CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth Seriously? This may not be a particularly appropriate viewpoint, but: I don't think there's such a thing as "destructive directions". I think that there's plenty of things that each of us have already done that we can decide later were harmful and "beyond the pale". I think that we stay in relationships so long as we can convince ourselves that the good outweighs the bad, and so long as we convince ourselves of this, we choose to interpret events as "non-harmful" or ultimately "worthwhile". But we always have the option to re-interpret. We always have the ability to wake up and say "that wasn't a healthy BDSM relationship, that was abuse". And anyone can do this with any relationship, at any time. There is no magic behavior that is non-abusive. There is no magic line where kink crosses into abuse. There's just labels we hang on things, because we want to call things "good" and "bad" to make people look better or worse. Worse than that: there is no such thing as consent in the moment. There is only consent after the fact, and that can always be revoked. No matter how many documents you have the other party sign, no matter how adamantly they swear, no matter how much you respect their safewords, if one day they wake up and say "I was raped", you raped them. If one day they wake up and say, "she manipulated me into that scene", you non-consentually manipulated him into a scene. If one day they wake up and tell the local community, "he's a manipulative abuser and dangerous", and they are believed, guess what? In terms of these "subtle hurts", I think that this is a particularly relevant response in that it emphasizes that perception is the key element in the process... and it is the perception of the individual who sees hirself as being 'harmed' that carries the onus of defining what that harm is -for hir- and how it manifests... and what to do about it. There is an old saying "Hindsight is 20/20." To me, this is a constant reminder that our memories are not pure reflections of all of the facets of a situation -- even as they occur, we modify circumstances in our memories in order to allow them to form a cohesive pattern with our perceptions of the moment... and then allow them to mutate as time and external cues modify our perceptions. This is why it is nearly impossible for us to judge whether a person is -harming- someone else if that 2nd individual is consensually participating in the ongoing behavior. While it may look like 'harm' to us, from the outside, from the inside the dynamic may elicit a completely different perception to the participants. It is possible, though, to choose how you allow your perceptions to color your experiences. I lost a baby at 8.5 months into the pregnancy. She only lived for 15 minutes. I had gotten pregnant out of wedlock, and married the father despite not being romantically interested in him (or marriage). I fought to keep the pregnancy after some complications with asthma in the early months. I trusted a doctor that a friend had used for her pregnancies, even though some of what he was telling me didn't sound right, and gave birth to a baby 2 weeks early who only weighed a little over 2 lbs! I could have come through the experience very bitter and angry. Instead, I used the experience to learn about birth and to try to help other women to not have to go through what I did -- it provided the drive and impetus for 15 amazingly happy years as a midwife. Everything we experience is subject to perception. Much of the 'subtle harm' that we allow to accumulate around our lives does its greatest damage -not- when it is occurring, but when we return to it in our memories, infusing it with the bits and pieces of flotsam from other places in our lives where we perceived 'harm', and alternately vilifying the other bodies involved and beating up on ourselves for our 'poor judgement'. How much more productive it is when we know ourselves, when we are forthright about what we are looking for and when we are clear and direct when a situation falls outside of the bounds of what we can accept as a 'healthy' situation. One other thing that I think is relevant is the tendency that we, as humans, have to let fear rule our decision-making processes. Fear can chase us out of workable situations that need some modification but which could be healthy if we didn't run scared at the first signs of an issue -- and fear can also hold us in situations where we are no longer healthy because we don't know what the future will bring and the 'known' is easier to cope with than the 'unknown', even if the 'known' has become unhealthy. To me, that is like making the choice to stay in a burning building because at least you're in your own bed! It doesn't make sense, but as a paramedic I saw people who -did- things like this... they were more afraid of losing their home and security than about losing their lives. I think that it is beneficial, on occasion, to look at one's life and see where time, energy, money, affection, etc., are going -- and to make sure that we are expending these resources in ways that are allowing us to continue to be our genuine self... and getting a good sense of the places where we're letting our 'known comforts' and our fear of change continue to drain energy that could be used for more productive purpose. BDSM aside, this is a conversation that every person needs to have with hirself regularly -- at least until caring for the genuine self becomes second nature. Calla Firestorm
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|