IvyMorgan -> RE: -=Damocles mind fuck=- (8/10/2008 3:43:17 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist quote:
ORIGINAL: Surrenderwithin quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedingMore220 Yep, I dunno about that one. Sounds rather cruel to do that to someone he's just met. Everyone has a great laugh at her expense, but that would be my last date with him. I am thinking if he is playing with someone they have likely negotiated. If he really enjoys a good mind fuck he likely looks for play partners who like them as well. I am a thrill seeker and my number one kink is fear.... I would be in lust and he wouldnt be able to get rid of me. Heck, Master did something similiar during our first play session and hell or high water couldnt get me away from him now! It all depends on the person! Maggi NeedingMore220 I see what you’re saying but it wasn’t for the laugh. Better comedy is obtained in much safer ways. It was a test of submission I would imagine. He was never one much for the “fuckaround”. He was a handsome man and sometimes… well, a lot of times actually, girls tell handsome guys they are submissive when they truly aren’t in order to try and get the cock or land a wealthy man. So this new date test meant either you were strong enough and twisted enough to swim with the sharks (him/us) or you went home. If a girl can’t take a good fuck, mentally or otherwise, she shouldn’t "submit" to being hung over a deadly sword in the first place. The “mind fuck” wasn’t as much a dirty trick as it was an attitude adjustment. It sure as fuck erases the fantasies and separates the heavy players from bullshit role players fast when the consequences of flirting with death like a “cock tease” becomes a “death shoved down your throat” situation instead. If the thrill makes you wet and you submit to the thrilling sensations swallowing the experience whole instead of fighting for control and withdrawing, you get to join the big boy’s club. When you submit, submit all the way or go home seems to be the nature of that test. No room for false pride or hidden control issues in that game. Personal Opinion: He's still going to filter out some genuine subs who don't like this kind of thing. There's a difference between agree to be hung over a sword and having someone pretend to drop you onto it. Yes, it erases the fantasy of D/s, but I think I, in all my subbieness, would be walking away *as soon as* he got me down. In fact, I might be screaming for a DM to get me down. Does it make me less genuine that someone who would submit to this... erm no... does it mean that I've a history of having blades stuck in me so it's no fun any more, even as a joke... erm yes.
|
|
|
|