Thadius
Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Alumbrado quote:
I challenge you to please point out any statement of mine here or anyplace else that suggests that I support any of the positions put forward in any of the 4 books that I named in this topic. Do you have a link to where I said you supported them? Or are you just using your amazing mind reading skills to come up with these meanings you keep attributing to me, that don't match what I said? Because if you have the ability to take the words "how about anyone ", and prove that I was only thinking of you, that'll get you the JREF million... otherwise, you might want to reconsider. If you are responding to my replies, and then presenting remarks like.... quote:
And how exactly does one 'understand the minutiae' of a complete work of fakery? Surely you aren't claiming to have learned something about the viewpoint of the Elders? quote:
So what is there to learn about Jewish culture from reading the Protocols? quote:
Here's a thought..how about anyone who doesn't want to be perceived as adhering to a certain ideology, doesn't regurgitate the talking points of said ideology? And applying your already stated policy of making such judgements about whether somebody is a racist or not based on their uses of catch phrases, not to mention that you accused me of blocking the discussion and tap dancing around the issue. And also claiming... quote:
And again, are you saying the Protocols represent the views of Jewish extremists?, You keep lumping it in with other books that do represent the views of their authors, and you talk about various versions and minutiae, as though it had in fact been written to be what it purports to be, a Zionst takeover manual.... What other conclussion should be drawn from your words? Especially since I have stated repeatedly that the work in them was nonsense. You keep attributing the authorship of the Protocols to Goedsche... but neglect to include the findings that some of the Protocols were direct plagerisms of a satirical book by Maurice Joly. So who is it that is derailing the thread or tap dancing around issues or topics? You seem to be fine with casting implications on what somebody is saying, but refuse to add to the discussion anything other than that. Then when questioned on a particular issue, you claim that the person is deflecting, avoiding, in denial, because they aren't allowing you to dictate the exact discussion. Debate and discussion are a 2 way street, you ask and answer, and expect others to do the same; well at least some of us do.
_____________________________
When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
|