DomDolf
Posts: 363
Joined: 7/11/2008 Status: offline
|
Experience is hard to judge because time is not an accurate tool, neither are just the hardships, the training, the intellect, the desire to be better, on and on and on. The accumulation of all of these is what experience is. The algorithm is too complex for anyone to accurately assess at all. Impossible to base on years of "experience". We, as humans, generally feel like we must weigh and measure everything to some extent. In the experience arena we are left with many "common sense" and assumptions based on information we can easily understand and evaluate. I believe a person's capability is more important than the experience level. The capabilities allow the experience to exponentially improve the possible outcome. With limited capability then there is little experience will do for a person. I don't discuss the number of years of experience I have with people, though a story or two tends to give it away. I allow my actions and my interactions to speak for me. My experience (lol), tells me that people preaching about how many years of experience they have are limited in some other fundamental areas. Not that we all don't have faults, but the 'preachers' tend to have some faults, obvious to me, in common. Dolf
< Message edited by DomDolf -- 8/17/2008 6:16:00 PM >
|