiced through how we vote. One thing we can count on is that the squeaky wheel gets the grease and, until the populace makes its displeasure known in sufficient numbers, things will continue to follow the path of least resistance. Timothy
|